急性高强度运动Bout对慢性脑卒中患者外显、策略性运动学习保持的影响。

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-30 DOI:10.1177/15459683231195039
Elizabeth D Thompson, Soumya Bhat, Margaret A French, Susanne Morton, Ryan T Pohlig, Darcy S Reisman
{"title":"急性高强度运动Bout对慢性脑卒中患者外显、策略性运动学习保持的影响。","authors":"Elizabeth D Thompson,&nbsp;Soumya Bhat,&nbsp;Margaret A French,&nbsp;Susanne Morton,&nbsp;Ryan T Pohlig,&nbsp;Darcy S Reisman","doi":"10.1177/15459683231195039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Exercise priming, pairing high intensity exercise with a motor learning task, improves retention of upper extremity tasks in individuals after stroke, but has shown no benefit to locomotor learning. This difference may relate to the type of learning studied. Upper extremity studies used explicit, strategic tasks; locomotor studies used implicit sensorimotor adaptation (split-belt treadmill). Since walking is an important rehabilitation goal, it is crucial to understand under which circumstances exercise priming may improve retention of a newly learned walking pattern.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Determine the impact of exercise priming on explicit, strategic locomotor learning task retention in chronic stroke survivors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Chronic stroke survivors (>6 months) performed 2 treadmill walking sessions. Visual feedback was used to train increased step length. Participants were assigned to control group (no exercise), continuous exercise (5 minutes high intensity), or long-interval exercise (15 minutes high/moderate intervals). After day 1 learning, participants either rested or performed exercise. On day 2, retention of the learned walking pattern was tested.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All groups learned on day 1 (<i>P</i> < .001). The 2 priming groups showed significant changes in blood lactate and heart rate after exercise priming, the resting control group did not (<i>P</i> < .001). On day 2, there was no significant between-group difference in cued or un-cued task retention (<i>P</i> = .963 and .287, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Exercise priming did not affect retention of an explicit locomotor task in chronic stroke survivors. Further work should explore subgroups of individuals for whom priming may have selective clinical benefit to locomotor learning.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03726047.</p>","PeriodicalId":56104,"journal":{"name":"Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair","volume":" ","pages":"628-639"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10529423/pdf/nihms-1921710.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of an Acute High Intensity Exercise Bout on Retention of Explicit, Strategic Locomotor Learning in Individuals With Chronic Stroke.\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth D Thompson,&nbsp;Soumya Bhat,&nbsp;Margaret A French,&nbsp;Susanne Morton,&nbsp;Ryan T Pohlig,&nbsp;Darcy S Reisman\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15459683231195039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Exercise priming, pairing high intensity exercise with a motor learning task, improves retention of upper extremity tasks in individuals after stroke, but has shown no benefit to locomotor learning. This difference may relate to the type of learning studied. Upper extremity studies used explicit, strategic tasks; locomotor studies used implicit sensorimotor adaptation (split-belt treadmill). Since walking is an important rehabilitation goal, it is crucial to understand under which circumstances exercise priming may improve retention of a newly learned walking pattern.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Determine the impact of exercise priming on explicit, strategic locomotor learning task retention in chronic stroke survivors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Chronic stroke survivors (>6 months) performed 2 treadmill walking sessions. Visual feedback was used to train increased step length. Participants were assigned to control group (no exercise), continuous exercise (5 minutes high intensity), or long-interval exercise (15 minutes high/moderate intervals). After day 1 learning, participants either rested or performed exercise. On day 2, retention of the learned walking pattern was tested.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All groups learned on day 1 (<i>P</i> < .001). The 2 priming groups showed significant changes in blood lactate and heart rate after exercise priming, the resting control group did not (<i>P</i> < .001). On day 2, there was no significant between-group difference in cued or un-cued task retention (<i>P</i> = .963 and .287, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Exercise priming did not affect retention of an explicit locomotor task in chronic stroke survivors. Further work should explore subgroups of individuals for whom priming may have selective clinical benefit to locomotor learning.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03726047.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56104,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"628-639\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10529423/pdf/nihms-1921710.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683231195039\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683231195039","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:运动启动,将高强度运动与运动学习任务相结合,可以提高中风后个体上肢任务的保留率,但对运动学习没有任何益处。这种差异可能与所研究的学习类型有关。上肢研究采用了明确的战略性任务;运动研究采用了内隐感觉运动适应(分体式跑步机)。由于步行是一个重要的康复目标,因此了解在何种情况下运动启动可以提高新学习的步行模式的保留率至关重要。目的:确定运动启动对慢性脑卒中幸存者明确的、战略性的运动学习任务保留的影响。方法:慢性脑卒中幸存者(>6 月)进行了2次跑步机步行。视觉反馈用于训练增加的步长。参与者被分配到对照组(不锻炼)、持续锻炼组(5 分钟高强度),或长时间间歇运动(15 分钟高/中等间隔)。第一天学习后,参与者要么休息,要么进行锻炼。在第2天,测试学习的行走模式的保持力。结果:各组在第1天学习(P P P = .963和.287)。结论:运动启动不会影响慢性中风幸存者明确运动任务的保留。进一步的工作应该探索启动可能对运动学习有选择性临床益处的个体亚组。ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03726047。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of an Acute High Intensity Exercise Bout on Retention of Explicit, Strategic Locomotor Learning in Individuals With Chronic Stroke.

Background: Exercise priming, pairing high intensity exercise with a motor learning task, improves retention of upper extremity tasks in individuals after stroke, but has shown no benefit to locomotor learning. This difference may relate to the type of learning studied. Upper extremity studies used explicit, strategic tasks; locomotor studies used implicit sensorimotor adaptation (split-belt treadmill). Since walking is an important rehabilitation goal, it is crucial to understand under which circumstances exercise priming may improve retention of a newly learned walking pattern.

Objective: Determine the impact of exercise priming on explicit, strategic locomotor learning task retention in chronic stroke survivors.

Methods: Chronic stroke survivors (>6 months) performed 2 treadmill walking sessions. Visual feedback was used to train increased step length. Participants were assigned to control group (no exercise), continuous exercise (5 minutes high intensity), or long-interval exercise (15 minutes high/moderate intervals). After day 1 learning, participants either rested or performed exercise. On day 2, retention of the learned walking pattern was tested.

Results: All groups learned on day 1 (P < .001). The 2 priming groups showed significant changes in blood lactate and heart rate after exercise priming, the resting control group did not (P < .001). On day 2, there was no significant between-group difference in cued or un-cued task retention (P = .963 and .287, respectively).

Conclusions: Exercise priming did not affect retention of an explicit locomotor task in chronic stroke survivors. Further work should explore subgroups of individuals for whom priming may have selective clinical benefit to locomotor learning.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03726047.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
52
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurorehabilitation & Neural Repair (NNR) offers innovative and reliable reports relevant to functional recovery from neural injury and long term neurologic care. The journal''s unique focus is evidence-based basic and clinical practice and research. NNR deals with the management and fundamental mechanisms of functional recovery from conditions such as stroke, multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer''s disease, brain and spinal cord injuries, and peripheral nerve injuries.
期刊最新文献
Altered Corticospinal and Intracortical Excitability After Stroke: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis. Hemodynamics of the Frontopolar and Dorsolateral Pre-Frontal Cortex in People with Multiple Sclerosis During Walking, Cognitive Subtraction, and Cognitive-Motor Dual-Task. Comparative Efficacy of Cognitive Training for Post-Stroke Aphasia: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. Comparable outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fractures and for rotator cuff arthropathy in a predominantly asian population. A Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate a Digital Therapeutic to Enhance Gait Function in Individuals With Parkinson's Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1