SPECT和PET成像中的部分体积效应及其对放射性核素剂量学估计的影响。

H Marquis, K P Willowson, D L Bailey
{"title":"SPECT和PET成像中的部分体积效应及其对放射性核素剂量学估计的影响。","authors":"H Marquis,&nbsp;K P Willowson,&nbsp;D L Bailey","doi":"10.22038/AOJNMB.2022.63827.1448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The spatial resolution of emission tomographic imaging systems can lead to a significant underestimation in the apparent radioactivity concentration in objects of size comparable to the resolution volume of the system. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of the partial volume effect (PVE) on clinical imaging in PET and SPECT with current state-of-the-art instrumentation and the implications that this has for radionuclide dosimetry estimates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the IEC Image Quality Phantom we have measured the underestimation in observed uptake in objects of various sizes for both PET and SPECT imaging conditions. Both single pixel measures (i.e., SUV<sub>max</sub>) and region of interest mean values were examined over a range of object sizes. We have further examined the impact of the PVE on dosimetry estimates in OLINDA in <sup>177</sup>Lu SPECT imaging based on a subject with multiple somatostatin receptor positive paragangliomas in the head and neck.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In PET, single pixel estimates of uptake are affected for objects less than approximately 18 mm in minor axis with existing systems. In SPECT imaging with medium energy collimators (e.g., for <sup>177</sup>Lu imaging), however, the underestimates are far greater, where single pixel estimates in objects less than 2-3×the resolution volume are significantly impacted. In SPECT, region of interest mean values are underestimated in objects less than 10 cm in diameter. In the clinical case example, the dosimetry measured with SPECT ranged from more than 60% underestimate in the largest lesion (28×22 mm in maximal cross-section; 10.2 cc volume) to >99% underestimate in the smallest lesion (4×5 mm; 0.06 cc).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The partial volume effect remains a significant factor when estimating radionuclide uptake in vivo, especially in small volumes. Accurate estimates of absorbed dose from radionuclide therapy will be particularly challenging until robust solutions to correct for the PVE are found.</p>","PeriodicalId":8503,"journal":{"name":"Asia Oceania Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9803618/pdf/","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Partial volume effect in SPECT & PET imaging and impact on radionuclide dosimetry estimates.\",\"authors\":\"H Marquis,&nbsp;K P Willowson,&nbsp;D L Bailey\",\"doi\":\"10.22038/AOJNMB.2022.63827.1448\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The spatial resolution of emission tomographic imaging systems can lead to a significant underestimation in the apparent radioactivity concentration in objects of size comparable to the resolution volume of the system. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of the partial volume effect (PVE) on clinical imaging in PET and SPECT with current state-of-the-art instrumentation and the implications that this has for radionuclide dosimetry estimates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the IEC Image Quality Phantom we have measured the underestimation in observed uptake in objects of various sizes for both PET and SPECT imaging conditions. Both single pixel measures (i.e., SUV<sub>max</sub>) and region of interest mean values were examined over a range of object sizes. We have further examined the impact of the PVE on dosimetry estimates in OLINDA in <sup>177</sup>Lu SPECT imaging based on a subject with multiple somatostatin receptor positive paragangliomas in the head and neck.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In PET, single pixel estimates of uptake are affected for objects less than approximately 18 mm in minor axis with existing systems. In SPECT imaging with medium energy collimators (e.g., for <sup>177</sup>Lu imaging), however, the underestimates are far greater, where single pixel estimates in objects less than 2-3×the resolution volume are significantly impacted. In SPECT, region of interest mean values are underestimated in objects less than 10 cm in diameter. In the clinical case example, the dosimetry measured with SPECT ranged from more than 60% underestimate in the largest lesion (28×22 mm in maximal cross-section; 10.2 cc volume) to >99% underestimate in the smallest lesion (4×5 mm; 0.06 cc).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The partial volume effect remains a significant factor when estimating radionuclide uptake in vivo, especially in small volumes. Accurate estimates of absorbed dose from radionuclide therapy will be particularly challenging until robust solutions to correct for the PVE are found.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia Oceania Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Biology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9803618/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia Oceania Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22038/AOJNMB.2022.63827.1448\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Oceania Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/AOJNMB.2022.63827.1448","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

