根据肿瘤图个性化治疗膀胱癌的安娜·卡列尼娜原则:哪种药物适合哪种患者?

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Personalized medicine Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.2217/pme-2022-0134
Serdar Celik, Ozde Gokbayrak, Aylin Erol, Kutsal Yorukoglu, Tekincan Aktas, Hilmi Sari, Batuhan Yilmaz, Mehmet Ugur Mungan, Guven Aslan, Ilhan Celebi, Zekiye Altun, Tugba Yavuzsen, Safiye Aktas
{"title":"根据肿瘤图个性化治疗膀胱癌的安娜·卡列尼娜原则:哪种药物适合哪种患者?","authors":"Serdar Celik,&nbsp;Ozde Gokbayrak,&nbsp;Aylin Erol,&nbsp;Kutsal Yorukoglu,&nbsp;Tekincan Aktas,&nbsp;Hilmi Sari,&nbsp;Batuhan Yilmaz,&nbsp;Mehmet Ugur Mungan,&nbsp;Guven Aslan,&nbsp;Ilhan Celebi,&nbsp;Zekiye Altun,&nbsp;Tugba Yavuzsen,&nbsp;Safiye Aktas","doi":"10.2217/pme-2022-0134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> To evaluate the <i>ex vivo</i> efficacy of chemotherapy, immunotherapy and targeted agents with the oncogram method in patients with bladder cancer and determine the most appropriate personalized treatment agent using immune markers. <b>Materials & methods:</b> Bladder cancer tissues were obtained from each patient. After cultivation, cell cultures were divided into 12 groups for each patient and 11 drugs were administered. Cell viability and immunohistochemistry expression were examined. <b>Results:</b> A good response rate was determined to be a 23% viability drop. The nivolumab good response rate was slightly better in PD-L1-positive patients and the ipilimumab good response rate was slightly better in tumoral CTLA-4-positive cases. Interestingly, the cetuximab response was worse in EGFR-positive cases. <b>Conclusion:</b> Although good responses of drug groups after their <i>ex vivo</i> application by using oncogram were found to be higher than control group, this outcome differed on a per patient basis.</p>","PeriodicalId":19753,"journal":{"name":"Personalized medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anna Karenina principle in personalized treatment of bladder cancer according to oncogram: which drug for which patient?\",\"authors\":\"Serdar Celik,&nbsp;Ozde Gokbayrak,&nbsp;Aylin Erol,&nbsp;Kutsal Yorukoglu,&nbsp;Tekincan Aktas,&nbsp;Hilmi Sari,&nbsp;Batuhan Yilmaz,&nbsp;Mehmet Ugur Mungan,&nbsp;Guven Aslan,&nbsp;Ilhan Celebi,&nbsp;Zekiye Altun,&nbsp;Tugba Yavuzsen,&nbsp;Safiye Aktas\",\"doi\":\"10.2217/pme-2022-0134\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> To evaluate the <i>ex vivo</i> efficacy of chemotherapy, immunotherapy and targeted agents with the oncogram method in patients with bladder cancer and determine the most appropriate personalized treatment agent using immune markers. <b>Materials & methods:</b> Bladder cancer tissues were obtained from each patient. After cultivation, cell cultures were divided into 12 groups for each patient and 11 drugs were administered. Cell viability and immunohistochemistry expression were examined. <b>Results:</b> A good response rate was determined to be a 23% viability drop. The nivolumab good response rate was slightly better in PD-L1-positive patients and the ipilimumab good response rate was slightly better in tumoral CTLA-4-positive cases. Interestingly, the cetuximab response was worse in EGFR-positive cases. <b>Conclusion:</b> Although good responses of drug groups after their <i>ex vivo</i> application by using oncogram were found to be higher than control group, this outcome differed on a per patient basis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Personalized medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Personalized medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2217/pme-2022-0134\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personalized medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2217/pme-2022-0134","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:用肿瘤图法评价膀胱癌患者化疗、免疫治疗和靶向药物的体外疗效,利用免疫标志物确定最合适的个体化治疗药物。材料与方法:每位患者取膀胱癌组织。培养后,每个患者将细胞培养物分为12组,给予11种药物。检测细胞活力和免疫组化表达。结果:生存能力下降23%为良好反应率。尼武单抗在pd - l1阳性患者中的良好反应率略好,伊匹单抗在肿瘤ctla -4阳性患者中的良好反应率略好。有趣的是,西妥昔单抗在egfr阳性病例中的反应更差。结论:尽管通过肿瘤图发现药物组在体外应用后的良好反应高于对照组,但这一结果在每个患者的基础上有所不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Anna Karenina principle in personalized treatment of bladder cancer according to oncogram: which drug for which patient?

Aim: To evaluate the ex vivo efficacy of chemotherapy, immunotherapy and targeted agents with the oncogram method in patients with bladder cancer and determine the most appropriate personalized treatment agent using immune markers. Materials & methods: Bladder cancer tissues were obtained from each patient. After cultivation, cell cultures were divided into 12 groups for each patient and 11 drugs were administered. Cell viability and immunohistochemistry expression were examined. Results: A good response rate was determined to be a 23% viability drop. The nivolumab good response rate was slightly better in PD-L1-positive patients and the ipilimumab good response rate was slightly better in tumoral CTLA-4-positive cases. Interestingly, the cetuximab response was worse in EGFR-positive cases. Conclusion: Although good responses of drug groups after their ex vivo application by using oncogram were found to be higher than control group, this outcome differed on a per patient basis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Personalized medicine
Personalized medicine 医学-药学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
49
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Personalized Medicine (ISSN 1741-0541) translates recent genomic, genetic and proteomic advances into the clinical context. The journal provides an integrated forum for all players involved - academic and clinical researchers, pharmaceutical companies, regulatory authorities, healthcare management organizations, patient organizations and others in the healthcare community. Personalized Medicine assists these parties to shape thefuture of medicine by providing a platform for expert commentary and analysis. The journal addresses scientific, commercial and policy issues in the field of precision medicine and includes news and views, current awareness regarding new biomarkers, concise commentary and analysis, reports from the conference circuit and full review articles.
期刊最新文献
Improving resource allocation in the precision medicine Era: a simulation-based approach using R Challenges and opportunities in building a health economic framework for personalized medicine in oncology. Developing and validating noninvasive prenatal testing for de novo autosomal dominant monogenic diseases in Vietnam. Budget impact and transferability of cost-effectiveness of DPYD testing in metastatic breast cancer in three health systems. Financial incentives to promote personalized medicine in Europe: an overview and guidance for implementation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1