医护人员对现场托儿服务的看法。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Journal of Healthcare Management Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1097/JHM-D-22-00007
Amy Braddock, Elizabeth Malm-Buatsi, Sarah Hicks, Grant Harris, Patricia Alafaireet
{"title":"医护人员对现场托儿服务的看法。","authors":"Amy Braddock,&nbsp;Elizabeth Malm-Buatsi,&nbsp;Sarah Hicks,&nbsp;Grant Harris,&nbsp;Patricia Alafaireet","doi":"10.1097/JHM-D-22-00007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Goal: </strong>Measures taken by healthcare organizations to address COVID-19 highlighted the long-standing lack of childcare infrastructure required to support healthcare workers. This study, designed to provide evidence to support operations at an academic medical center, looked at the influence that in-house and emergency childcare could have on the retention, recruitment, and productivity of healthcare workers. This study also outlined the implications that childcare, or its lack, has for healthcare organizations during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a 35-question electronic employee survey (under institutional review board approval) during pandemic-induced public school closures, which included both quantitative and qualitative (write-in) questions.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>The survey results showed that weekday on-site childcare was very or extremely important to more than half of survey respondents, the majority of whom were staff members (28%) or physicians (25%), followed by administrators (15%), researchers (12%), others (10%), nurses (5%), educators (2%), and residents (1%). Sixty percent of respondents reported that emergency on-site childcare was extremely important (34%) or very important (26%). Almost half (49%) reported that emergency childcare needs have disrupted their work in the past year, including canceling of clinics or surgical cases. Analysis of qualitative comments via a strategy based on coding and categorization showed that, when asked how childcare influences their work choices, employees responded that childcare availability has limited the hours or times they could work, that lack of childcare has prevented career growth, that they left a previous job or will leave their current job because of childcare needs, or that they stayed at a previous job or have remained in their current job longer because of the availability of childcare.</p><p><strong>Practical applications: </strong>Although data from this mixed-methods study support findings in the literature that there is a need for in-house and emergency childcare, the data suggest that current employees at this academic medical center do not currently expect it, likely because such childcare is not generally available at most academic institutions. With increased rates of burnout and healthcare workers leaving the field since COVID-19, offering in-house and emergency childcare provides hospital systems with new opportunities to retain and recruit physicians, nurses, and staff, as well as to improve their well-being and productivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":51633,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Healthcare Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Healthcare Workers' Perceptions of On-Site Childcare.\",\"authors\":\"Amy Braddock,&nbsp;Elizabeth Malm-Buatsi,&nbsp;Sarah Hicks,&nbsp;Grant Harris,&nbsp;Patricia Alafaireet\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JHM-D-22-00007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Goal: </strong>Measures taken by healthcare organizations to address COVID-19 highlighted the long-standing lack of childcare infrastructure required to support healthcare workers. This study, designed to provide evidence to support operations at an academic medical center, looked at the influence that in-house and emergency childcare could have on the retention, recruitment, and productivity of healthcare workers. This study also outlined the implications that childcare, or its lack, has for healthcare organizations during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a 35-question electronic employee survey (under institutional review board approval) during pandemic-induced public school closures, which included both quantitative and qualitative (write-in) questions.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>The survey results showed that weekday on-site childcare was very or extremely important to more than half of survey respondents, the majority of whom were staff members (28%) or physicians (25%), followed by administrators (15%), researchers (12%), others (10%), nurses (5%), educators (2%), and residents (1%). Sixty percent of respondents reported that emergency on-site childcare was extremely important (34%) or very important (26%). Almost half (49%) reported that emergency childcare needs have disrupted their work in the past year, including canceling of clinics or surgical cases. Analysis of qualitative comments via a strategy based on coding and categorization showed that, when asked how childcare influences their work choices, employees responded that childcare availability has limited the hours or times they could work, that lack of childcare has prevented career growth, that they left a previous job or will leave their current job because of childcare needs, or that they stayed at a previous job or have remained in their current job longer because of the availability of childcare.</p><p><strong>Practical applications: </strong>Although data from this mixed-methods study support findings in the literature that there is a need for in-house and emergency childcare, the data suggest that current employees at this academic medical center do not currently expect it, likely because such childcare is not generally available at most academic institutions. With increased rates of burnout and healthcare workers leaving the field since COVID-19, offering in-house and emergency childcare provides hospital systems with new opportunities to retain and recruit physicians, nurses, and staff, as well as to improve their well-being and productivity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51633,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Healthcare Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Healthcare Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JHM-D-22-00007\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Healthcare Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JHM-D-22-00007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目标:卫生保健组织为应对COVID-19而采取的措施凸显了长期缺乏支持卫生保健工作者所需的托儿基础设施的问题。本研究旨在为学术医疗中心的运营提供证据,研究了内部和紧急托儿对医护人员的保留、招聘和生产力的影响。本研究还概述了在COVID-19大流行期间和之后,儿童保育或缺乏儿童保育对医疗机构的影响。方法:在大流行导致的公立学校关闭期间,我们进行了一项35个问题的电子员工调查(经机构审查委员会批准),其中包括定量和定性(填写)问题。主要发现:调查结果显示,超过一半的受访者认为工作日的现场托儿非常或极其重要,其中大多数是工作人员(28%)或医生(25%),其次是管理人员(15%)、研究人员(12%)、其他人员(10%)、护士(5%)、教育工作者(2%)和住院医生(1%)。60%的受访者报告说,紧急现场托儿极其重要(34%)或非常重要(26%)。近一半(49%)的人报告说,在过去一年中,紧急托儿需求扰乱了他们的工作,包括取消诊所或手术病例。通过基于编码和分类的策略对定性评论进行的分析表明,当被问及托儿服务如何影响他们的工作选择时,员工回答说,托儿服务的可用性限制了他们的工作时间或时间,缺乏托儿服务阻碍了职业发展,由于托儿服务的需要,他们离开了以前的工作或将离开目前的工作。或者,他们留在以前的工作岗位上,或者在目前的工作岗位上呆得更久,因为有托儿服务。实际应用:虽然这项混合方法研究的数据支持文献中的发现,即需要内部和紧急托儿服务,但数据表明,该学术医疗中心的现有员工目前并不期望有这种服务,可能是因为大多数学术机构通常无法提供这种托儿服务。自2019冠状病毒病以来,随着职业倦怠率和医护人员离职率的上升,提供内部和急诊托儿服务为医院系统提供了留住和招聘医生、护士和工作人员的新机会,并提高了他们的福祉和生产力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Healthcare Workers' Perceptions of On-Site Childcare.

