{"title":"基于递归神经网络的事件相关场下电磁源的局部估计。","authors":"Jamie A O'Reilly, Judy D Zhu, Paul Sowman","doi":"10.1088/1741-2552/acef94","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective</i>. To use a recurrent neural network (RNN) to reconstruct neural activity responsible for generating noninvasively measured electromagnetic signals.<i>Approach</i>. Output weights of an RNN were fixed as the lead field matrix from volumetric source space computed using the boundary element method with co-registered structural magnetic resonance images and magnetoencephalography (MEG). Initially, the network was trained to minimise mean-squared-error loss between its outputs and MEG signals, causing activations in the penultimate layer to converge towards putative neural source activations. Subsequently, L1 regularisation was applied to the final hidden layer, and the model was fine-tuned, causing it to favour more focused activations. Estimated source signals were then obtained from the outputs of the last hidden layer. We developed and validated this approach with simulations before applying it to real MEG data, comparing performance with beamformers, minimum-norm estimate, and mixed-norm estimate source reconstruction methods.<i>Main results</i>. The proposed RNN method had higher output signal-to-noise ratios and comparable correlation and error between estimated and simulated sources. Reconstructed MEG signals were also equal or superior to the other methods regarding their similarity to ground-truth. When applied to MEG data recorded during an auditory roving oddball experiment, source signals estimated with the RNN were generally biophysically plausible and consistent with expectations from the literature.<i>Significance</i>. This work builds on recent developments of RNNs for modelling event-related neural responses by incorporating biophysical constraints from the forward model, thus taking a significant step towards greater biological realism and introducing the possibility of exploring how input manipulations may influence localised neural activity.</p>","PeriodicalId":16753,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neural engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Localized estimation of electromagnetic sources underlying event-related fields using recurrent neural networks.\",\"authors\":\"Jamie A O'Reilly, Judy D Zhu, Paul Sowman\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1741-2552/acef94\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Objective</i>. To use a recurrent neural network (RNN) to reconstruct neural activity responsible for generating noninvasively measured electromagnetic signals.<i>Approach</i>. Output weights of an RNN were fixed as the lead field matrix from volumetric source space computed using the boundary element method with co-registered structural magnetic resonance images and magnetoencephalography (MEG). Initially, the network was trained to minimise mean-squared-error loss between its outputs and MEG signals, causing activations in the penultimate layer to converge towards putative neural source activations. Subsequently, L1 regularisation was applied to the final hidden layer, and the model was fine-tuned, causing it to favour more focused activations. Estimated source signals were then obtained from the outputs of the last hidden layer. We developed and validated this approach with simulations before applying it to real MEG data, comparing performance with beamformers, minimum-norm estimate, and mixed-norm estimate source reconstruction methods.<i>Main results</i>. The proposed RNN method had higher output signal-to-noise ratios and comparable correlation and error between estimated and simulated sources. Reconstructed MEG signals were also equal or superior to the other methods regarding their similarity to ground-truth. When applied to MEG data recorded during an auditory roving oddball experiment, source signals estimated with the RNN were generally biophysically plausible and consistent with expectations from the literature.<i>Significance</i>. This work builds on recent developments of RNNs for modelling event-related neural responses by incorporating biophysical constraints from the forward model, thus taking a significant step towards greater biological realism and introducing the possibility of exploring how input manipulations may influence localised neural activity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neural engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neural engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/acef94\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neural engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/acef94","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Localized estimation of electromagnetic sources underlying event-related fields using recurrent neural networks.
Objective. To use a recurrent neural network (RNN) to reconstruct neural activity responsible for generating noninvasively measured electromagnetic signals.Approach. Output weights of an RNN were fixed as the lead field matrix from volumetric source space computed using the boundary element method with co-registered structural magnetic resonance images and magnetoencephalography (MEG). Initially, the network was trained to minimise mean-squared-error loss between its outputs and MEG signals, causing activations in the penultimate layer to converge towards putative neural source activations. Subsequently, L1 regularisation was applied to the final hidden layer, and the model was fine-tuned, causing it to favour more focused activations. Estimated source signals were then obtained from the outputs of the last hidden layer. We developed and validated this approach with simulations before applying it to real MEG data, comparing performance with beamformers, minimum-norm estimate, and mixed-norm estimate source reconstruction methods.Main results. The proposed RNN method had higher output signal-to-noise ratios and comparable correlation and error between estimated and simulated sources. Reconstructed MEG signals were also equal or superior to the other methods regarding their similarity to ground-truth. When applied to MEG data recorded during an auditory roving oddball experiment, source signals estimated with the RNN were generally biophysically plausible and consistent with expectations from the literature.Significance. This work builds on recent developments of RNNs for modelling event-related neural responses by incorporating biophysical constraints from the forward model, thus taking a significant step towards greater biological realism and introducing the possibility of exploring how input manipulations may influence localised neural activity.
期刊介绍:
The goal of Journal of Neural Engineering (JNE) is to act as a forum for the interdisciplinary field of neural engineering where neuroscientists, neurobiologists and engineers can publish their work in one periodical that bridges the gap between neuroscience and engineering. The journal publishes articles in the field of neural engineering at the molecular, cellular and systems levels.
The scope of the journal encompasses experimental, computational, theoretical, clinical and applied aspects of: Innovative neurotechnology; Brain-machine (computer) interface; Neural interfacing; Bioelectronic medicines; Neuromodulation; Neural prostheses; Neural control; Neuro-rehabilitation; Neurorobotics; Optical neural engineering; Neural circuits: artificial & biological; Neuromorphic engineering; Neural tissue regeneration; Neural signal processing; Theoretical and computational neuroscience; Systems neuroscience; Translational neuroscience; Neuroimaging.