眼科临床试验的终点。

IF 18.6 1区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY Progress in Retinal and Eye Research Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.preteyeres.2022.101160
Leopold Schmetterer , Hendrik Scholl , Gerhard Garhöfer , Lucas Janeschitz-Kriegl , Federico Corvi , SriniVas R. Sadda , Felipe A. Medeiros
{"title":"眼科临床试验的终点。","authors":"Leopold Schmetterer ,&nbsp;Hendrik Scholl ,&nbsp;Gerhard Garhöfer ,&nbsp;Lucas Janeschitz-Kriegl ,&nbsp;Federico Corvi ,&nbsp;SriniVas R. Sadda ,&nbsp;Felipe A. Medeiros","doi":"10.1016/j.preteyeres.2022.101160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>With the identification of novel targets, the number of interventional clinical trials in ophthalmology has increased. Visual acuity has for a long time been considered the gold standard endpoint for clinical trials, but in the recent years it became evident that other endpoints are required for many indications including geographic atrophy and inherited retinal disease. In glaucoma the currently available drugs were approved based on their IOP lowering capacity. Some recent findings do, however, indicate that at the same level of IOP reduction, not all drugs have the same effect on visual field progression. For neuroprotection trials in glaucoma, novel surrogate endpoints are required, which may either include functional or structural parameters or a combination of both. A number of potential surrogate endpoints for ophthalmology clinical trials have been identified, but their validation is complicated and requires solid scientific evidence. In this article we summarize candidates for clinical endpoints in ophthalmology with a focus on retinal disease and glaucoma. Functional and structural biomarkers, as well as quality of life measures are discussed, and their potential to serve as endpoints in pivotal trials is critically evaluated.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21159,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Retinal and Eye Research","volume":"97 ","pages":"Article 101160"},"PeriodicalIF":18.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350946222001203/pdfft?md5=8e7f3f55817357e608bc5c11daea7ccc&pid=1-s2.0-S1350946222001203-main.pdf","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endpoints for clinical trials in ophthalmology\",\"authors\":\"Leopold Schmetterer ,&nbsp;Hendrik Scholl ,&nbsp;Gerhard Garhöfer ,&nbsp;Lucas Janeschitz-Kriegl ,&nbsp;Federico Corvi ,&nbsp;SriniVas R. Sadda ,&nbsp;Felipe A. Medeiros\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.preteyeres.2022.101160\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>With the identification of novel targets, the number of interventional clinical trials in ophthalmology has increased. Visual acuity has for a long time been considered the gold standard endpoint for clinical trials, but in the recent years it became evident that other endpoints are required for many indications including geographic atrophy and inherited retinal disease. In glaucoma the currently available drugs were approved based on their IOP lowering capacity. Some recent findings do, however, indicate that at the same level of IOP reduction, not all drugs have the same effect on visual field progression. For neuroprotection trials in glaucoma, novel surrogate endpoints are required, which may either include functional or structural parameters or a combination of both. A number of potential surrogate endpoints for ophthalmology clinical trials have been identified, but their validation is complicated and requires solid scientific evidence. In this article we summarize candidates for clinical endpoints in ophthalmology with a focus on retinal disease and glaucoma. Functional and structural biomarkers, as well as quality of life measures are discussed, and their potential to serve as endpoints in pivotal trials is critically evaluated.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Progress in Retinal and Eye Research\",\"volume\":\"97 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101160\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":18.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350946222001203/pdfft?md5=8e7f3f55817357e608bc5c11daea7ccc&pid=1-s2.0-S1350946222001203-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Progress in Retinal and Eye Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350946222001203\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Retinal and Eye Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350946222001203","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

随着新靶点的确定,眼科介入临床试验的数量有所增加。长期以来,视力一直被认为是临床试验的金标准终点,但近年来,很明显,包括地理萎缩和遗传性视网膜疾病在内的许多适应症都需要其他终点。在青光眼方面,目前可用的药物是根据其降低眼压的能力批准的。然而,最近的一些发现确实表明,在相同的眼压降低水平下,并非所有药物对视野进展都有相同的影响。对于青光眼的神经保护试验,需要新的替代终点,其可能包括功能或结构参数,也可能包括两者的组合。眼科临床试验的许多潜在替代终点已经确定,但它们的验证很复杂,需要可靠的科学证据。在这篇文章中,我们总结了眼科临床终点的候选者,重点是视网膜疾病和青光眼。讨论了功能和结构生物标志物以及生活质量指标,并对其作为关键试验终点的潜力进行了批判性评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Endpoints for clinical trials in ophthalmology

With the identification of novel targets, the number of interventional clinical trials in ophthalmology has increased. Visual acuity has for a long time been considered the gold standard endpoint for clinical trials, but in the recent years it became evident that other endpoints are required for many indications including geographic atrophy and inherited retinal disease. In glaucoma the currently available drugs were approved based on their IOP lowering capacity. Some recent findings do, however, indicate that at the same level of IOP reduction, not all drugs have the same effect on visual field progression. For neuroprotection trials in glaucoma, novel surrogate endpoints are required, which may either include functional or structural parameters or a combination of both. A number of potential surrogate endpoints for ophthalmology clinical trials have been identified, but their validation is complicated and requires solid scientific evidence. In this article we summarize candidates for clinical endpoints in ophthalmology with a focus on retinal disease and glaucoma. Functional and structural biomarkers, as well as quality of life measures are discussed, and their potential to serve as endpoints in pivotal trials is critically evaluated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
34.10
自引率
5.10%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: Progress in Retinal and Eye Research is a Reviews-only journal. By invitation, leading experts write on basic and clinical aspects of the eye in a style appealing to molecular biologists, neuroscientists and physiologists, as well as to vision researchers and ophthalmologists. The journal covers all aspects of eye research, including topics pertaining to the retina and pigment epithelial layer, cornea, tears, lacrimal glands, aqueous humour, iris, ciliary body, trabeculum, lens, vitreous humour and diseases such as dry-eye, inflammation, keratoconus, corneal dystrophy, glaucoma and cataract.
期刊最新文献
Cellular component transfer between photoreceptor cells of the retina. Role of epigenetics in corneal health and disease. Editorial Board Dual inheritance patterns: A spectrum of non-syndromic inherited retinal disease phenotypes with varying molecular mechanisms Eye on the horizon: The metabolic landscape of the RPE in aging and disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1