用于 HDR 近距离放射治疗的 PenRed 蒙地卡罗框架基准测试

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.11.002
Sandra Oliver , Vicent Giménez-Alventosa , Francisco Berumen , Vicente Gimenez , Luc Beaulieu , Facundo Ballester , Javier Vijande
{"title":"用于 HDR 近距离放射治疗的 PenRed 蒙地卡罗框架基准测试","authors":"Sandra Oliver ,&nbsp;Vicent Giménez-Alventosa ,&nbsp;Francisco Berumen ,&nbsp;Vicente Gimenez ,&nbsp;Luc Beaulieu ,&nbsp;Facundo Ballester ,&nbsp;Javier Vijande","doi":"10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The purpose of this study is to validate the PenRed Monte Carlo framework for clinical applications in brachytherapy. PenRed is a C++ version of Penelope Monte Carlo code with additional tallies and utilities.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and materials</h3><p>Six benchmarking scenarios are explored to validate the use of PenRed and its improved bachytherapy-oriented capabilities for HDR brachytherapy. A new tally allowing the evaluation of collisional kerma for any material using the track length kerma estimator and the possibility to obtain the seed positions, weights and directions processing directly the DICOM file are now implemented in the PenRed distribution. The four non-clinical test cases developed by the Joint AAPM-ESTRO-ABG-ABS WG-DCAB were evaluated by comparing local and global absorbed dose differences with respect to established reference datasets. A prostate and a palliative lung cases, were also studied. For them, absorbed dose ratios, global absorbed dose differences, and cumulative dose-volume histograms were obtained and discussed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The air-kerma strength and the dose rate constant corresponding to the two sources agree with the reference datatests within 0.3% (<span><math><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>S</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>k</mi></mrow></msub></mrow></math></span>) and 0.1% (<span><math><mrow><mi>Λ</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow></math></span>. With respect to the first three WG-DCAB test cases, more than 99.8% of the voxels present local (global) differences within <span><math><mrow><mo>±</mo><mn>1</mn><mo>%</mo></mrow></math></span>(<span><math><mrow><mo>±</mo><mn>0.1</mn><mo>%</mo></mrow></math></span>) of the reference datasets. For test Case 4 reference dataset, more than 94.9%(97.5%) of voxels show an agreement within <span><math><mrow><mo>±</mo><mn>1</mn><mo>%</mo></mrow></math></span>(<span><math><mrow><mo>±</mo><mn>0.1</mn><mo>%</mo></mrow></math></span>), better than similar benchmarking calculations in the literature. The track length kerma estimator scorer implemented increases the numerical efficiency of brachytherapy calculations two orders of magnitude, while the specific brachytherapy source allows the user to avoid the use of error-prone intermediate steps to translate the DICOM information into the simulation. In both clinical cases, only minor absorbed dose differences arise in the low-dose isodoses. 99.8% and 100% of the voxels have a global absorbed dose difference ratio within <span><math><mrow><mo>±</mo><mn>0.2</mn><mo>%</mo></mrow></math></span> for the prostate and lung cases, respectively. The role played by the different segmentation and composition material in the bone structures was discussed, obtaining negligible absorbed dose differences. Dose-volume histograms were in agreement with the reference data.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>PenRed incorporates new tallies and utilities and has been validated for its use for detailed and precise high-dose-rate brachytherapy simulations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54397,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939388922001040/pdfft?md5=c747742a19f7b02d767f19528d0430ad&pid=1-s2.0-S0939388922001040-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Benchmark of the PenRed Monte Carlo framework for HDR brachytherapy\",\"authors\":\"Sandra Oliver ,&nbsp;Vicent Giménez-Alventosa ,&nbsp;Francisco Berumen ,&nbsp;Vicente Gimenez ,&nbsp;Luc Beaulieu ,&nbsp;Facundo Ballester ,&nbsp;Javier Vijande\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.11.