严重哮喘合理管理的质量指标:西班牙多学科共识

IF 1.1 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Healthcare Quality Research Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jhqr.2023.03.003
A. Crespo-Lessmann , J.A. Marqués-Espi , J. Dominguez-Ortega , L. Perez de Llano , M. Blanco-Aparicio , M. Santiñá , M. Palop-Cervera , F.J. Álvarez , J. Fraj
{"title":"严重哮喘合理管理的质量指标:西班牙多学科共识","authors":"A. Crespo-Lessmann ,&nbsp;J.A. Marqués-Espi ,&nbsp;J. Dominguez-Ortega ,&nbsp;L. Perez de Llano ,&nbsp;M. Blanco-Aparicio ,&nbsp;M. Santiñá ,&nbsp;M. Palop-Cervera ,&nbsp;F.J. Álvarez ,&nbsp;J. Fraj","doi":"10.1016/j.jhqr.2023.03.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>Severe asthma is a complex, heterogeneous condition that can be difficult to control despite currently available treatments. Multidisciplinary severe asthma units (SAU) improve control in these patients and are cost-effective in our setting; however, their implementation and development can represent an organizational challenge. The aim of this study was to validate a set of quality care indicators in severe asthma for SAU in Spain.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The Carabela initiative, sponsored by SEPAR, SEAIC, SECA and SEDISA and implemented by leading specialists, analyzed the care processes followed in 6 pilot centers in Spain to describe the ideal care pathway for severe asthma. This analysis, together with clinical guidelines and SEPAR and SEAIC accreditation criteria for asthma units, were used to draw up a set of 11 quality of care indicators, which were validated by a panel of 60 experts (pulmonologists, allergologists, and health-policy decision-makers) using a modified Delphi method.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>All 11 indicators achieved a high level of consensus after just one Delphi round.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Experts in severe asthma agree on a series of minimum requirements for the future optimization, standardization, and excellence of current SAUs in Spain. This proposal is well grounded on evidence and professional experience, but the validity of these consensus indicators must be evaluated in clinical practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37347,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality indicators in the rational management of severe asthma: A Spanish multidisciplinary consensus\",\"authors\":\"A. Crespo-Lessmann ,&nbsp;J.A. Marqués-Espi ,&nbsp;J. Dominguez-Ortega ,&nbsp;L. Perez de Llano ,&nbsp;M. Blanco-Aparicio ,&nbsp;M. Santiñá ,&nbsp;M. Palop-Cervera ,&nbsp;F.J. Álvarez ,&nbsp;J. Fraj\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhqr.2023.03.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>Severe asthma is a complex, heterogeneous condition that can be difficult to control despite currently available treatments. Multidisciplinary severe asthma units (SAU) improve control in these patients and are cost-effective in our setting; however, their implementation and development can represent an organizational challenge. The aim of this study was to validate a set of quality care indicators in severe asthma for SAU in Spain.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The Carabela initiative, sponsored by SEPAR, SEAIC, SECA and SEDISA and implemented by leading specialists, analyzed the care processes followed in 6 pilot centers in Spain to describe the ideal care pathway for severe asthma. This analysis, together with clinical guidelines and SEPAR and SEAIC accreditation criteria for asthma units, were used to draw up a set of 11 quality of care indicators, which were validated by a panel of 60 experts (pulmonologists, allergologists, and health-policy decision-makers) using a modified Delphi method.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>All 11 indicators achieved a high level of consensus after just one Delphi round.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Experts in severe asthma agree on a series of minimum requirements for the future optimization, standardization, and excellence of current SAUs in Spain. This proposal is well grounded on evidence and professional experience, but the validity of these consensus indicators must be evaluated in clinical practice.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2603647923000180\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Healthcare Quality Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2603647923000180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

严重哮喘是一种复杂的异质性疾病,尽管目前已有治疗方法,但仍难以控制。多学科重症哮喘病房(SAU)改善了对这些患者的控制,在我们的环境中具有成本效益;然而,它们的实现和开发可能会对组织构成挑战。本研究的目的是验证西班牙SAU重症哮喘的一套质量护理指标。方法Carabela计划由SEPAR, SEAIC, SECA和SEDISA发起,由领先的专家实施,分析了西班牙6个试点中心遵循的护理流程,以描述严重哮喘的理想护理途径。该分析与临床指南以及哮喘单位的SEPAR和SEAIC认证标准一起,用于制定一套11个护理质量指标,并由60名专家(肺科医生、过敏症医生和卫生政策决策者)组成的小组使用改进的德尔菲法进行验证。结果经1轮德尔菲分析,11项指标均达到高度一致。结论重度哮喘专家对西班牙当前sau未来优化、标准化和卓越性的一系列最低要求达成一致。这一建议是基于证据和专业经验,但这些共识指标的有效性必须在临床实践中进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quality indicators in the rational management of severe asthma: A Spanish multidisciplinary consensus

Aim

Severe asthma is a complex, heterogeneous condition that can be difficult to control despite currently available treatments. Multidisciplinary severe asthma units (SAU) improve control in these patients and are cost-effective in our setting; however, their implementation and development can represent an organizational challenge. The aim of this study was to validate a set of quality care indicators in severe asthma for SAU in Spain.

Methods

The Carabela initiative, sponsored by SEPAR, SEAIC, SECA and SEDISA and implemented by leading specialists, analyzed the care processes followed in 6 pilot centers in Spain to describe the ideal care pathway for severe asthma. This analysis, together with clinical guidelines and SEPAR and SEAIC accreditation criteria for asthma units, were used to draw up a set of 11 quality of care indicators, which were validated by a panel of 60 experts (pulmonologists, allergologists, and health-policy decision-makers) using a modified Delphi method.

Results

All 11 indicators achieved a high level of consensus after just one Delphi round.

Conclusions

Experts in severe asthma agree on a series of minimum requirements for the future optimization, standardization, and excellence of current SAUs in Spain. This proposal is well grounded on evidence and professional experience, but the validity of these consensus indicators must be evaluated in clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
83
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Revista de Calidad Asistencial (Quality Healthcare) (RCA) is the official Journal of the Spanish Society of Quality Healthcare (Sociedad Española de Calidad Asistencial) (SECA) and is a tool for the dissemination of knowledge and reflection for the quality management of health services in Primary Care, as well as in Hospitals. It publishes articles associated with any aspect of research in the field of public health and health administration, including health education, epidemiology, medical statistics, health information, health economics, quality management, and health policies. The Journal publishes 6 issues, exclusively in electronic format. The Journal publishes, in Spanish, Original works, Special and Review Articles, as well as other sections. Articles are subjected to a rigorous, double blind, review process (peer review)
期刊最新文献
[A practical model to implement the patient participation in tertiary hospitals (ICE model)]. [Integrated social value generated in a specialized hospital for chronic patients]. Determinants of citizens' choice between public and private hospitals. Letter to the Editor on "Loneliness impact on healthcare utilization in primary care: A retrospective study". [Learning from our mistakes: Notification of pediatric events through SiNASP in Galicia].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1