Goal: Measures taken by healthcare organizations to address COVID-19 highlighted the long-standing lack of childcare infrastructure required to support healthcare workers. This study, designed to provide evidence to support operations at an academic medical center, looked at the influence that in-house and emergency childcare could have on the retention, recruitment, and productivity of healthcare workers. This study also outlined the implications that childcare, or its lack, has for healthcare organizations during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: We conducted a 35-question electronic employee survey (under institutional review board approval) during pandemic-induced public school closures, which included both quantitative and qualitative (write-in) questions.

Principal findings: The survey results showed that weekday on-site childcare was very or extremely important to more than half of survey respondents, the majority of whom were staff members (28%) or physicians (25%), followed by administrators (15%), researchers (12%), others (10%), nurses (5%), educators (2%), and residents (1%). Sixty percent of respondents reported that emergency on-site childcare was extremely important (34%) or very important (26%). Almost half (49%) reported that emergency childcare needs have disrupted their work in the past year, including canceling of clinics or surgical cases. Analysis of qualitative comments via a strategy based on coding and categorization showed that, when asked how childcare influences their work choices, employees responded that childcare availability has limited the hours or times they could work, that lack of childcare has prevented career growth, that they left a previous job or will leave their current job because of childcare needs, or that they stayed at a previous job or have remained in their current job longer because of the availability of childcare.

Practical applications: Although data from this mixed-methods study support findings in the literature that there is a need for in-house and emergency childcare, the data suggest that current employees at this academic medical center do not currently expect it, likely because such childcare is not generally available at most academic institutions. With increased rates of burnout and healthcare workers leaving the field since COVID-19, offering in-house and emergency childcare provides hospital systems with new opportunities to retain and recruit physicians, nurses, and staff, as well as to improve their well-being and productivity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Healthcare Management
Journal of Healthcare Management HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: The Journal of Healthcare Management is the official journal of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Six times per year, JHM offers timely healthcare management articles that inform and guide executives, managers, educators, and researchers. JHM also contains regular columns written by experts and practitioners in the field that discuss management-related topics and industry trends. Each issue presents an interview with a leading executive.
期刊最新文献
A New Era for the Patient Safety Imperative. An Exploratory Study of Dynamic Capabilities and Performance Improvement in Hospitals. Associations Between Integration and Patient Experience in Hospital-Based Health Systems: An Exploration of Horizontal and Vertical Forms of Integration. Associations Between Organizational Support, Burnout, and Professional Fulfillment Among US Physicians During the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Burke Kline, DHA, FACHE, CHFP, CEO, Jefferson Community Health & Life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1