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The purpose of this study is to validate the PenRed Monte Carlo framework for clinical applications in brachytherapy. PenRed is a C++ version of Penelope Monte Carlo code with additional tallies and utilities.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and materials</h3><p>Six benchmarking scenarios are explored to validate the use of PenRed and its improved bachytherapy-oriented capabilities for HDR brachytherapy. A new tally allowing the evaluation of collisional kerma for any material using the track length kerma estimator and the possibility to obtain the seed positions, weights and directions processing directly the DICOM file are now implemented in the PenRed distribution. The four non-clinical test cases developed by the Joint AAPM-ESTRO-ABG-ABS WG-DCAB were evaluated by comparing local and global absorbed dose differences with respect to established reference datasets. A prostate and a palliative lung cases, were also studied. For them, absorbed dose ratios, global absorbed dose differences, and cumulative dose-volume histograms were obtained and discussed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The air-kerma strength and the dose rate constant corresponding to the two sources agree with the reference datatests within 0.3% (<span><math><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>S</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>k</mi></mrow></msub></mrow></math></span>) and 0.1% (<span><math><mrow><mi>Λ</mi><mo>)</mo></mrow></math></span>. With respect to the first three WG-DCAB test cases, more than 99.8% of the voxels present local (global) differences within <span><math><mrow><mo>±</mo><mn>1</mn><mo>%</mo></mrow></math></span>(<span><math><mrow><mo>±</mo><mn>0.1</mn><mo>%</mo></mrow></math></span>) of the reference datasets. For test Case 4 reference dataset, more than 94.9%(97.5%) of voxels show an agreement within <span><math><mrow><mo>±</mo><mn>1</mn><mo>%</mo></mrow></math></span>(<span><math><mrow><mo>±</mo><mn>0.1</mn><mo>%</mo></mrow></math></span>), better than similar benchmarking calculations in the literature. The track length kerma estimator scorer implemented increases the numerical efficiency of brachytherapy calculations two orders of magnitude, while the specific brachytherapy source allows the user to avoid the use of error-prone intermediate steps to translate the DICOM information into the simulation. In both clinical cases, only minor absorbed dose differences arise in the low-dose isodoses. 99.8% and 100% of the voxels have a global absorbed dose difference ratio within <span><math><mrow><mo>±</mo><mn>0.2</mn><mo>%</mo></mrow></math></span> for the prostate and lung cases, respectively. The role played by the different segmentation and composition material in the bone structures was discussed, obtaining negligible absorbed dose differences. Dose-volume histograms were in agreement with the reference data.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>PenRed incorporates new tallies and utilities and has been validated for its use for detailed and precise high-dose-rate brachytherapy simulations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54397,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939388922001040/pdfft?md5=c747742a19f7b02d767f19528d0430ad&pid=1-s2.0-S0939388922001040-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939388922001040\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939388922001040","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究旨在验证 PenRed 蒙特卡罗框架在近距离放射治疗中的临床应用。PenRed 是 Penelope Monte Carlo 代码的 C++ 版本,增加了额外的统计量和实用程序。方法和材料探讨了六种基准情景,以验证 PenRed 及其改进的面向近距离放射治疗的功能在 HDR 近距离放射治疗中的应用。PenRed 发行版中新增了一项统计功能,允许使用轨迹长度 Kerma 估算器评估任何材料的碰撞 Kerma,并可直接从 DICOM 文件中获取种子位置、权重和方向。由 AAPM-ESTRO-ABG-ABS WG-DCAB 联合小组开发的四个非临床测试案例通过比较与已建立的参考数据集的局部和全局吸收剂量差异进行了评估。还研究了一个前列腺和一个肺部姑息治疗病例。结果 两个放射源对应的空气凯玛强度和剂量率常数与参考数据的一致性在 0.3%(Sk)和 0.1%(Λ)以内。在前三个 WG-DCAB 测试案例中,99.8% 以上的体素与参考数据集的局部(全局)差异在 ±1%(±0.1%)以内。对于测试案例 4 参考数据集,94.9%(97.5%)以上的体素显示出±1%(±0.1%)以内的一致性,优于文献中的类似基准计算。所采用的轨迹长度Kerma估计计分器将近距离治疗计算的数值效率提高了两个数量级,而特定的近距离治疗源可让用户避免使用容易出错的中间步骤将DICOM信息转化为模拟结果。在这两种临床案例中,低剂量等剂量的吸收剂量差异很小。在前列腺和肺部病例中,分别有 99.8% 和 100% 的体素的全局吸收剂量差异比在±0.2%以内。讨论了骨骼结构中不同分割和组成材料所起的作用,得出的吸收剂量差异可以忽略不计。剂量-体积直方图与参考数据一致。结论PenRed 加入了新的统计和实用程序,并已通过验证,可用于详细、精确的高剂量率近距离放射模拟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Benchmark of the PenRed Monte Carlo framework for HDR brachytherapy

