咖啡因对交感神经活动的直接影响:为什么咖啡是安全的?一项单中心交叉研究。

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Clinical Autonomic Research Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-20 DOI:10.1007/s10286-023-00967-5
Jennifer M Butler, Christopher M Frampton, Grant Moore, Murray L Barclay, David L Jardine
{"title":"咖啡因对交感神经活动的直接影响:为什么咖啡是安全的?一项单中心交叉研究。","authors":"Jennifer M Butler, Christopher M Frampton, Grant Moore, Murray L Barclay, David L Jardine","doi":"10.1007/s10286-023-00967-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purposes: </strong>Habitual coffee drinking is ubiquitous and generally considered to be safe despite its transient hypertensive effect. Our purpose was to determine the role of the sympathetic nervous system in the hypertensive response.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a single-centre crossover study, medical caregivers were studied after consumption of standard coffee (espresso), water and decaffeinated coffee (decaff) given in random order at least 1 month apart. Plasma caffeine levels, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, total peripheral resistance and muscle sympathetic activity were recorded. Baroreflex activity was assessed using burst incidence and RR interval changes to spontaneous blood pressure fluctuations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 16 subjects (mean [± standard error] age 34.4 ± 2 years; 44% female) were recruited to the study. Three agents were studied in ten subjects, and two agents were studied in six subjects. Over a 120-min period following the consumption of standard coffee, mean (± SE) plasma caffeine levels increased from 2.4 ± 0.8 to 21.0 ± 4 µmol/L and arterial pressure increased to 103 ± 1 mmHg compared to water (101 ± 1 mmHg; p = 0.066) and decaff (100 ± 1 mmHg; p = 0.016). Peripheral resistance in the same period following coffee increased to 120 ± 4% of the baseline level compared to water (107 ± 4; p = 0.01) and decaff (109 ± 4; p = 0.02). Heart rate was lower after both coffee and decaff consumption: 62 ± 1 bpm compared to water (64 bpm; p = 0.01 and p = 0.02, respectively). Cardio-vagal baroreflex activity remained stable after coffee, but sympathetic activity decreased, with burst frequency of 96 ± 3% versus water (106 ± 3%; p = 0.04) and decaff (112 ± 3%; p = 0.001) despite a fall in baroreflex activity from - 2.2 ± 0.1 to - 1.8 ± 0.1 bursts/100 beats/mmHg, compared to water (p = 0.009) and decaff (p = 0.004).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The hypertensive response to coffee is secondary to peripheral vasoconstriction but this is not mediated by increased sympathetic nerve activity. These results may explain why habitual coffee drinking is safe.</p>","PeriodicalId":10168,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Autonomic Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10751260/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Immediate effect of caffeine on sympathetic nerve activity: why coffee is safe? A single-centre crossover study.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer M Butler, Christopher M Frampton, Grant Moore, Murray L Barclay, David L Jardine\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10286-023-00967-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purposes: </strong>Habitual coffee drinking is ubiquitous and generally considered to be safe despite its transient hypertensive effect. Our purpose was to determine the role of the sympathetic nervous system in the hypertensive response.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a single-centre crossover study, medical caregivers were studied after consumption of standard coffee (espresso), water and decaffeinated coffee (decaff) given in random order at least 1 month apart. Plasma caffeine levels, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, total peripheral resistance and muscle sympathetic activity were recorded. Baroreflex activity was assessed using burst incidence and RR interval changes to spontaneous blood pressure fluctuations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 16 subjects (mean [± standard error] age 34.4 ± 2 years; 44% female) were recruited to the study. Three agents were studied in ten subjects, and two agents were studied in six subjects. Over a 120-min period following the consumption of standard coffee, mean (± SE) plasma caffeine levels increased from 2.4 ± 0.8 to 21.0 ± 4 µmol/L and arterial pressure increased to 103 ± 1 mmHg compared to water (101 ± 1 mmHg; p = 0.066) and decaff (100 ± 1 mmHg; p = 0.016). Peripheral resistance in the same period following coffee increased to 120 ± 4% of the baseline level compared to water (107 ± 4; p = 0.01) and decaff (109 ± 4; p = 0.02). Heart rate was lower after both coffee and decaff consumption: 62 ± 1 bpm compared to water (64 bpm; p = 0.01 and p = 0.02, respectively). Cardio-vagal baroreflex activity remained stable after coffee, but sympathetic activity decreased, with burst frequency of 96 ± 3% versus water (106 ± 3%; p = 0.04) and decaff (112 ± 3%; p = 0.001) despite a fall in baroreflex activity from - 2.2 ± 0.1 to - 1.8 ± 0.1 bursts/100 beats/mmHg, compared to water (p = 0.009) and decaff (p = 0.004).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The hypertensive response to coffee is secondary to peripheral vasoconstriction but this is not mediated by increased sympathetic nerve activity. These results may explain why habitual coffee drinking is safe.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Autonomic Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10751260/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Autonomic Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10286-023-00967-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Autonomic Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10286-023-00967-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:习惯性喝咖啡的人比比皆是,尽管咖啡有短暂的高血压作用,但一般认为喝咖啡是安全的。我们的目的是确定交感神经系统在高血压反应中的作用:在一项单中心交叉研究中,医疗护理人员在饮用标准咖啡(意式浓缩咖啡)、水和无咖啡因咖啡(低咖啡因咖啡)后接受了研究。研究人员记录了血浆咖啡因水平、平均动脉压、心率、总外周阻力和肌肉交感神经活动。利用自发血压波动的猝发率和RR间期变化评估巴反射活动:研究共招募了 16 名受试者(平均 [± 标准误差] 年龄为 34.4 ± 2 岁;44% 为女性)。10 名受试者服用了三种药物,6 名受试者服用了两种药物。在饮用标准咖啡后的 120 分钟内,与水(101 ± 1 mmHg;p = 0.066)和低咖啡因咖啡(100 ± 1 mmHg;p = 0.016)相比,平均(± 标准误差)血浆咖啡因水平从 2.4 ± 0.8 升至 21.0 ± 4 µmol/L,动脉压升至 103 ± 1 mmHg。与水(107 ± 4;p = 0.01)和低咖啡因(109 ± 4;p = 0.02)相比,喝咖啡后同期的外周阻力增至基线水平的 120 ± 4%。饮用咖啡和低咖啡因咖啡后,心率均有所下降:与水(64 bpm;分别为 p = 0.01 和 p = 0.02)相比,心率为 62 ± 1 bpm。喝咖啡后,心迷走神经的巴反射活动保持稳定,但交感神经的活动有所下降,尽管巴反射活动从- 2.2 ± 0.1下降到- 1.8 ± 0.1次/100次/mmHg,但与水(p = 0.009)和脱咖啡因(p = 0.004)相比,爆发频率为96 ± 3%(与水(106 ± 3%;p = 0.04)和脱咖啡因(112 ± 3%;p = 0.001):结论:对咖啡的高血压反应继发于外周血管收缩,但这并不是由交感神经活动增加引起的。这些结果可以解释为什么习惯性饮用咖啡是安全的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Immediate effect of caffeine on sympathetic nerve activity: why coffee is safe? A single-centre crossover study.

