Ulster Medical Journal最新文献

Precis: COVID-19 has had a significant impact on the waiting times for cervical screening and colposcopy but no impact on the severity of disease outcomes.

Abstract: Objectives/Purposes of the study:: To assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the cervical screening programme and colposcopy services in Northern Ireland.Methods: All new patients referred to colposcopy following an abnormal cervical smear result from September to November 2019 and 2020 were included. Review patients and those referred to colposcopy for another indication in the same time frame were excluded. Data collected included the presenting smear result and the time to report, time interval to colposcopy review, cervical biopsy method, result and the time to report. Statistical analysis was performed using JASP (JASP V.0.16.1, 2022) and included Shapiro-Wilk normality test and Mann-Whitney U test to compare means.Results: There was an 11% reduction in the number of presenting cervical smears (7155 vs 6379) in 2020 with a 46% reduction (158 vs 85) in the number of colposcopy referrals. In 2020 there was a mean increase of 6 days to report the presenting smear (P<0.01), mean decrease of 49 days to attend colposcopy (P<0.01) and a mean decrease of 36 days to report the cervical biopsy result (P<0.01). An increase of 14 days (P= 0.01) and 15 days (P=0.01) respectively to attend colposcopy for moderate and severe dyskaryosis in 2020. No statistical difference was seen in the frequency of presenting smear results, method of cervical biopsy and cervical biopsy results in 2020.Conclusion: COVID-19 has had a significant impact on the number of patients referred to colposcopy and the time intervals in cervical screening but no significant short term impact on the severity of disease outcomes.

Background: Colorectal cancer is the 3rd most common cancer in the UK. Through early detection and improved treatments more people than ever are surviving this disease. Surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy are the cornerstones of management, but these invasive treatments can cause a number of long-term and late effects. Using qualitative methods this study aimed to; explore peoples experiences with long-term and late effects of colorectal cancer, how these effects impacted on their lives and how participants managed them.

Method: Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 15 participants who had completed curative treatment. Interviews were transcribed and analysed using the Framework approach to identify themes and categorise text data.

Results: Many long-term and late effects of colorectal cancer were explored including bowel dysfunction, sexual dysfunction, pain, metastatic disease and cognitive dysfunction. These effects caused distress for many and were linked to depression and social limitation. Previously unidentified long-term effects included decreased libido and joint pain which respondents attributed to chemotherapy. Anxiety and depression were found predominantly to be late effects. Management of long-term and late effects was varied with healthcare services often ineffective.

Conclusion: Insight gained into long-term and late effects and their treatment, indicated that many participants suffered because of their after-effects and had unmet health needs. It adds a qualitative insight into an area where quantitative research has already been conducted. Improvements in cancer follow-up could offer opportunities to effectively identify, manage and monitor these effects. Further interventional studies are required to develop effective care pathways to achieve optimal care.

Background: While research has led to significant advancements in the health and life expectancy of children with Down Syndrome (DS), there remains a significant burden of disease and health inequity. Further research, focused on areas of greatest need, is imperative to address this. An understanding of what research has been undertaken, and any existing gaps, helps to guide future academic efforts.

Methods: We utilised an epistemological approach to summarise two decades of paediatric DS literature. Publications were categorised according to the country of origin, methodology, primary health themes and subcategory research themes.

Results: Across 5,800 paediatric DS publications we demonstrate a general increase in the number of publications in this field between 2000 and 2014, with a trending decline thereafter. The majority of publications were affiliated with Institutions based in Western countries. The majority of studies utilised a cross-sectional methodology (33.3%), while relatively few were interventional (5.6%), qualitative (2.7%) or mixed-method studies (1.6%). Most publications focused on development & cognition (13.1%), neurology (9.9%) and oncology (9.8%), with fewer focusing on genitourinary health (0.9%), growth (0.9%), mortality (0.9%) and child protection (0.2%).

Conclusion: These findings highlight areas of relative paucity within the paediatric DS literature which may warrant increased academic attention.

Introduction: The Achieve, Develop, Explore Programme for Trainees (ADEPT) Clinical Leadership Fellowship Programme was established in response to growing recommendations to underpin healthcare reconfiguration in Northern Ireland with a collective leadership strategy. The fellowship combines a leadership development programme with a project carried out within a host organisation. With the fellowship now in its sixth year, a need was identified to assess its impact on the fellows' leadership skills, career choices, achievements, and views on both the fellowship and how to develop future leaders.

Methods: Demographic data for all ADEPT fellows was held centrally through Northern Ireland Medical and Dental Training Agency (NIMDTA) and assessed anonymously. A mixed-methods questionnaire was composed using Smart Survey. Likert scale questions were designed to determine the extent to which participants believed ADEPT supported their development of strong and exemplary elements of the nine dimensions of the NHS Healthcare Leadership Model. The questionnaire was distributed electronically to all ADEPT alumni in November 2021 and remained open for 4 weeks.

Results: There have been 46 ADEPT fellows to date (72% female; all fellows were white). ADEPT fellows were most commonly from Psychiatry (33%), Paediatrics (17%) and Obstetrics and Gynaecology (15%). There were 19 responses from the alumni cohort of 46 (41%). 75% of respondents reported that their project resulted in publication, presentation or award. Leadership skill development was identified as best in "Evaluating Information" and "Engaging the Team", whereas skills in "Sharing the Vision" and "Developing Capability" saw less improvement. The majority felt that the fellowship had been useful in securing their position as a consultant or general practitioner and 50% went on to pursue senior leadership positions.

Conclusion: The ADEPT Clinical Leadership Fellowship delivers effective leadership training as measured by the nine domains of the NHS Healthcare Leadership Model. It provides value for host organisations through the projects undertaken and by developing doctors who are more likely to engage in future formal leadership roles. ADEPT alumni saw the value in their leadership experience and felt it should be embedded in standard postgraduate training schemes to reach a wider audience.

Introduction: Decisions made by medical students on future career choice have demonstrated concordance with subsequent postgraduate career path. This study aimed to understand the factors that impact undergraduate career decision making.

Methods: An anonymous voluntary survey consisting of binominal, Likert and free text responses was distributed to all medical students registered at Queen's University Belfast (QUB). Data was collected over 6 weeks in April-May 2021. The primary outcome was future career aspirations. The secondary outcomes were the impact of mentorship on career choice, the likelihood of students completing their medical degree and practicing medicine upon graduation. Local ethical approval was obtained.

Results: 202 responses were received (response rate 15%). 67% (n = 135) were female. One third of respondents remained undecided about their future career choice. Surgery was both the most popular definite career choice (16.3%) of respondents, butalsothespecialtymarkedmostoftenas'Least preferred Specialty' (33%). Factors positively influencing career choice were academic interest and flexibility in working hours. Negative predictors of career choice were lack of interest in the area, perceived workload, and duration of training schemes. 71% (n=144) of respondents reported that a subspecialty mentor would positively influence their career choice and two-thirds of respondents reported that financial factors would influence their career decision. 11% (n= 22) of respondents were unsure or undecided if they would continue medicine as a career upon graduation.

Conclusion: Uncertainty over future career intention remains common with surgery the least popular speciality. Mentorship, integrating flexibility in training and enhancing academic interest should be considered by educational stakeholders as mechanisms to generating undergraduate interest in a subspecialty. Furthermore, the reported rate of students intention to leave their medical degree prior to graduation by this cohort is concerning, warranting further investigation.