转移性乳腺癌患者每周紫杉醇加吉西他滨两种方案的比较:现实世界数据的倾向评分匹配分析

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20420986221146411
Chengcheng Gong, Yizhao Xie, Yannan Zhao, Yi Li, Jian Zhang, Leiping Wang, Jun Cao, Zhonghua Tao, Xichun Hu, Biyun Wang
{"title":"转移性乳腺癌患者每周紫杉醇加吉西他滨两种方案的比较:现实世界数据的倾向评分匹配分析","authors":"Chengcheng Gong,&nbsp;Yizhao Xie,&nbsp;Yannan Zhao,&nbsp;Yi Li,&nbsp;Jian Zhang,&nbsp;Leiping Wang,&nbsp;Jun Cao,&nbsp;Zhonghua Tao,&nbsp;Xichun Hu,&nbsp;Biyun Wang","doi":"10.1177/20420986221146411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Weekly gemcitabine + paclitaxel (wGT) administration is widely applied in real-world clinical practice. The 28-day and 21-day regimens of wGT are the most widely accepted regimens. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of wGT administration in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and compared the two regimens.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2)-negative MBC who received wGT between October 2013 and October 2016 were identified using an electronic database. The outcome variables included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety profile. Propensity score matching was performed to minimize potential confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 140 patients were included. The median PFS and OS was 7.8 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 7.0-8.7] months and 22.5 (95% CI = 18.8-26.1) months, respectively. The toxicity of wGT was manageable. Among the patients, 90 (64.3%) received the 21-day regimen and 50 (35.7%) received the 28-day regimen. A higher number of younger patients and patients receiving later-line therapy received the 28-day regimen. There was no significant difference between the two groups in PFS after propensity score matching, though subgroup analysis showed that patients with early relapse benefited more from the 28-day regimen. The ORR was numerically higher in 28-day regimen (37.8% <i>versus</i> 28.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.310). However, the 21-day regimen was better tolerated than the 28-day regimen.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>wGT administration showed efficacy and safety in patients with MBC. The efficacy was comparable between the two regimens after adjustment for confounding factors while the 21-day regimen was better tolerated.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary: </strong><b>21-day regimen of wGT was well tolerated in patients with metastatic breast cancer</b> Weekly gemcitabine + paclitaxel (wGT) administration is widely applied in real-world clinical practice. The 28-day and 21-day regimens of wGT are the most widely accepted regimens. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of wGT administration in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and compared the two regimens. Patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2)-negative MBC who received wGT between October 2013 and October 2016 were identified using an electronic database. The outcome variables included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety profile. Propensity score matching was performed to minimize potential confounders. We found that the efficacy was comparable between the two regimens after adjustment for confounding factors while the 21-day regimen was better tolerated.</p>","PeriodicalId":23012,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a2/19/10.1177_20420986221146411.PMC9793024.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of two regimens of weekly paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer: propensity score-matched analysis of real-world data.\",\"authors\":\"Chengcheng Gong,&nbsp;Yizhao Xie,&nbsp;Yannan Zhao,&nbsp;Yi Li,&nbsp;Jian Zhang,&nbsp;Leiping Wang,&nbsp;Jun Cao,&nbsp;Zhonghua Tao,&nbsp;Xichun Hu,&nbsp;Biyun Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20420986221146411\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Weekly gemcitabine + paclitaxel (wGT) administration is widely applied in real-world clinical practice. The 28-day and 21-day regimens of wGT are the most widely accepted regimens. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of wGT administration in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and compared the two regimens.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2)-negative MBC who received wGT between October 2013 and October 2016 were identified using an electronic database. The outcome variables included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety profile. Propensity score matching was performed to minimize potential confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 140 patients were included. The median PFS and OS was 7.8 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 7.0-8.7] months and 22.5 (95% CI = 18.8-26.1) months, respectively. The toxicity of wGT was manageable. Among the patients, 90 (64.3%) received the 21-day regimen and 50 (35.7%) received the 28-day regimen. A higher number of younger patients and patients receiving later-line therapy received the 28-day regimen. There was no significant difference between the two groups in PFS after propensity score matching, though subgroup analysis showed that patients with early relapse benefited more from the 28-day regimen. The ORR was numerically higher in 28-day regimen (37.8% <i>versus</i> 28.0%, <i>p</i> = 0.310). However, the 21-day regimen was better tolerated than the 28-day regimen.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>wGT administration showed efficacy and safety in patients with MBC. The efficacy was comparable between the two regimens after adjustment for confounding factors while the 21-day regimen was better tolerated.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary: </strong><b>21-day regimen of wGT was well tolerated in patients with metastatic breast cancer</b> Weekly gemcitabine + paclitaxel (wGT) administration is widely applied in real-world clinical practice. The 28-day and 21-day regimens of wGT are the most widely accepted regimens. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of wGT administration in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and compared the two regimens. Patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2)-negative MBC who received wGT between October 2013 and October 2016 were identified using an electronic database. The outcome variables included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety profile. Propensity score matching was performed to minimize potential confounders. We found that the efficacy was comparable between the two regimens after adjustment for confounding factors while the 21-day regimen was better tolerated.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a2/19/10.1177_20420986221146411.PMC9793024.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20420986221146411\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20420986221146411","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:每周给药吉西他滨+紫杉醇(wGT)在现实世界的临床实践中被广泛应用。wGT的28天和21天方案是最广泛接受的方案。我们评估了转移性乳腺癌(MBC)患者使用wGT的有效性和安全性,并比较了两种方案。方法:采用电子数据库对2013年10月至2016年10月期间接受wGT治疗的人表皮生长因子受体2 (HER-2)阴性MBC患者进行鉴定。结果变量包括无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)、客观缓解率(ORR)和安全性。进行倾向评分匹配以尽量减少潜在的混杂因素。结果:共纳入140例患者。中位PFS和OS分别为7.8[95%可信区间(CI) = 7.0-8.7]个月和22.5 (95% CI = 18.8-26.1)个月。wGT的毒性是可控的。其中90例(64.3%)采用21天治疗方案,50例(35.7%)采用28天治疗方案。更多的年轻患者和接受后期治疗的患者接受了28天的治疗方案。在倾向评分匹配后,两组之间的PFS没有显著差异,尽管亚组分析显示早期复发的患者从28天的治疗方案中获益更多。28天方案的ORR数值更高(37.8%比28.0%,p = 0.310)。然而,21天的治疗方案比28天的治疗方案耐受性更好。结论:wGT对MBC患者有效、安全。在调整混杂因素后,两种方案的疗效相当,而21天方案的耐受性更好。简明语言总结:转移性乳腺癌患者对21天wGT方案耐受良好,每周给药吉西他滨+紫杉醇(wGT)广泛应用于现实世界的临床实践。wGT的28天和21天方案是最广泛接受的方案。我们评估了转移性乳腺癌(MBC)患者使用wGT的有效性和安全性,并比较了两种方案。2013年10月至2016年10月期间接受wGT治疗的人表皮生长因子受体2 (HER-2)阴性MBC患者使用电子数据库进行鉴定。结果变量包括无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)、客观缓解率(ORR)和安全性。进行倾向评分匹配以尽量减少潜在的混杂因素。我们发现,在调整混杂因素后,两种方案的疗效相当,而21天方案的耐受性更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of two regimens of weekly paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer: propensity score-matched analysis of real-world data.