Purposes: Habitual coffee drinking is ubiquitous and generally considered to be safe despite its transient hypertensive effect. Our purpose was to determine the role of the sympathetic nervous system in the hypertensive response.

Methods: In a single-centre crossover study, medical caregivers were studied after consumption of standard coffee (espresso), water and decaffeinated coffee (decaff) given in random order at least 1 month apart. Plasma caffeine levels, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, total peripheral resistance and muscle sympathetic activity were recorded. Baroreflex activity was assessed using burst incidence and RR interval changes to spontaneous blood pressure fluctuations.

Results: A total of 16 subjects (mean [± standard error] age 34.4 ± 2 years; 44% female) were recruited to the study. Three agents were studied in ten subjects, and two agents were studied in six subjects. Over a 120-min period following the consumption of standard coffee, mean (± SE) plasma caffeine levels increased from 2.4 ± 0.8 to 21.0 ± 4 µmol/L and arterial pressure increased to 103 ± 1 mmHg compared to water (101 ± 1 mmHg; p = 0.066) and decaff (100 ± 1 mmHg; p = 0.016). Peripheral resistance in the same period following coffee increased to 120 ± 4% of the baseline level compared to water (107 ± 4; p = 0.01) and decaff (109 ± 4; p = 0.02). Heart rate was lower after both coffee and decaff consumption: 62 ± 1 bpm compared to water (64 bpm; p = 0.01 and p = 0.02, respectively). Cardio-vagal baroreflex activity remained stable after coffee, but sympathetic activity decreased, with burst frequency of 96 ± 3% versus water (106 ± 3%; p = 0.04) and decaff (112 ± 3%; p = 0.001) despite a fall in baroreflex activity from - 2.2 ± 0.1 to - 1.8 ± 0.1 bursts/100 beats/mmHg, compared to water (p = 0.009) and decaff (p = 0.004).

Conclusion: The hypertensive response to coffee is secondary to peripheral vasoconstriction but this is not mediated by increased sympathetic nerve activity. These results may explain why habitual coffee drinking is safe.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Autonomic Research
Clinical Autonomic Research 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
6.90%
发文量
65
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Autonomic Research aims to draw together and disseminate research work from various disciplines and specialties dealing with clinical problems resulting from autonomic dysfunction. Areas to be covered include: cardiovascular system, neurology, diabetes, endocrinology, urology, pain disorders, ophthalmology, gastroenterology, toxicology and clinical pharmacology, skin infectious diseases, renal disease. This journal is an essential source of new information for everyone working in areas involving the autonomic nervous system. A major feature of Clinical Autonomic Research is its speed of publication coupled with the highest refereeing standards.
期刊最新文献
The insular cortex, autonomic asymmetry and cardiovascular control: looking at the right side of stroke. Heart rate variability metrics and myocardial recovery in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Adiposity and cardiac autonomic function in children with a family history of obesity. Atomoxetine on neurogenic orthostatic hypotension: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial Responses to Valsalva's maneuver in spinal cord injury do not broadly relate to vasoconstrictor capacity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1