神经性厌食症和躯体形式分离:一个被忽视的以身体为中心的视角。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Journal of Trauma & Dissociation Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1080/15299732.2022.2119631
Paola Longo, Enrica Marzola, Matteo Martini, Laura Amodeo, Giovanni Abbate-Daga
{"title":"神经性厌食症和躯体形式分离:一个被忽视的以身体为中心的视角。","authors":"Paola Longo,&nbsp;Enrica Marzola,&nbsp;Matteo Martini,&nbsp;Laura Amodeo,&nbsp;Giovanni Abbate-Daga","doi":"10.1080/15299732.2022.2119631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dissociation in anorexia nervosa (AN) is common (literature reported 29% of dissociative disorders in eating disorders) and higher in patients with binge-purging AN (BP-AN) than in those with restricter AN (R-AN). However, the distinction between somatoform (SomD) and psychoform dissociation (PsyD) is understudied. We aimed to assess the differences in PsyD and SomD, eating-related, general, and body-related psychopathology, and childhood trauma between subtypes of AN. Then, we attempted to describe a subgroup of patients with AN with marked SomD comparing them to patients without SomD, also controlling the results for PsyD and AN subtypes. Inpatients with AN (n = 111; 109 women and 2 men) completed self-reported questionnaires evaluating dissociation, eating-related, body-related, and general psychopathology, and childhood abuses. Patients with BP-AN reported higher SomD and PsyD and a more severe clinical picture than those with R-AN. The SomD-group (n = 41) showed higher eating concerns, trait-anxiety, body-related variables, and sexual/physical abuse compared to the no-SomD group (n = 70), independently of AN subtype and PsyD symptoms. Results described particular features of patients with AN and SomD. Data, clinically, suggest a careful assessment, for both SomD and PsyD, especially when a history of bodily-impacting trauma is present, potentially fostering dissociation-informed interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":47476,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma & Dissociation","volume":"24 1","pages":"141-156"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anorexia Nervosa and Somatoform Dissociation: A Neglected Body-Centered Perspective.\",\"authors\":\"Paola Longo,&nbsp;Enrica Marzola,&nbsp;Matteo Martini,&nbsp;Laura Amodeo,&nbsp;Giovanni Abbate-Daga\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15299732.2022.2119631\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Dissociation in anorexia nervosa (AN) is common (literature reported 29% of dissociative disorders in eating disorders) and higher in patients with binge-purging AN (BP-AN) than in those with restricter AN (R-AN). However, the distinction between somatoform (SomD) and psychoform dissociation (PsyD) is understudied. We aimed to assess the differences in PsyD and SomD, eating-related, general, and body-related psychopathology, and childhood trauma between subtypes of AN. Then, we attempted to describe a subgroup of patients with AN with marked SomD comparing them to patients without SomD, also controlling the results for PsyD and AN subtypes. Inpatients with AN (n = 111; 109 women and 2 men) completed self-reported questionnaires evaluating dissociation, eating-related, body-related, and general psychopathology, and childhood abuses. Patients with BP-AN reported higher SomD and PsyD and a more severe clinical picture than those with R-AN. The SomD-group (n = 41) showed higher eating concerns, trait-anxiety, body-related variables, and sexual/physical abuse compared to the no-SomD group (n = 70), independently of AN subtype and PsyD symptoms. Results described particular features of patients with AN and SomD. Data, clinically, suggest a careful assessment, for both SomD and PsyD, especially when a history of bodily-impacting trauma is present, potentially fostering dissociation-informed interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47476,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Trauma & Dissociation\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"141-156\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Trauma & Dissociation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15299732.2022.2119631\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Trauma & Dissociation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15299732.2022.2119631","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

神经性厌食症(AN)的解离性是常见的(文献报道29%的进食障碍解离性障碍),并且在暴食清除型AN (BP-AN)患者中比限制性AN (R-AN)患者的解离性更高。然而,躯体形式(SomD)和精神形式分离(PsyD)之间的区别尚未得到充分研究。我们的目的是评估不同AN亚型之间在PsyD和SomD、饮食相关、一般和身体相关的精神病理以及儿童创伤方面的差异。然后,我们试图描述一个带有标记SomD的AN患者亚组,将他们与没有SomD的患者进行比较,并控制PsyD和AN亚型的结果。AN住院患者(n = 111;109名女性和2名男性)完成了自我报告问卷,评估精神分裂、饮食相关、身体相关、一般精神病理和童年虐待。BP-AN患者报告的SomD和PsyD高于R-AN患者,临床表现更严重。与非somd组(n = 70)相比,somd组(n = 41)表现出更高的饮食担忧、特质焦虑、身体相关变量和性虐待/身体虐待,与AN亚型和PsyD症状无关。结果描述了AN和SomD患者的特殊特征。临床数据建议对SomD和PsyD进行仔细评估,特别是当存在影响身体的创伤史时,可能会促进分离知情干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Anorexia Nervosa and Somatoform Dissociation: A Neglected Body-Centered Perspective.

Dissociation in anorexia nervosa (AN) is common (literature reported 29% of dissociative disorders in eating disorders) and higher in patients with binge-purging AN (BP-AN) than in those with restricter AN (R-AN). However, the distinction between somatoform (SomD) and psychoform dissociation (PsyD) is understudied. We aimed to assess the differences in PsyD and SomD, eating-related, general, and body-related psychopathology, and childhood trauma between subtypes of AN. Then, we attempted to describe a subgroup of patients with AN with marked SomD comparing them to patients without SomD, also controlling the results for PsyD and AN subtypes. Inpatients with AN (n = 111; 109 women and 2 men) completed self-reported questionnaires evaluating dissociation, eating-related, body-related, and general psychopathology, and childhood abuses. Patients with BP-AN reported higher SomD and PsyD and a more severe clinical picture than those with R-AN. The SomD-group (n = 41) showed higher eating concerns, trait-anxiety, body-related variables, and sexual/physical abuse compared to the no-SomD group (n = 70), independently of AN subtype and PsyD symptoms. Results described particular features of patients with AN and SomD. Data, clinically, suggest a careful assessment, for both SomD and PsyD, especially when a history of bodily-impacting trauma is present, potentially fostering dissociation-informed interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.10%
发文量
39
期刊最新文献
Treatment in Public Centers for Adult Jewish Women Survivors of Childhood Sexual Abuse in Israel: Abuse Characteristics, Psychiatric Profiles, and One-Year Treatment Outcomes. Echoes of Trauma: Experiential Insights into Secondary Traumatic Stress Among Psychotherapists. Engagement with Psychoeducation Exercises Linked with Coping Skill Use and Treatment Outcomes in a Web-Based Program for Dissociative Individuals. "I Had to Relive All of That Again": Retraumatization, Invalidation, and Institutional Betrayal Among Veterans Filing Military Sexual Trauma-Related Disability Claims. Treating Dissociation in PTSD: A Meta-Analysis of Psychological Intervention Studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1