贸易政策不确定性对美日双边贸易平衡的影响

IF 0.9 Q3 ECONOMICS Economic Papers Pub Date : 2021-04-24 DOI:10.1111/1759-3441.12313
Serdar Ongan, Ismet Gocer
{"title":"贸易政策不确定性对美日双边贸易平衡的影响","authors":"Serdar Ongan,&nbsp;Ismet Gocer","doi":"10.1111/1759-3441.12313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study examines the impacts of trade policy uncertainties on bilateral trade balances (henceforth, BTBs) of the United States and Japan. This is achieved by using the newly created Trade Policy Uncertainty (henceforth, TPU) index and by also applying the recently created non-linear ARDL approach. The main empirical findings, in summary, are that changes in the TPU index have significant impacts on both countries’ BTBs. Furthermore, while increases in the TPU index in Japan improve US BTB, decreases worsen it. However, increases and decreases in the US TPU index have no impact on Japan’s BTB with the United States. This may lead to the interpretation that Japan’s exporters–importers or Japan’s trade policy are/is not sensitive to changes in the US TPU index, but they/it are/is sensitive to changes in Japan’s TPU index. Based on this result, we may re-classify (to some extent) Japanese exporters–importers as <i>trade policy uncertainty avoidance people</i>, referring to <i>uncertainty avoidance people</i> by Hofstede (1980), since Japanese are one of the highest uncertainty avoidance people in their socio-cultural-economic structure.</p>","PeriodicalId":45208,"journal":{"name":"Economic Papers","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/1759-3441.12313","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impacts of Trade Policy Uncertainties on Bilateral Trade Balances of the United States and Japan\",\"authors\":\"Serdar Ongan,&nbsp;Ismet Gocer\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1759-3441.12313\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study examines the impacts of trade policy uncertainties on bilateral trade balances (henceforth, BTBs) of the United States and Japan. This is achieved by using the newly created Trade Policy Uncertainty (henceforth, TPU) index and by also applying the recently created non-linear ARDL approach. The main empirical findings, in summary, are that changes in the TPU index have significant impacts on both countries’ BTBs. Furthermore, while increases in the TPU index in Japan improve US BTB, decreases worsen it. However, increases and decreases in the US TPU index have no impact on Japan’s BTB with the United States. This may lead to the interpretation that Japan’s exporters–importers or Japan’s trade policy are/is not sensitive to changes in the US TPU index, but they/it are/is sensitive to changes in Japan’s TPU index. Based on this result, we may re-classify (to some extent) Japanese exporters–importers as <i>trade policy uncertainty avoidance people</i>, referring to <i>uncertainty avoidance people</i> by Hofstede (1980), since Japanese are one of the highest uncertainty avoidance people in their socio-cultural-economic structure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45208,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economic Papers\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/1759-3441.12313\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economic Papers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1759-3441.12313\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Papers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1759-3441.12313","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本研究探讨贸易政策不确定性对美国和日本双边贸易平衡(以下简称BTBs)的影响。这是通过使用新创建的贸易政策不确定性(以下简称TPU)指数和应用最近创建的非线性ARDL方法来实现的。综上所述,主要的实证发现是TPU指数的变化对两国的tbbs都有显著的影响。此外,虽然日本TPU指数的上升改善了美国的BTB,但下降使其恶化。然而,美国TPU指数的涨跌对日本与美国的BTB没有影响。这可能会导致日本的出口商-进口商或日本的贸易政策对美国TPU指数的变化不敏感的解释,但他们/它/对日本的TPU指数的变化很敏感。基于这一结果,我们可以(在一定程度上)将日本的出口商-进口商重新分类为贸易政策不确定性规避人群,参考Hofstede(1980)的不确定性规避人群,因为日本人在其社会文化经济结构中是不确定性规避程度最高的人群之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Impacts of Trade Policy Uncertainties on Bilateral Trade Balances of the United States and Japan

This study examines the impacts of trade policy uncertainties on bilateral trade balances (henceforth, BTBs) of the United States and Japan. This is achieved by using the newly created Trade Policy Uncertainty (henceforth, TPU) index and by also applying the recently created non-linear ARDL approach. The main empirical findings, in summary, are that changes in the TPU index have significant impacts on both countries’ BTBs. Furthermore, while increases in the TPU index in Japan improve US BTB, decreases worsen it. However, increases and decreases in the US TPU index have no impact on Japan’s BTB with the United States. This may lead to the interpretation that Japan’s exporters–importers or Japan’s trade policy are/is not sensitive to changes in the US TPU index, but they/it are/is sensitive to changes in Japan’s TPU index. Based on this result, we may re-classify (to some extent) Japanese exporters–importers as trade policy uncertainty avoidance people, referring to uncertainty avoidance people by Hofstede (1980), since Japanese are one of the highest uncertainty avoidance people in their socio-cultural-economic structure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Economic Papers
Economic Papers ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Economic Papers is one of two journals published by the Economics Society of Australia. The journal features a balance of high quality research in applied economics and economic policy analysis which distinguishes it from other Australian journals. The intended audience is the broad range of economists working in business, government and academic communities within Australia and internationally who are interested in economic issues related to Australia and the Asia-Pacific region. Contributions are sought from economists working in these areas and should be written to be accessible to a wide section of our readership. All contributions are refereed.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information China Slowdown Shocks, the West and Australia* Tax Effort Levels across Non-Special Category Indian States – A Stochastic Tax Frontier Analysis* Can Income Inequality Reduce the Happiness of a Healthy Population?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1