老年人进行等热量阻力运动和有氧运动后运动后耗氧量过高。

IF 1.4 4区 教育学 Q3 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-01-13 DOI:10.1080/02701367.2022.2136614
Rui Pilon, Paulo Farinatti, Bruno Oliveira, Felipe Cunha, Eduardo Lattari, Walace Monteiro
{"title":"老年人进行等热量阻力运动和有氧运动后运动后耗氧量过高。","authors":"Rui Pilon, Paulo Farinatti, Bruno Oliveira, Felipe Cunha, Eduardo Lattari, Walace Monteiro","doi":"10.1080/02701367.2022.2136614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> Albeit being a major determinant of exercise-related energy expenditure (EE), there is a lack of research on the excess post-exercise oxygen consumption (EPOC) after different exercise modalities in older adults. This study compared the EPOC after isocaloric bouts of resistance (RE) and aerobic (AE) exercise. <b>Methods:</b> The EE during exercise was determined through telemetric indirect calorimetry in ten physically active participants aged 63 to 82 years (5 women, 73 ± 6 years, 70.5 ± 9.9 kg, 161 ± 8 cm). The target EE in AE corresponded to values achieved during RE, and the EPOC was assessed for 30 min in the supine position. <b>Results:</b> The EE during AE and RE were 126.0 ± 30.7 kcal and 123.9 ± 30.6 kcal, respectively. The time to achieve the target EE was 2.3 times shorter in AE <i>vs</i>. RE. The EPOC magnitude was greater after AE (7.9 ± 2.4 L, 40.1 ± 11.1 kcal) than RE (5.9 ± 1.8 L, 26.9 ± 11.5 kcal). <b>Conclusion:</b> Older adults showed greater EPOC after isocaloric sessions of AE <i>vs</i>. RE. Additionally, AE had better temporal efficiency than RE to elicit a given EE.</p>","PeriodicalId":54491,"journal":{"name":"Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Excess Postexercise Oxygen Consumption Following Isocaloric Bouts of Resistance and Aerobic Exercise in Older Adults.\",\"authors\":\"Rui Pilon, Paulo Farinatti, Bruno Oliveira, Felipe Cunha, Eduardo Lattari, Walace Monteiro\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02701367.2022.2136614\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> Albeit being a major determinant of exercise-related energy expenditure (EE), there is a lack of research on the excess post-exercise oxygen consumption (EPOC) after different exercise modalities in older adults. This study compared the EPOC after isocaloric bouts of resistance (RE) and aerobic (AE) exercise. <b>Methods:</b> The EE during exercise was determined through telemetric indirect calorimetry in ten physically active participants aged 63 to 82 years (5 women, 73 ± 6 years, 70.5 ± 9.9 kg, 161 ± 8 cm). The target EE in AE corresponded to values achieved during RE, and the EPOC was assessed for 30 min in the supine position. <b>Results:</b> The EE during AE and RE were 126.0 ± 30.7 kcal and 123.9 ± 30.6 kcal, respectively. The time to achieve the target EE was 2.3 times shorter in AE <i>vs</i>. RE. The EPOC magnitude was greater after AE (7.9 ± 2.4 L, 40.1 ± 11.1 kcal) than RE (5.9 ± 1.8 L, 26.9 ± 11.5 kcal). <b>Conclusion:</b> Older adults showed greater EPOC after isocaloric sessions of AE <i>vs</i>. RE. Additionally, AE had better temporal efficiency than RE to elicit a given EE.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54491,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2022.2136614\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2022.2136614","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:尽管能量消耗(EE)是运动相关能量消耗的主要决定因素,但目前缺乏对老年人在不同运动方式后运动后超量耗氧量(EPOC)的研究。本研究比较了等热量阻力运动(RE)和有氧运动(AE)后的 EPOC。研究方法通过遥测间接热量计测定了 10 名年龄在 63 至 82 岁之间的运动参与者(5 名女性,73 ± 6 岁,70.5 ± 9.9 千克,161 ± 8 厘米)在运动过程中的 EE。AE中的目标EE与RE中达到的值相对应,并对仰卧位30分钟的EPOC进行了评估。结果:AE 和 RE 期间的 EE 分别为 126.0 ± 30.7 千卡和 123.9 ± 30.6 千卡。AE 与 RE 相比,达到目标 EE 的时间缩短了 2.3 倍。AE(7.9 ± 2.4 升,40.1 ± 11.1 千卡)后的 EPOC 幅值大于 RE(5.9 ± 1.8 升,26.9 ± 11.5 千卡)。结论与 RE 相比,老年人在进行等热量的 AE 运动后表现出更高的 EPOC。此外,AE比RE在时间效率上更能激发特定的EE。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Excess Postexercise Oxygen Consumption Following Isocaloric Bouts of Resistance and Aerobic Exercise in Older Adults.

Purpose: Albeit being a major determinant of exercise-related energy expenditure (EE), there is a lack of research on the excess post-exercise oxygen consumption (EPOC) after different exercise modalities in older adults. This study compared the EPOC after isocaloric bouts of resistance (RE) and aerobic (AE) exercise. Methods: The EE during exercise was determined through telemetric indirect calorimetry in ten physically active participants aged 63 to 82 years (5 women, 73 ± 6 years, 70.5 ± 9.9 kg, 161 ± 8 cm). The target EE in AE corresponded to values achieved during RE, and the EPOC was assessed for 30 min in the supine position. Results: The EE during AE and RE were 126.0 ± 30.7 kcal and 123.9 ± 30.6 kcal, respectively. The time to achieve the target EE was 2.3 times shorter in AE vs. RE. The EPOC magnitude was greater after AE (7.9 ± 2.4 L, 40.1 ± 11.1 kcal) than RE (5.9 ± 1.8 L, 26.9 ± 11.5 kcal). Conclusion: Older adults showed greater EPOC after isocaloric sessions of AE vs. RE. Additionally, AE had better temporal efficiency than RE to elicit a given EE.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
125
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport publishes research in the art and science of human movement that contributes significantly to the knowledge base of the field as new information, reviews, substantiation or contradiction of previous findings, development of theory, or as application of new or improved techniques. The goals of RQES are to provide a scholarly outlet for knowledge that: (a) contributes to the study of human movement, particularly its cross-disciplinary and interdisciplinary nature; (b) impacts theory and practice regarding human movement; (c) stimulates research about human movement; and (d) provides theoretical reviews and tutorials related to the study of human movement. The editorial board, associate editors, and external reviewers assist the editor-in-chief. Qualified reviewers in the appropriate subdisciplines review manuscripts deemed suitable. Authors are usually advised of the decision on their papers within 75–90 days.
期刊最新文献
Genotypic Variations Associated with Changes in Body Mass in Response to Endurance Training. "Who's Got Talent?" Change of Direction, Anthropometric Characteristics and Maturity Offset Differences Between Elite and Sub-Elite Young Soccer Player. Types of Social Support Predicting Physical Activity and Quality of Life in Group Exercise Programs for Adults Living with Cancer. Social Network Negativity and Physical Activity: New Longitudinal Evidence for Young and Older Adults 2015-2018. Relationship Between Training Load, Neuromuscular Fatigue, and Daily Well-Being in Elite Young Wrestlers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1