ClusterDE:一种对双浸渍引起的假阳性膨胀具有鲁棒性的聚类后差异表达(DE)方法。

Dongyuan Song, Siqi Chen, Christy Lee, Kexin Li, Xinzhou Ge, Jingyi Jessica Li
{"title":"ClusterDE:一种对双浸渍引起的假阳性膨胀具有鲁棒性的聚类后差异表达(DE)方法。","authors":"Dongyuan Song, Siqi Chen, Christy Lee, Kexin Li, Xinzhou Ge, Jingyi Jessica Li","doi":"10.1101/2023.07.21.550107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Double dipping is a well-known pitfall in single-cell and spatial transcriptomics data analysis: after a clustering algorithm finds clusters as putative cell types or spatial domains, statistical tests are applied to the same data to identify differentially expressed (DE) genes as potential cell-type or spatial-domain markers. Because the genes that contribute to clustering are inherently likely to be identified as DE genes, double dipping can result in false-positive cell-type or spatial-domain markers, especially when clusters are spurious, leading to ambiguously defined cell types or spatial domains. To address this challenge, we propose ClusterDE, a statistical method designed to identify post-clustering DE genes as reliable markers of cell types and spatial domains, while controlling the false discovery rate (FDR) regardless of clustering quality. The core of ClusterDE involves generating synthetic null data as an <i>in silico</i> negative control that contains only one cell type or spatial domain, allowing for the detection and removal of spurious discoveries caused by double dipping. We demonstrate that ClusterDE controls the FDR and identifies canonical cell-type and spatial-domain markers as top DE genes, distinguishing them from housekeeping genes. ClusterDE's ability to discover reliable markers, or the absence of such markers, can be used to determine whether two ambiguous clusters should be merged. Additionally, ClusterDE is compatible with state-of-the-art analysis pipelines like Seurat and Scanpy.</p>","PeriodicalId":72407,"journal":{"name":"bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/91/79/nihpp-2023.07.21.550107v1.PMC10401959.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Synthetic control removes spurious discoveries from double dipping in single-cell and spatial transcriptomics data analyses.\",\"authors\":\"Dongyuan Song, Siqi Chen, Christy Lee, Kexin Li, Xinzhou Ge, Jingyi Jessica Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2023.07.21.550107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Double dipping is a well-known pitfall in single-cell and spatial transcriptomics data analysis: after a clustering algorithm finds clusters as putative cell types or spatial domains, statistical tests are applied to the same data to identify differentially expressed (DE) genes as potential cell-type or spatial-domain markers. Because the genes that contribute to clustering are inherently likely to be identified as DE genes, double dipping can result in false-positive cell-type or spatial-domain markers, especially when clusters are spurious, leading to ambiguously defined cell types or spatial domains. To address this challenge, we propose ClusterDE, a statistical method designed to identify post-clustering DE genes as reliable markers of cell types and spatial domains, while controlling the false discovery rate (FDR) regardless of clustering quality. The core of ClusterDE involves generating synthetic null data as an <i>in silico</i> negative control that contains only one cell type or spatial domain, allowing for the detection and removal of spurious discoveries caused by double dipping. We demonstrate that ClusterDE controls the FDR and identifies canonical cell-type and spatial-domain markers as top DE genes, distinguishing them from housekeeping genes. ClusterDE's ability to discover reliable markers, or the absence of such markers, can be used to determine whether two ambiguous clusters should be merged. Additionally, ClusterDE is compatible with state-of-the-art analysis pipelines like Seurat and Scanpy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/91/79/nihpp-2023.07.21.550107v1.PMC10401959.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.07.21.550107\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.07.21.550107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在典型的单细胞RNA-seq(scRNA-seq)数据分析中,应用聚类算法来寻找作为聚类的假定细胞类型,然后使用统计差异表达(DE)测试来识别细胞聚类之间的差异表达(DE)基因。然而,这种常见的程序两次使用相同的数据,这一问题被称为“双重浸渍”:相同的数据用于定义细胞簇和DE基因,即使细胞簇是假的,也会导致假阳性DE基因。为了克服这一挑战,我们提出了ClusterDE,这是一种聚类后DE测试,用于控制已识别的DE基因的错误发现率(FDR),而不考虑聚类质量。ClusterDE的核心思想是生成只有一个聚类的基于真实数据的合成空数据,作为与真实数据相反的反事实,用于评估聚类的整个过程,然后进行DE测试。通过综合模拟和真实数据分析,我们表明ClusterDE不仅具有稳固的FDR控制,而且能够找到具有生物学意义的细胞类型标记基因。ClusterDE快速、透明,适用于各种聚类算法和DE测试。除了scRNA-seq数据外,ClusterDE通常适用于聚类后的DE分析,包括单细胞多组学数据分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Synthetic control removes spurious discoveries from double dipping in single-cell and spatial transcriptomics data analyses.

Double dipping is a well-known pitfall in single-cell and spatial transcriptomics data analysis: after a clustering algorithm finds clusters as putative cell types or spatial domains, statistical tests are applied to the same data to identify differentially expressed (DE) genes as potential cell-type or spatial-domain markers. Because the genes that contribute to clustering are inherently likely to be identified as DE genes, double dipping can result in false-positive cell-type or spatial-domain markers, especially when clusters are spurious, leading to ambiguously defined cell types or spatial domains. To address this challenge, we propose ClusterDE, a statistical method designed to identify post-clustering DE genes as reliable markers of cell types and spatial domains, while controlling the false discovery rate (FDR) regardless of clustering quality. The core of ClusterDE involves generating synthetic null data as an in silico negative control that contains only one cell type or spatial domain, allowing for the detection and removal of spurious discoveries caused by double dipping. We demonstrate that ClusterDE controls the FDR and identifies canonical cell-type and spatial-domain markers as top DE genes, distinguishing them from housekeeping genes. ClusterDE's ability to discover reliable markers, or the absence of such markers, can be used to determine whether two ambiguous clusters should be merged. Additionally, ClusterDE is compatible with state-of-the-art analysis pipelines like Seurat and Scanpy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Self-supervised segmentation and characterization of fiber bundles in anatomic tracing data. Single neuron contributions to the auditory brainstem EEG. Neural substrates of cold nociception in Drosophila larva. Inversions Can Accumulate Balanced Sexual Antagonism: Evidence from Simulations and Drosophila Experiments. Programming megakaryocytes to produce engineered platelets for delivering non-native proteins.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1