Giovanni Morone, Fioravante Capone, Marco Iosa, Alessandro Cruciani, Matteo Paolucci, Alex Martino Cinnera, Gabriella Musumeci, Nicoletta Brunelli, Carmelina Costa, Stefano Paolucci, Vincenzo Di Lazzaro
{"title":"双经颅直流电刺激是否能增强机器人辅助治疗促进慢性脑卒中上肢康复的疗效?","authors":"Giovanni Morone, Fioravante Capone, Marco Iosa, Alessandro Cruciani, Matteo Paolucci, Alex Martino Cinnera, Gabriella Musumeci, Nicoletta Brunelli, Carmelina Costa, Stefano Paolucci, Vincenzo Di Lazzaro","doi":"10.1177/15459683221138743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess whether dual transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) may enhance the efficacy of exoskeleton robotic training on upper limb motor functions in patients with chronic stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective, bi-center, double-blind, randomized clinical trial study was performed. Patients with moderate-to-severe stroke (according to The National Institute of Health Stroke Scale) were randomly assigned to receive dual or sham tDCS immediately before robotic therapy (10 sessions, 2 weeks). The primary outcome was the Fugl-Meyer for Upper Extremity, assessed before, after, and at the 12-week follow-up. Neurophysiological evaluation of corticospinal projections to upper limb muscles was performed by recording motor evoked potentials (MEPs). ClinicalTrials.gov-NCT03026712.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred and sixty individuals were tested for eligibility, of which 80 were enrolled and agreed to participate. Excluding 14 dropouts, 66 patients were randomly assigned into the 2 groups. Results showed that chronic patients were stable before treatment and significantly improved after that. The records within subject improvements were not significantly different between the 2 groups. However, a post-hoc analysis subdividing patients in 2 subgroups based on the presence or absence of MEPs at the baseline showed a significantly higher effect of real tDCS in patients without MEPs when compared to patients with MEPs (<i>F</i> = 4.6, <i>P</i> = .007).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The adjunction of dual tDCS to robotic arm training did not further enhance recovery in the treated sample of patients with chronic stroke. However, a significant improvement in the subgroup of patients with a severe corticospinal dysfunction (as suggested by the absence of MEPs) suggests that they could benefit from such a treatment combination.</p>","PeriodicalId":56104,"journal":{"name":"Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair","volume":"36 12","pages":"800-809"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/22/c4/10.1177_15459683221138743.PMC9720706.pdf","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"May Dual Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Enhance the Efficacy of Robot-Assisted Therapy for Promoting Upper Limb Recovery in Chronic Stroke?\",\"authors\":\"Giovanni Morone, Fioravante Capone, Marco Iosa, Alessandro Cruciani, Matteo Paolucci, Alex Martino Cinnera, Gabriella Musumeci, Nicoletta Brunelli, Carmelina Costa, Stefano Paolucci, Vincenzo Di Lazzaro\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15459683221138743\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess whether dual transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) may enhance the efficacy of exoskeleton robotic training on upper limb motor functions in patients with chronic stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective, bi-center, double-blind, randomized clinical trial study was performed. Patients with moderate-to-severe stroke (according to The National Institute of Health Stroke Scale) were randomly assigned to receive dual or sham tDCS immediately before robotic therapy (10 sessions, 2 weeks). The primary outcome was the Fugl-Meyer for Upper Extremity, assessed before, after, and at the 12-week follow-up. Neurophysiological evaluation of corticospinal projections to upper limb muscles was performed by recording motor evoked potentials (MEPs). ClinicalTrials.gov-NCT03026712.