Estephania Candelo, Ashley Darakjian, Karol Avila-Castano, Angela Donaldson
{"title":"非实体和实体移植受者难治性慢性鼻窦炎的危险因素。","authors":"Estephania Candelo, Ashley Darakjian, Karol Avila-Castano, Angela Donaldson","doi":"10.1177/19458924231177855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Transplant patients are high risk for surgery due to their immunocompromised state. There is a paucity of evidence concerning the differences in incidence of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) in solid versus non-solid organ transplant. Our aim is to analyze the difference in incidence of CRS requiring endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) between non-solid and solid transplant populations and determine if certain risk factors are associated with increased incidence of recalcitrant CRS in non-solid versus solid transplants.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Multisite tertiary academic center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective chart review of 1303 transplant recipients who were seen in our rhinologic clinic for CRS between 2017 and 2022. A total of 224 patients underwent ESS and were further analyzed for risk factors associated with recalcitrant disease requiring sinus surgery. Subgroup analysis based on solid and non-solid organ transplant was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 224 patients in the study, 171/224 (76.3%) had solid transplants while 53/224 (23.6%) had non-solid transplants. 17.19% of all transplant recipients required ESS. The incidence of ESS in non-solid transplants was 28.2% versus 57% in solid transplant. The risk of recalcitrant CRS in solid transplant recipients was almost 1.78 times greater than those with non-solid organ transplant (95% CI, 1.27-2.54, p = 0.0005). Individual factors such as certain immunotherapy drugs, pancytopenia, and rejection appear to correlate with the risk of ESS in both non-solid and solid organ transplant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Risk of ESS was greater in the solid transplant recipients compared to those who received non-solid organ transplant.</p>","PeriodicalId":7650,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk Factors for Recalcitrant Chronic Rhinosinusitis in Non-Solid and Solid Transplant Recipients.\",\"authors\":\"Estephania Candelo, Ashley Darakjian, Karol Avila-Castano, Angela Donaldson\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19458924231177855\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Transplant patients are high risk for surgery due to their immunocompromised state. There is a paucity of evidence concerning the differences in incidence of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) in solid versus non-solid organ transplant. Our aim is to analyze the difference in incidence of CRS requiring endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) between non-solid and solid transplant populations and determine if certain risk factors are associated with increased incidence of recalcitrant CRS in non-solid versus solid transplants.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Multisite tertiary academic center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective chart review of 1303 transplant recipients who were seen in our rhinologic clinic for CRS between 2017 and 2022. A total of 224 patients underwent ESS and were further analyzed for risk factors associated with recalcitrant disease requiring sinus surgery. Subgroup analysis based on solid and non-solid organ transplant was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 224 patients in the study, 171/224 (76.3%) had solid transplants while 53/224 (23.6%) had non-solid transplants. 17.19% of all transplant recipients required ESS. The incidence of ESS in non-solid transplants was 28.2% versus 57% in solid transplant. The risk of recalcitrant CRS in solid transplant recipients was almost 1.78 times greater than those with non-solid organ transplant (95% CI, 1.27-2.54, p = 0.0005). Individual factors such as certain immunotherapy drugs, pancytopenia, and rejection appear to correlate with the risk of ESS in both non-solid and solid organ transplant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Risk of ESS was greater in the solid transplant recipients compared to those who received non-solid organ transplant.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19458924231177855\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19458924231177855","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
目的:移植患者免疫功能低下,手术风险高。关于实体与非实体器官移植中慢性鼻窦炎(CRS)发病率差异的证据缺乏。我们的目的是分析非实体和实体移植人群中需要内窥镜鼻窦手术(ESS)的CRS发生率的差异,并确定某些危险因素是否与非实体和实体移植中顽固性CRS发生率增加有关。研究设计:回顾性队列。设置:多站点高等教育中心。方法:回顾性分析2017年至2022年在我院鼻科就诊的1303例CRS移植受者。共有224名患者接受了ESS,并进一步分析了与需要鼻窦手术的顽固性疾病相关的危险因素。基于实体和非实体器官移植进行亚组分析。结果:224例患者中,171/224例(76.3%)行实体移植,53/224例(23.6%)行非实体移植。17.19%的移植受者需要ESS。非实体移植的ESS发生率为28.2%,而实体移植为57%。实体器官移植受者发生难治性CRS的风险几乎是非实体器官移植受者的1.78倍(95% CI, 1.27-2.54, p = 0.0005)。个体因素,如某些免疫治疗药物、全血细胞减少症和排斥反应似乎与非实体和实体器官移植中ESS的风险相关。结论:与接受非实体器官移植的患者相比,实体器官移植患者发生ESS的风险更高。
Risk Factors for Recalcitrant Chronic Rhinosinusitis in Non-Solid and Solid Transplant Recipients.
Objectives: Transplant patients are high risk for surgery due to their immunocompromised state. There is a paucity of evidence concerning the differences in incidence of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) in solid versus non-solid organ transplant. Our aim is to analyze the difference in incidence of CRS requiring endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) between non-solid and solid transplant populations and determine if certain risk factors are associated with increased incidence of recalcitrant CRS in non-solid versus solid transplants.
Study design: Retrospective cohort.
Setting: Multisite tertiary academic center.
Methods: This is a retrospective chart review of 1303 transplant recipients who were seen in our rhinologic clinic for CRS between 2017 and 2022. A total of 224 patients underwent ESS and were further analyzed for risk factors associated with recalcitrant disease requiring sinus surgery. Subgroup analysis based on solid and non-solid organ transplant was performed.
Results: Of the 224 patients in the study, 171/224 (76.3%) had solid transplants while 53/224 (23.6%) had non-solid transplants. 17.19% of all transplant recipients required ESS. The incidence of ESS in non-solid transplants was 28.2% versus 57% in solid transplant. The risk of recalcitrant CRS in solid transplant recipients was almost 1.78 times greater than those with non-solid organ transplant (95% CI, 1.27-2.54, p = 0.0005). Individual factors such as certain immunotherapy drugs, pancytopenia, and rejection appear to correlate with the risk of ESS in both non-solid and solid organ transplant.
Conclusion: Risk of ESS was greater in the solid transplant recipients compared to those who received non-solid organ transplant.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication committed to expanding knowledge and publishing the best clinical and basic research within the fields of Rhinology & Allergy. Its focus is to publish information which contributes to improved quality of care for patients with nasal and sinus disorders. Its primary readership consists of otolaryngologists, allergists, and plastic surgeons. Published material includes peer-reviewed original research, clinical trials, and review articles.