{"title":"改用多替格拉韦/拉米夫定或比替格拉韦/恩曲他滨/替诺福韦阿拉芬胺。一个比较现实世界的研究。","authors":"Hernando Knobel, Esperanza Cañas-Ruano, Ana Guelar, Pablo Knobel, Judit Villar-García, Alicia González-Mena, Ceclia Canepa, Itziar Arrieta-Aldea, Augustin Marcos, Agustí Abalat-Torrres, Roberto Güerri-Fernández","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This real-world study compared the safety and effectiveness of Dolutegravir/lamivudine (D/L) and Bictegravir/Emtricitabine/Tenefovir alafenamide (B/F/T) switch therapy regimens for people living with HIV (PLWH).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The retrospective study conducted from April 2019 to November 2022, included PLWH with < 50 copies/mL of HIV-RNA prior to recruitment who initiated either D/L or B/F/T switching therapy. The primary objective was to evaluate treatment discontinuation rates; safety and virologic outcomes were also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>690 PLWH were included, 358 in the D/L and 332 in the B/F/T, and a median follow-up of 728 and 1013 days, respectively. The discontinuation proportions were 8.7% (31 participants, incidence rate of 4.44 per 100 PYFU in the D/L group and 15.3% (51 participants, incidence rate of 6.25 per 100 PYFU) in the B/F/T group. The adjusted hazard ratio for B/F/T discontinuation compared to D/L was 1.20 (95% CI: 0.71;2.0; <i>p</i> = 0.494). Virologic failure (VL > 200 copies/mL in two consecutive measurements) occurred in 1.1% and 0.9% of patients in the D/L and B/F/T groups, respectively. Notably, one patient in D/L group with severe non-adherence and virologic failure developed resistance mutations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Switching to either B/T/F or D/L treatment for PLWH was effective and well tolerated in this real-world study. Treatment discontinuation rates did not significantly differ between the two regimens.</p>","PeriodicalId":13165,"journal":{"name":"HIV Research & Clinical Practice","volume":"24 1","pages":"2239564"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Switching to Dolutegravir/lamivudine or Bictegravir/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir alafenamide. A comparative real-world study.\",\"authors\":\"Hernando Knobel, Esperanza Cañas-Ruano, Ana Guelar, Pablo Knobel, Judit Villar-García, Alicia González-Mena, Ceclia Canepa, Itziar Arrieta-Aldea, Augustin Marcos, Agustí Abalat-Torrres, Roberto Güerri-Fernández\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This real-world study compared the safety and effectiveness of Dolutegravir/lamivudine (D/L) and Bictegravir/Emtricitabine/Tenefovir alafenamide (B/F/T) switch therapy regimens for people living with HIV (PLWH).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The retrospective study conducted from April 2019 to November 2022, included PLWH with < 50 copies/mL of HIV-RNA prior to recruitment who initiated either D/L or B/F/T switching therapy. The primary objective was to evaluate treatment discontinuation rates; safety and virologic outcomes were also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>690 PLWH were included, 358 in the D/L and 332 in the B/F/T, and a median follow-up of 728 and 1013 days, respectively. The discontinuation proportions were 8.7% (31 participants, incidence rate of 4.44 per 100 PYFU in the D/L group and 15.3% (51 participants, incidence rate of 6.25 per 100 PYFU) in the B/F/T group. The adjusted hazard ratio for B/F/T discontinuation compared to D/L was 1.20 (95% CI: 0.71;2.0; <i>p</i> = 0.494). Virologic failure (VL > 200 copies/mL in two consecutive measurements) occurred in 1.1% and 0.9% of patients in the D/L and B/F/T groups, respectively. Notably, one patient in D/L group with severe non-adherence and virologic failure developed resistance mutations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Switching to either B/T/F or D/L treatment for PLWH was effective and well tolerated in this real-world study. Treatment discontinuation rates did not significantly differ between the two regimens.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13165,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HIV Research & Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"2239564\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HIV Research & Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HIV Research & Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Switching to Dolutegravir/lamivudine or Bictegravir/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir alafenamide. A comparative real-world study.
Background: This real-world study compared the safety and effectiveness of Dolutegravir/lamivudine (D/L) and Bictegravir/Emtricitabine/Tenefovir alafenamide (B/F/T) switch therapy regimens for people living with HIV (PLWH).
Methods: The retrospective study conducted from April 2019 to November 2022, included PLWH with < 50 copies/mL of HIV-RNA prior to recruitment who initiated either D/L or B/F/T switching therapy. The primary objective was to evaluate treatment discontinuation rates; safety and virologic outcomes were also evaluated.
Results: 690 PLWH were included, 358 in the D/L and 332 in the B/F/T, and a median follow-up of 728 and 1013 days, respectively. The discontinuation proportions were 8.7% (31 participants, incidence rate of 4.44 per 100 PYFU in the D/L group and 15.3% (51 participants, incidence rate of 6.25 per 100 PYFU) in the B/F/T group. The adjusted hazard ratio for B/F/T discontinuation compared to D/L was 1.20 (95% CI: 0.71;2.0; p = 0.494). Virologic failure (VL > 200 copies/mL in two consecutive measurements) occurred in 1.1% and 0.9% of patients in the D/L and B/F/T groups, respectively. Notably, one patient in D/L group with severe non-adherence and virologic failure developed resistance mutations.
Conclusions: Switching to either B/T/F or D/L treatment for PLWH was effective and well tolerated in this real-world study. Treatment discontinuation rates did not significantly differ between the two regimens.