德国养老院居民习惯性和最大步态速度的比较及其对肌肉减少症量化的影响。

Daniel Haigis, Silas Wagner, Gorden Sudeck, Annika Frahsa, Ansgar Thiel, Gerhard W Eschweiler, Andreas M Niess
{"title":"德国养老院居民习惯性和最大步态速度的比较及其对肌肉减少症量化的影响。","authors":"Daniel Haigis,&nbsp;Silas Wagner,&nbsp;Gorden Sudeck,&nbsp;Annika Frahsa,&nbsp;Ansgar Thiel,&nbsp;Gerhard W Eschweiler,&nbsp;Andreas M Niess","doi":"10.22540/JFSF-07-199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Sarcopenia is characterized by loss of muscle strength and muscle mass. The EWGSOP2 specifications include physical functioning determination for quantification of the sarcopenia severity. However, there is a lack in the use of habitual and maximal gait speed and their influence on sarcopenia quantification. We hypothesize differences in sarcopenia quantification using habitual and maximal gait speed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-six residents from five nursing homes were examined. Habitual and maximal gait speed were measured by 4-meter-walking-Test. McNemar-Test and χ<sup>2</sup>-test were used to identify quantification differences. Effect sizes of both gait speeds were calculated with Spearman's rank-correlation-coefficient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant difference was identified for twenty-two residents in physical functioning classification by McNemar-Test (p<.001). χ<sup>2</sup>-Test identified a significant frequency distribution for sarcopenia categories between both gait speeds (χ<sup>2</sup> (df2)=11.215, p=.004; Cramer's V=.412). Significant correlations (p<.05) were only shown for maximal gait speed in variables falls in the last three months (|r<sub>s</sub>|=.326), Barthel-Index (|r<sub>s</sub>|=.415), and SARC-F (|r<sub>s</sub>|=.335).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of habitual and maximal gait speed has a significant impact on sarcopenia quantification in nursing home residents. An adapted standardization in the EWGSOP2 specifications should follow.</p>","PeriodicalId":73754,"journal":{"name":"Journal of frailty, sarcopenia and falls","volume":"7 4","pages":"199-206"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/da/b0/JFSF-7-199.PMC9729759.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Habitual and Maximal Gait Speed and their Impact on Sarcopenia Quantification in German Nursing Home Residents.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Haigis,&nbsp;Silas Wagner,&nbsp;Gorden Sudeck,&nbsp;Annika Frahsa,&nbsp;Ansgar Thiel,&nbsp;Gerhard W Eschweiler,&nbsp;Andreas M Niess\",\"doi\":\"10.22540/JFSF-07-199\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Sarcopenia is characterized by loss of muscle strength and muscle mass. The EWGSOP2 specifications include physical functioning determination for quantification of the sarcopenia severity. However, there is a lack in the use of habitual and maximal gait speed and their influence on sarcopenia quantification. We hypothesize differences in sarcopenia quantification using habitual and maximal gait speed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-six residents from five nursing homes were examined. Habitual and maximal gait speed were measured by 4-meter-walking-Test. McNemar-Test and χ<sup>2</sup>-test were used to identify quantification differences. Effect sizes of both gait speeds were calculated with Spearman's rank-correlation-coefficient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant difference was identified for twenty-two residents in physical functioning classification by McNemar-Test (p<.001). χ<sup>2</sup>-Test identified a significant frequency distribution for sarcopenia categories between both gait speeds (χ<sup>2</sup> (df2)=11.215, p=.004; Cramer's V=.412). Significant correlations (p<.05) were only shown for maximal gait speed in variables falls in the last three months (|r<sub>s</sub>|=.326), Barthel-Index (|r<sub>s</sub>|=.415), and SARC-F (|r<sub>s</sub>|=.335).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of habitual and maximal gait speed has a significant impact on sarcopenia quantification in nursing home residents. An adapted standardization in the EWGSOP2 specifications should follow.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73754,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of frailty, sarcopenia and falls\",\"volume\":\"7 4\",\"pages\":\"199-206\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/da/b0/JFSF-7-199.PMC9729759.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of frailty, sarcopenia and falls\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22540/JFSF-07-199\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of frailty, sarcopenia and falls","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22540/JFSF-07-199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:肌肉减少症的特征是肌肉力量和肌肉质量的损失。EWGSOP2规范包括用于量化肌肉减少严重程度的身体功能测定。然而,缺乏使用习惯和最大步态速度及其对肌肉减少症量化的影响。我们假设使用习惯和最大步态速度量化肌肉减少症的差异。方法:对来自5家养老院的66名老人进行调查。采用4米步行测试法测定习惯步速和最大步速。采用mcnemar检验和χ2检验鉴定定量差异。用Spearman秩相关系数计算两种步态速度的效应量。结果:通过McNemar-Test对22名居民的身体功能分类发现了显著差异(p2-Test发现两种步态速度之间肌肉减少症类别的频率分布显著(χ2 (df2)=11.215, p= 0.004;克莱姆V = .412)。显著相关(ps|=.326), Barthel-Index (|rs|=.415)和SARC-F (|rs|=.335)。结论:习惯步速和最大步速的使用对养老院居民肌肉减少症的量化有显著影响。应该遵循EWGSOP2规范中的相应标准化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of Habitual and Maximal Gait Speed and their Impact on Sarcopenia Quantification in German Nursing Home Residents.

Objectives: Sarcopenia is characterized by loss of muscle strength and muscle mass. The EWGSOP2 specifications include physical functioning determination for quantification of the sarcopenia severity. However, there is a lack in the use of habitual and maximal gait speed and their influence on sarcopenia quantification. We hypothesize differences in sarcopenia quantification using habitual and maximal gait speed.

Methods: Sixty-six residents from five nursing homes were examined. Habitual and maximal gait speed were measured by 4-meter-walking-Test. McNemar-Test and χ2-test were used to identify quantification differences. Effect sizes of both gait speeds were calculated with Spearman's rank-correlation-coefficient.

Results: Significant difference was identified for twenty-two residents in physical functioning classification by McNemar-Test (p<.001). χ2-Test identified a significant frequency distribution for sarcopenia categories between both gait speeds (χ2 (df2)=11.215, p=.004; Cramer's V=.412). Significant correlations (p<.05) were only shown for maximal gait speed in variables falls in the last three months (|rs|=.326), Barthel-Index (|rs|=.415), and SARC-F (|rs|=.335).

Conclusions: The use of habitual and maximal gait speed has a significant impact on sarcopenia quantification in nursing home residents. An adapted standardization in the EWGSOP2 specifications should follow.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
An Economic Cost Analysis of Implementing a Frailty Care Bundle to Reduce Risk of Hospital Associated Decline Among Older Patients. Can EWGSOP2 and SDOC Definitions of Sarcopenia Identify Functional Muscle Quality? Effects of an Oral Nutritional Supplementation and Physical Exercise Intervention on Older Adults at Risk for Sarcopenia. Examining the Cycle of Physical Frailty in Falls Clinic Attendees Through Structural Equation Modeling. Prognostic Impact of Each Item of the SARC-F Questionnaire in Patients Undergoing Major Surgery for Urologic Cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1