社会网络干预对精神病患者的有效性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 13.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Clinical Psychology Review Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cpr.2023.102321
L.T.A. Swinkels , M. Hoeve , J.F. ter Harmsel , L.J. Schoonmade , J.J.M. Dekker , A. Popma , T.M. van der Pol
{"title":"社会网络干预对精神病患者的有效性:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"L.T.A. Swinkels ,&nbsp;M. Hoeve ,&nbsp;J.F. ter Harmsel ,&nbsp;L.J. Schoonmade ,&nbsp;J.J.M. Dekker ,&nbsp;A. Popma ,&nbsp;T.M. van der Pol","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2023.102321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Strengthening social networks is an important goal in mental health treatment. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of social network interventions for psychiatric patients. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted comparing these interventions with control groups on social and mental health-related outcomes in psychiatric patients. PubMed, EMBASE.com, PsycInfo, Scopus, and IBSS were searched for studies until December 21, 2022. Three-level random effects models were used to obtain Cohen's <em>d</em> mean estimates on composite outcomes of social network and secondary mental health outcomes. Heterogeneity was examined with potential moderators. Thirty-three studies were included. Small-to-moderate effects of social network interventions were detected on positive social network (<em>d</em> = 0.115, <em>p</em> = 0.022) and support (<em>d</em> = 0.159; <em>p</em> = 0.007), general functioning (<em>d</em> = 0.127, <em>p</em> = 0.046), mental health treatment adherence (<em>d</em> = 0.332, <em>p</em> = 0.003), days substance use (<em>d</em> = 0.097, <em>p</em> = 0.004), and abstinence (<em>d</em> = 0.254, <em>p</em> = 0.004). Estimates of psychiatric functioning were higher in samples with more females. The quality of evidence was moderate-to-low. This evidence suggests that social network interventions can improve positive social networks, general functioning, mental health treatment adherence, and substance use in psychiatric patients receiving usual care.</p><p>PROSPERO ID: CRD42019131959.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":13.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effectiveness of social network interventions for psychiatric patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"L.T.A. Swinkels ,&nbsp;M. Hoeve ,&nbsp;J.F. ter Harmsel ,&nbsp;L.J. Schoonmade ,&nbsp;J.J.M. Dekker ,&nbsp;A. Popma ,&nbsp;T.M. van der Pol\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cpr.2023.102321\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Strengthening social networks is an important goal in mental health treatment. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of social network interventions for psychiatric patients. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted comparing these interventions with control groups on social and mental health-related outcomes in psychiatric patients. PubMed, EMBASE.com, PsycInfo, Scopus, and IBSS were searched for studies until December 21, 2022. Three-level random effects models were used to obtain Cohen's <em>d</em> mean estimates on composite outcomes of social network and secondary mental health outcomes. Heterogeneity was examined with potential moderators. Thirty-three studies were included. Small-to-moderate effects of social network interventions were detected on positive social network (<em>d</em> = 0.115, <em>p</em> = 0.022) and support (<em>d</em> = 0.159; <em>p</em> = 0.007), general functioning (<em>d</em> = 0.127, <em>p</em> = 0.046), mental health treatment adherence (<em>d</em> = 0.332, <em>p</em> = 0.003), days substance use (<em>d</em> = 0.097, <em>p</em> = 0.004), and abstinence (<em>d</em> = 0.254, <em>p</em> = 0.004). Estimates of psychiatric functioning were higher in samples with more females. The quality of evidence was moderate-to-low. This evidence suggests that social network interventions can improve positive social networks, general functioning, mental health treatment adherence, and substance use in psychiatric patients receiving usual care.</p><p>PROSPERO ID: CRD42019131959.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48458,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Psychology Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Psychology Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027273582300079X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027273582300079X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

加强社交网络是心理健康治疗的一个重要目标。本研究旨在确定社会网络干预对精神病患者的有效性。进行了一项系统综述和荟萃分析,将这些干预措施与对照组在精神病患者的社会和心理健康结果方面进行了比较。PubMed、EMBASE.com、PsycInfo、Scopus和IBSS在2022年12月21日之前一直在搜索研究。使用三级随机效应模型来获得Cohen对社会网络和次要心理健康结果的复合结果的d均值估计。用潜在的调节因子检测异质性。包括三十三项研究。社会网络干预对积极的社会网络(d=0.115,p=0.022)和支持(d=0.159;p=0.007)、一般功能(d=0.127,p=0.046)、心理健康治疗依从性(d=0.332,p=0.003)、药物使用天数(d=0.097,p=0.004),和禁欲(d=0.254,p=0.004)。女性较多的样本对精神功能的估计更高。证据的质量从中等到低。这一证据表明,社会网络干预可以改善接受常规护理的精神病患者的积极社会网络、总体功能、心理健康治疗依从性和药物使用。PROSPERO ID:CRD42019131959。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effectiveness of social network interventions for psychiatric patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Strengthening social networks is an important goal in mental health treatment. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of social network interventions for psychiatric patients. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted comparing these interventions with control groups on social and mental health-related outcomes in psychiatric patients. PubMed, EMBASE.com, PsycInfo, Scopus, and IBSS were searched for studies until December 21, 2022. Three-level random effects models were used to obtain Cohen's d mean estimates on composite outcomes of social network and secondary mental health outcomes. Heterogeneity was examined with potential moderators. Thirty-three studies were included. Small-to-moderate effects of social network interventions were detected on positive social network (d = 0.115, p = 0.022) and support (d = 0.159; p = 0.007), general functioning (d = 0.127, p = 0.046), mental health treatment adherence (d = 0.332, p = 0.003), days substance use (d = 0.097, p = 0.004), and abstinence (d = 0.254, p = 0.004). Estimates of psychiatric functioning were higher in samples with more females. The quality of evidence was moderate-to-low. This evidence suggests that social network interventions can improve positive social networks, general functioning, mental health treatment adherence, and substance use in psychiatric patients receiving usual care.

PROSPERO ID: CRD42019131959.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Psychology Review
Clinical Psychology Review PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
23.10
自引率
1.60%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Clinical Psychology Review serves as a platform for substantial reviews addressing pertinent topics in clinical psychology. Encompassing a spectrum of issues, from psychopathology to behavior therapy, cognition to cognitive therapies, behavioral medicine to community mental health, assessment, and child development, the journal seeks cutting-edge papers that significantly contribute to advancing the science and/or practice of clinical psychology. While maintaining a primary focus on topics directly related to clinical psychology, the journal occasionally features reviews on psychophysiology, learning therapy, experimental psychopathology, and social psychology, provided they demonstrate a clear connection to research or practice in clinical psychology. Integrative literature reviews and summaries of innovative ongoing clinical research programs find a place within its pages. However, reports on individual research studies and theoretical treatises or clinical guides lacking an empirical base are deemed inappropriate for publication.
期刊最新文献
Factors related to help-seeking and service utilization for professional mental healthcare among young people: An umbrella review Positive health outcomes of mindfulness-based interventions for cancer patients and survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis Sleep and paranoia: A systematic review and meta-analysis Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder: Systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrating the impact of study quality on prevalence rates Gender nonconformity and common mental health problems: A meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1