数字卫生公平:解决权力,可用性和信任,以加强卫生系统。

Han Koehle, Clair Kronk, Young Ji Lee
{"title":"数字卫生公平:解决权力,可用性和信任,以加强卫生系统。","authors":"Han Koehle,&nbsp;Clair Kronk,&nbsp;Young Ji Lee","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1742512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Without specific attention to health equity considerations in design, implementation, and evaluation, the rapid expansion of digital health approaches threatens to exacerbate rather than ameliorate existing health disparities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We explored known factors that increase digital health inequity to contextualize the need for equity-centered informatics. This work used a narrative review method to summarize issues about inequities in digital health and to discuss future directions for researchers and clinicians. We searched literature using a combination of relevant keywords (e.g., \"digital health\", \"health equity\", etc.) using PubMed and Google Scholar.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We have highlighted strategies for addressing medical marginalization in informatics according to vectors of power such as race and ethnicity, gender identity and modality, sexuality, disability, housing status, citizenship status, and criminalization status.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We have emphasized collaboration with user and patient groups to define priorities, ensure accessibility and localization, and consider risks in development and utilization of digital health tools. Additionally, we encourage consideration of potential pitfalls in adopting these diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI)-related strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":40027,"journal":{"name":"Yearbook of medical informatics","volume":"31 1","pages":"20-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/29/cf/10-1055-s-0042-1742512.PMC9719765.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digital Health Equity: Addressing Power, Usability, and Trust to Strengthen Health Systems.\",\"authors\":\"Han Koehle,&nbsp;Clair Kronk,&nbsp;Young Ji Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0042-1742512\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Without specific attention to health equity considerations in design, implementation, and evaluation, the rapid expansion of digital health approaches threatens to exacerbate rather than ameliorate existing health disparities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We explored known factors that increase digital health inequity to contextualize the need for equity-centered informatics. This work used a narrative review method to summarize issues about inequities in digital health and to discuss future directions for researchers and clinicians. We searched literature using a combination of relevant keywords (e.g., \\\"digital health\\\", \\\"health equity\\\", etc.) using PubMed and Google Scholar.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We have highlighted strategies for addressing medical marginalization in informatics according to vectors of power such as race and ethnicity, gender identity and modality, sexuality, disability, housing status, citizenship status, and criminalization status.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We have emphasized collaboration with user and patient groups to define priorities, ensure accessibility and localization, and consider risks in development and utilization of digital health tools. Additionally, we encourage consideration of potential pitfalls in adopting these diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI)-related strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":40027,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Yearbook of medical informatics\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"20-32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/29/cf/10-1055-s-0042-1742512.PMC9719765.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Yearbook of medical informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1742512\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yearbook of medical informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1742512","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:如果在设计、实施和评估中没有特别注意卫生公平因素,数字卫生方法的迅速扩展可能会加剧而不是改善现有的卫生差距。方法:我们探讨了增加数字健康不平等的已知因素,以满足以公平为中心的信息学的需求。这项工作使用叙述性审查方法来总结有关数字健康不平等的问题,并讨论研究人员和临床医生的未来方向。我们使用PubMed和Google Scholar结合相关关键词(如“数字健康”、“健康公平”等)检索文献。结果:我们根据权力向量(如种族和民族、性别认同和形态、性、残疾、住房状况、公民身份和刑事定罪状况)强调了解决信息学中医疗边缘化问题的策略。结论:我们强调了与用户和患者群体的合作,以确定优先事项,确保可及性和本地化,并考虑开发和利用数字卫生工具的风险。此外,我们鼓励在采用这些多样性、公平性和包容性(DEI)相关策略时考虑潜在的陷阱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Digital Health Equity: Addressing Power, Usability, and Trust to Strengthen Health Systems.

Background: Without specific attention to health equity considerations in design, implementation, and evaluation, the rapid expansion of digital health approaches threatens to exacerbate rather than ameliorate existing health disparities.

Methods: We explored known factors that increase digital health inequity to contextualize the need for equity-centered informatics. This work used a narrative review method to summarize issues about inequities in digital health and to discuss future directions for researchers and clinicians. We searched literature using a combination of relevant keywords (e.g., "digital health", "health equity", etc.) using PubMed and Google Scholar.

Results: We have highlighted strategies for addressing medical marginalization in informatics according to vectors of power such as race and ethnicity, gender identity and modality, sexuality, disability, housing status, citizenship status, and criminalization status.

Conclusions: We have emphasized collaboration with user and patient groups to define priorities, ensure accessibility and localization, and consider risks in development and utilization of digital health tools. Additionally, we encourage consideration of potential pitfalls in adopting these diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI)-related strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Yearbook of medical informatics
Yearbook of medical informatics Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Published by the International Medical Informatics Association, this annual publication includes the best papers in medical informatics from around the world.
期刊最新文献
Reflections Towards the Future of Medical Informatics. The Impact of Clinical Decision Support on Health Disparities and the Digital Divide. Health Information Exchange: Understanding the Policy Landscape and Future of Data Interoperability. The Need for Green and Responsible Medical Informatics and Digital Health: Looking Forward with One Digital Health. Health Equity in Clinical Research Informatics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1