机器学习预测急性心力衰竭结节病患者的死亡率

IF 2.6 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Cardiovascular digital health journal Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cvdhj.2022.08.001
Qiying Dai MD , Akil A. Sherif MD , Chengyue Jin MD , Yongbin Chen MD, PhD , Peng Cai MS , Pengyang Li MD
{"title":"机器学习预测急性心力衰竭结节病患者的死亡率","authors":"Qiying Dai MD ,&nbsp;Akil A. Sherif MD ,&nbsp;Chengyue Jin MD ,&nbsp;Yongbin Chen MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Peng Cai MS ,&nbsp;Pengyang Li MD","doi":"10.1016/j.cvdhj.2022.08.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Sarcoidosis with cardiac involvement, although rare, has a worse prognosis than sarcoidosis involving other organ systems.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>We used a large dataset to train machine learning models to predict in-hospital mortality among sarcoidosis patients admitted with heart failure (HF).</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Utilizing the National Inpatient Sample, we identified 4659 patients hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of HF. In this cohort, we identified patients with a secondary diagnosis of sarcoidosis using <em>International Statistical Classification of Disease, Tenth Revision</em> (ICD-10) codes. Patients were separated into a training group and a testing group in a 7:3 ratio. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression was used to select variables to prevent model overfitting or underfitting. For machine learning models, logistic regression, random forest, and XGBoosting were applied in the training group. Parameters in each of the models were tuned using the GridSearchCV function. After training, all models were further validated in the testing group. Models were then evaluated using the area under curve (AUC) score, sensitivity, and specificity.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 2.3% of sarcoidosis patients died in HF admission. Our machine learning model analysis found the RF model to have the highest AUC score and sensitivity. Feature analysis found that comorbid arrhythmias and fluid electrolyte disorders were the strongest factors in predicting in-hospital mortality.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Machine learning methods can be useful in identifying predictors of in-hospital mortality in a given dataset.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72527,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular digital health journal","volume":"3 6","pages":"Pages 297-304"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4f/35/main.PMC9795270.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine learning predicting mortality in sarcoidosis patients admitted for acute heart failure\",\"authors\":\"Qiying Dai MD ,&nbsp;Akil A. Sherif MD ,&nbsp;Chengyue Jin MD ,&nbsp;Yongbin Chen MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Peng Cai MS ,&nbsp;Pengyang Li MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cvdhj.2022.08.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Sarcoidosis with cardiac involvement, although rare, has a worse prognosis than sarcoidosis involving other organ systems.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>We used a large dataset to train machine learning models to predict in-hospital mortality among sarcoidosis patients admitted with heart failure (HF).</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Utilizing the National Inpatient Sample, we identified 4659 patients hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of HF. In this cohort, we identified patients with a secondary diagnosis of sarcoidosis using <em>International Statistical Classification of Disease, Tenth Revision</em> (ICD-10) codes. Patients were separated into a training group and a testing group in a 7:3 ratio. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression was used to select variables to prevent model overfitting or underfitting. For machine learning models, logistic regression, random forest, and XGBoosting were applied in the training group. Parameters in each of the models were tuned using the GridSearchCV function. After training, all models were further validated in the testing group. Models were then evaluated using the area under curve (AUC) score, sensitivity, and specificity.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 2.3% of sarcoidosis patients died in HF admission. Our machine learning model analysis found the RF model to have the highest AUC score and sensitivity. Feature analysis found that comorbid arrhythmias and fluid electrolyte disorders were the strongest factors in predicting in-hospital mortality.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Machine learning methods can be useful in identifying predictors of in-hospital mortality in a given dataset.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72527,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiovascular digital health journal\",\"volume\":\"3 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 297-304\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4f/35/main.PMC9795270.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiovascular digital health journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666693622001505\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular digital health journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666693622001505","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:累及心脏的结节病虽然罕见,但预后比累及其他器官系统的结节病差。目的:利用大型数据集训练机器学习模型来预测结节病合并心力衰竭(HF)患者的住院死亡率。方法利用全国住院患者样本,我们确定了4659例初步诊断为心衰的住院患者。在这个队列中,我们使用国际疾病统计分类第十版(ICD-10)代码确定了继发诊断为结节病的患者。将患者按7:3的比例分为训练组和试验组。最小绝对收缩和选择算子回归用于选择变量,以防止模型过拟合或欠拟合。对于机器学习模型,在训练组中应用了逻辑回归、随机森林和XGBoosting。每个模型中的参数都使用GridSearchCV函数进行了调优。训练结束后,在试验组进一步验证所有模型。然后使用曲线下面积(AUC)评分、敏感性和特异性对模型进行评估。结果HF住院时结节病患者死亡率为2.3%。我们的机器学习模型分析发现,RF模型具有最高的AUC得分和灵敏度。特征分析发现,共病性心律失常和体液电解质紊乱是预测住院死亡率的最重要因素。结论机器学习方法可用于识别给定数据集中住院死亡率的预测因子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Machine learning predicting mortality in sarcoidosis patients admitted for acute heart failure

Background

Sarcoidosis with cardiac involvement, although rare, has a worse prognosis than sarcoidosis involving other organ systems.

Objective

We used a large dataset to train machine learning models to predict in-hospital mortality among sarcoidosis patients admitted with heart failure (HF).

Method

Utilizing the National Inpatient Sample, we identified 4659 patients hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of HF. In this cohort, we identified patients with a secondary diagnosis of sarcoidosis using International Statistical Classification of Disease, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes. Patients were separated into a training group and a testing group in a 7:3 ratio. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression was used to select variables to prevent model overfitting or underfitting. For machine learning models, logistic regression, random forest, and XGBoosting were applied in the training group. Parameters in each of the models were tuned using the GridSearchCV function. After training, all models were further validated in the testing group. Models were then evaluated using the area under curve (AUC) score, sensitivity, and specificity.

Results

A total of 2.3% of sarcoidosis patients died in HF admission. Our machine learning model analysis found the RF model to have the highest AUC score and sensitivity. Feature analysis found that comorbid arrhythmias and fluid electrolyte disorders were the strongest factors in predicting in-hospital mortality.

Conclusion

Machine learning methods can be useful in identifying predictors of in-hospital mortality in a given dataset.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiovascular digital health journal
Cardiovascular digital health journal Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
58 days
期刊最新文献
Determinants of global cardiac implantable electrical device remote monitoring utilization – Results from an international survey Cellular-Enabled Remote Patient Monitoring for Pregnancies Complicated by Hypertension Point-of-care testing preferences 2020–2022: Trends over the years Feasibility of remote monitoring for fatal coronary heart disease using Apple Watch ECGs Artificial intelligence–based screening for cardiomyopathy in an obstetric population: A pilot study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1