Purpose: Weekly gemcitabine + paclitaxel (wGT) administration is widely applied in real-world clinical practice. The 28-day and 21-day regimens of wGT are the most widely accepted regimens. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of wGT administration in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and compared the two regimens.

Methods: Patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2)-negative MBC who received wGT between October 2013 and October 2016 were identified using an electronic database. The outcome variables included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety profile. Propensity score matching was performed to minimize potential confounders.

Results: A total of 140 patients were included. The median PFS and OS was 7.8 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 7.0-8.7] months and 22.5 (95% CI = 18.8-26.1) months, respectively. The toxicity of wGT was manageable. Among the patients, 90 (64.3%) received the 21-day regimen and 50 (35.7%) received the 28-day regimen. A higher number of younger patients and patients receiving later-line therapy received the 28-day regimen. There was no significant difference between the two groups in PFS after propensity score matching, though subgroup analysis showed that patients with early relapse benefited more from the 28-day regimen. The ORR was numerically higher in 28-day regimen (37.8% versus 28.0%, p = 0.310). However, the 21-day regimen was better tolerated than the 28-day regimen.

Conclusion: wGT administration showed efficacy and safety in patients with MBC. The efficacy was comparable between the two regimens after adjustment for confounding factors while the 21-day regimen was better tolerated.

Plain language summary: 21-day regimen of wGT was well tolerated in patients with metastatic breast cancer Weekly gemcitabine + paclitaxel (wGT) administration is widely applied in real-world clinical practice. The 28-day and 21-day regimens of wGT are the most widely accepted regimens. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of wGT administration in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and compared the two regimens. Patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2)-negative MBC who received wGT between October 2013 and October 2016 were identified using an electronic database. The outcome variables included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety profile. Propensity score matching was performed to minimize potential confounders. We found that the efficacy was comparable between the two regimens after adjustment for confounding factors while the 21-day regimen was better tolerated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety
Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety Medicine-Pharmacology (medical)
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
31
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies pertaining to the safe use of drugs in patients. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in drug safety, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area. The editors welcome articles of current interest on research across all areas of drug safety, including therapeutic drug monitoring, pharmacoepidemiology, adverse drug reactions, drug interactions, pharmacokinetics, pharmacovigilance, medication/prescribing errors, risk management, ethics and regulation.
期刊最新文献
Determining the optimum dose of remifentanil in combination with propofol for total intravenous anaesthesia in hysteroscopy under Narcotrend and SPI monitoring. The evolution of the Pharmacovigilance department in the pharmaceutical industry: results of an Italian national survey. Comparison of a single intravenous infusion of alfentanil or sufentanil combined with target-controlled infusion of propofol for daytime hysteroscopy: a randomized clinical trial. Governance of artificial intelligence and machine learning in pharmacovigilance: what works today and what more is needed? Patient-centric decision-making in supplements intake and disclosure in clinical practice: a novel SIDP-12 tool to prevent drug-supplement interaction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1