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred and sixty individuals were tested for eligibility, of which 80 were enrolled and agreed to participate. Excluding 14 dropouts, 66 patients were randomly assigned into the 2 groups. Results showed that chronic patients were stable before treatment and significantly improved after that. The records within subject improvements were not significantly different between the 2 groups. However, a post-hoc analysis subdividing patients in 2 subgroups based on the presence or absence of MEPs at the baseline showed a significantly higher effect of real tDCS in patients without MEPs when compared to patients with MEPs (<i>F</i> = 4.6, <i>P</i> = .007).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The adjunction of dual tDCS to robotic arm training did not further enhance recovery in the treated sample of patients with chronic stroke. However, a significant improvement in the subgroup of patients with a severe corticospinal dysfunction (as suggested by the absence of MEPs) suggests that they could benefit from such a treatment combination.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56104,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair\",\"volume\":\"36 12\",\"pages\":\"800-809\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/22/c4/10.1177_15459683221138743.PMC9720706.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683221138743\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15459683221138743","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
摘要
目的:探讨双经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)是否能增强外骨骼机器人训练对慢性脑卒中患者上肢运动功能的影响。方法:采用前瞻性、双中心、双盲、随机临床试验研究。中度至重度卒中患者(根据美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表)被随机分配到机器人治疗前立即接受双重或假tDCS(10次,2周)。主要终点是Fugl-Meyer上肢评分,在12周随访前、后和随访时进行评估。通过记录运动诱发电位(MEPs)对上肢肌肉的皮质脊髓投射进行神经生理学评估。结果:260人接受了资格测试,其中80人注册并同意参与。除14例退组外,66例患者随机分为两组。结果显示,慢性患者治疗前病情稳定,治疗后病情明显好转。两组间受试者改善记录无显著差异。然而,一项基于基线时MEPs存在与否将患者细分为2个亚组的事后分析显示,与有MEPs的患者相比,无MEPs的患者采用真正的tDCS的效果显著更高(F = 4.6, P = 0.007)。结论:双tDCS联合机械臂训练并不能进一步提高慢性脑卒中患者的康复。然而,严重皮质脊髓功能障碍患者亚组的显著改善(由于MEPs的缺失)表明他们可以从这种治疗组合中获益。
May Dual Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Enhance the Efficacy of Robot-Assisted Therapy for Promoting Upper Limb Recovery in Chronic Stroke?
Objective: To assess whether dual transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) may enhance the efficacy of exoskeleton robotic training on upper limb motor functions in patients with chronic stroke.
Methods: A prospective, bi-center, double-blind, randomized clinical trial study was performed. Patients with moderate-to-severe stroke (according to The National Institute of Health Stroke Scale) were randomly assigned to receive dual or sham tDCS immediately before robotic therapy (10 sessions, 2 weeks). The primary outcome was the Fugl-Meyer for Upper Extremity, assessed before, after, and at the 12-week follow-up. Neurophysiological evaluation of corticospinal projections to upper limb muscles was performed by recording motor evoked potentials (MEPs). ClinicalTrials.gov-NCT03026712.
Results: Two hundred and sixty individuals were tested for eligibility, of which 80 were enrolled and agreed to participate. Excluding 14 dropouts, 66 patients were randomly assigned into the 2 groups. Results showed that chronic patients were stable before treatment and significantly improved after that. The records within subject improvements were not significantly different between the 2 groups. However, a post-hoc analysis subdividing patients in 2 subgroups based on the presence or absence of MEPs at the baseline showed a significantly higher effect of real tDCS in patients without MEPs when compared to patients with MEPs (F = 4.6, P = .007).
Conclusion: The adjunction of dual tDCS to robotic arm training did not further enhance recovery in the treated sample of patients with chronic stroke. However, a significant improvement in the subgroup of patients with a severe corticospinal dysfunction (as suggested by the absence of MEPs) suggests that they could benefit from such a treatment combination.
期刊介绍:
Neurorehabilitation & Neural Repair (NNR) offers innovative and reliable reports relevant to functional recovery from neural injury and long term neurologic care. The journal''s unique focus is evidence-based basic and clinical practice and research. NNR deals with the management and fundamental mechanisms of functional recovery from conditions such as stroke, multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer''s disease, brain and spinal cord injuries, and peripheral nerve injuries.