直接检测减少了调查和治疗的时间。

Q3 Medicine Ulster Medical Journal Pub Date : 2022-09-01
R S Wilson, D B Johnston, D McKay, D Mark
{"title":"直接检测减少了调查和治疗的时间。","authors":"R S Wilson,&nbsp;D B Johnston,&nbsp;D McKay,&nbsp;D Mark","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Straight to test (STT) is a recognised pathway for improving the waiting time for red flag referrals. Electronic patient care records (ECR) provide clinicians with a greater volume of clinical information allowing virtual triage and STT. We aimed to assess if using ECR and STT can reduce delays in diagnosis and treatment. A review of 300 colorectal referrals between 2018-2019 was performed. Patients awaiting an appointment were reviewed electronically, by a single colorectal surgeon and re-triaged STT if appropriate. The delay in time from referral to initial review was removed, creating a second group for statistical comparison to demonstrate time saved if the strategy was adopted at the point of original triage. 91.3% (n= 274) were red flag referrals. 94% (n=282) were sent STT. Patients processed via traditional referral and clinic had a median time to scope of 36 days compared with 22.5 days, p < 0.001 if triaged STT via virtual clinic. Median time to management was 59 days for traditional and 35 days for STT, p < 0.001.</p>","PeriodicalId":38815,"journal":{"name":"Ulster Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/cb/f5/umj-91-03-139.PMC9720590.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Straight to test reduces time to investigation and treatment.\",\"authors\":\"R S Wilson,&nbsp;D B Johnston,&nbsp;D McKay,&nbsp;D Mark\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Straight to test (STT) is a recognised pathway for improving the waiting time for red flag referrals. Electronic patient care records (ECR) provide clinicians with a greater volume of clinical information allowing virtual triage and STT. We aimed to assess if using ECR and STT can reduce delays in diagnosis and treatment. A review of 300 colorectal referrals between 2018-2019 was performed. Patients awaiting an appointment were reviewed electronically, by a single colorectal surgeon and re-triaged STT if appropriate. The delay in time from referral to initial review was removed, creating a second group for statistical comparison to demonstrate time saved if the strategy was adopted at the point of original triage. 91.3% (n= 274) were red flag referrals. 94% (n=282) were sent STT. Patients processed via traditional referral and clinic had a median time to scope of 36 days compared with 22.5 days, p < 0.001 if triaged STT via virtual clinic. Median time to management was 59 days for traditional and 35 days for STT, p < 0.001.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38815,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ulster Medical Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/cb/f5/umj-91-03-139.PMC9720590.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ulster Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ulster Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

直接测试(STT)是公认的改善红旗转介等待时间的途径。电子患者护理记录(ECR)为临床医生提供了更大量的临床信息,允许虚拟分诊和STT。我们的目的是评估使用ECR和STT是否可以减少诊断和治疗的延误。对2018-2019年间300例结直肠转诊进行了回顾。等待预约的患者由一名结直肠外科医生进行电子检查,并在适当的情况下对STT进行重新分类。从转诊到初步审查的时间延迟已被消除,创建了第二组进行统计比较,以证明如果在最初分诊时采用该策略所节省的时间。91.3% (n= 274)为危险信号转诊。94% (n=282)接受STT治疗。通过传统转诊和诊所处理的患者的中位时间为36天,而通过虚拟诊所进行STT分类的患者为22.5天,p < 0.001。到治疗的中位时间为传统治疗59天,STT治疗35天,p < 0.001。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Straight to test reduces time to investigation and treatment.

Straight to test (STT) is a recognised pathway for improving the waiting time for red flag referrals. Electronic patient care records (ECR) provide clinicians with a greater volume of clinical information allowing virtual triage and STT. We aimed to assess if using ECR and STT can reduce delays in diagnosis and treatment. A review of 300 colorectal referrals between 2018-2019 was performed. Patients awaiting an appointment were reviewed electronically, by a single colorectal surgeon and re-triaged STT if appropriate. The delay in time from referral to initial review was removed, creating a second group for statistical comparison to demonstrate time saved if the strategy was adopted at the point of original triage. 91.3% (n= 274) were red flag referrals. 94% (n=282) were sent STT. Patients processed via traditional referral and clinic had a median time to scope of 36 days compared with 22.5 days, p < 0.001 if triaged STT via virtual clinic. Median time to management was 59 days for traditional and 35 days for STT, p < 0.001.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ulster Medical Journal
Ulster Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
期刊最新文献
The Long-Term and Late Effects of the Diagnosis and Treatment of Colorectal Cancer. Mapping Two Decades of Paediatric Down Syndrome Research Literature. Northern Ireland Healthcare Crisis. 'Factors influencing future career choices of Queen's University Belfast Medical students.' Thirty Nobel Prizes: Cavendish Crocodiles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1