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to validate the PenRed Monte Carlo framework for clinical applications in brachytherapy. PenRed is a C++ version of Penelope Monte Carlo code with additional tallies and utilities.

Methods and materials

Six benchmarking scenarios are explored to validate the use of PenRed and its improved bachytherapy-oriented capabilities for HDR brachytherapy. A new tally allowing the evaluation of collisional kerma for any material using the track length kerma estimator and the possibility to obtain the seed positions, weights and directions processing directly the DICOM file are now implemented in the PenRed distribution. The four non-clinical test cases developed by the Joint AAPM-ESTRO-ABG-ABS WG-DCAB were evaluated by comparing local and global absorbed dose differences with respect to established reference datasets. A prostate and a palliative lung cases, were also studied. For them, absorbed dose ratios, global absorbed dose differences, and cumulative dose-volume histograms were obtained and discussed.

Results

The air-kerma strength and the dose rate constant corresponding to the two sources agree with the reference datatests within 0.3% (Sk) and 0.1% (Λ). With respect to the first three WG-DCAB test cases, more than 99.8% of the voxels present local (global) differences within ±1%(±0.1%) of the reference datasets. For test Case 4 reference dataset, more than 94.9%(97.5%) of voxels show an agreement within ±1%(±0.1%), better than similar benchmarking calculations in the literature. The track length kerma estimator scorer implemented increases the numerical efficiency of brachytherapy calculations two orders of magnitude, while the specific brachytherapy source allows the user to avoid the use of error-prone intermediate steps to translate the DICOM information into the simulation. In both clinical cases, only minor absorbed dose differences arise in the low-dose isodoses. 99.8% and 100% of the voxels have a global absorbed dose difference ratio within ±0.2% for the prostate and lung cases, respectively. The role played by the different segmentation and composition material in the bone structures was discussed, obtaining negligible absorbed dose differences. Dose-volume histograms were in agreement with the reference data.

Conclusions

PenRed incorporates new tallies and utilities and has been validated for its use for detailed and precise high-dose-rate brachytherapy simulations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik (Journal of Medical Physics) is an official organ of the German and Austrian Society of Medical Physic and the Swiss Society of Radiobiology and Medical Physics.The Journal is a platform for basic research and practical applications of physical procedures in medical diagnostics and therapy. The articles are reviewed following international standards of peer reviewing. Focuses of the articles are: -Biophysical methods in radiation therapy and nuclear medicine -Dosimetry and radiation protection -Radiological diagnostics and quality assurance -Modern imaging techniques, such as computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography -Ultrasonography diagnostics, application of laser and UV rays -Electronic processing of biosignals -Artificial intelligence and machine learning in medical physics In the Journal, the latest scientific insights find their expression in the form of original articles, reviews, technical communications, and information for the clinical practice.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Contents Development and clinical implementation of a digital system for risk assessments for radiation therapy End-to-end testing for stereotactic radiotherapy including the development of a Multi-Modality phantom Note on uncertainty in Monte Carlo dose calculations and its relation to microdosimetry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1