目的:发射层析成像系统的空间分辨率可能导致与系统分辨率体积相当的物体的表观放射性浓度显著低估。本研究的目的是研究部分体积效应(PVE)对PET和SPECT临床成像的影响,以及这对放射性核素剂量学估计的影响。方法:使用IEC图像质量模型,我们测量了在PET和SPECT成像条件下观察到的不同尺寸物体摄取的低估。单像素测量(即,SUVmax)和感兴趣的区域平均值都在对象大小的范围内进行了检查。我们进一步研究了PVE对OLINDA剂量学估计的影响,该影响基于头部和颈部多个生长抑素受体阳性副神经节瘤的受试者的177Lu SPECT成像。结果:在PET中,现有系统对小轴小于约18 mm的物体的单像素摄取估计受到影响。然而,在使用中能量准直器的SPECT成像中(例如,对于177Lu成像),低估要大得多,其中小于2-3×the分辨率体积的物体的单像素估计受到显著影响。在SPECT中,对于直径小于10cm的物体,感兴趣区域均值被低估。在临床病例中,SPECT测量的剂量范围从最大病变的60%以上低估(最大横截面28×22 mm;10.2 cc体积)到>99%低估最小病变(4×5 mm;0.06 cc)。结论:部分体积效应仍然是评估体内放射性核素摄取的重要因素,特别是在小体积情况下。在找到校正PVE的可靠方法之前,对放射性核素治疗吸收剂量的准确估计将特别具有挑战性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Partial volume effect in SPECT & PET imaging and impact on radionuclide dosimetry estimates.

Objectives: The spatial resolution of emission tomographic imaging systems can lead to a significant underestimation in the apparent radioactivity concentration in objects of size comparable to the resolution volume of the system. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of the partial volume effect (PVE) on clinical imaging in PET and SPECT with current state-of-the-art instrumentation and the implications that this has for radionuclide dosimetry estimates.

Methods: Using the IEC Image Quality Phantom we have measured the underestimation in observed uptake in objects of various sizes for both PET and SPECT imaging conditions. Both single pixel measures (i.e., SUVmax) and region of interest mean values were examined over a range of object sizes. We have further examined the impact of the PVE on dosimetry estimates in OLINDA in 177Lu SPECT imaging based on a subject with multiple somatostatin receptor positive paragangliomas in the head and neck.

Results: In PET, single pixel estimates of uptake are affected for objects less than approximately 18 mm in minor axis with existing systems. In SPECT imaging with medium energy collimators (e.g., for 177Lu imaging), however, the underestimates are far greater, where single pixel estimates in objects less than 2-3×the resolution volume are significantly impacted. In SPECT, region of interest mean values are underestimated in objects less than 10 cm in diameter. In the clinical case example, the dosimetry measured with SPECT ranged from more than 60% underestimate in the largest lesion (28×22 mm in maximal cross-section; 10.2 cc volume) to >99% underestimate in the smallest lesion (4×5 mm; 0.06 cc).

Conclusion: The partial volume effect remains a significant factor when estimating radionuclide uptake in vivo, especially in small volumes. Accurate estimates of absorbed dose from radionuclide therapy will be particularly challenging until robust solutions to correct for the PVE are found.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asia Oceania Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Biology
Asia Oceania Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Biology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
18F-FDG PET/CT imaging of IgG4-producing MALT lymphoma with multiple site involvement. 99mTc-Sn-colloid SPECT/CT in thoracic splenosis after esophageal cancer surgery. A practical method for assessing quantitative scanner accuracy with long-lived radionuclides: The ARTnet insert. Assessment of awareness and knowledge regarding nuclear medicine and appropriate use of Nuclear medicine modalities, among medical students and faculty members in two academic medical institutes in North India: A Cross sectional Study. Comparison between 18F-FDG PET/CT and diffusion-weighted imaging in detection of invasive ductal breast carcinoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1