先了解上下文再看图——注意引导对认知线性图处理的影响?

IF 3.4 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Trends in Neuroscience and Education Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.tine.2022.100191

Pirchia-Tamar Waxman , Ronit Ram-Tsur , Michal Zion

{"title":"先了解上下文再看图——注意引导对认知线性图处理的影响?","authors":"Pirchia-Tamar Waxman , Ronit Ram-Tsur , Michal Zion","doi":"10.1016/j.tine.2022.100191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Many studies have investigated the effect of signaling on graph processing, but not the effect of a question's timing as attentional guidance (AG). We investigated how the AG, task level, and visual load affect graph processing, among university students.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>We developed a graph processing task. The AG process created by displaying the question before the graph was displayed. We used behavioral measures and observation duration of eye movements to evaluate graph processing.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>AG has more significant impact on graph processing than the cognitive load of the graph. This means that understanding the context before looking at the graph is important to graph processing. In addition, AG influencing was seen mainly in process duration, rather than on decision-making accuracy.</p></div><div><h3>Originality</h3><p>The results have important implications both for teachers and students how to develop interpretations of visual information into</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>These results are discussed broadly in the article.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46228,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Neuroscience and Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"First understand the context and then look at the graph - the effect of attentional guidance on cognitive linear graph processing?\",\"authors\":\"Pirchia-Tamar Waxman , Ronit Ram-Tsur , Michal Zion\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tine.2022.100191\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Many studies have investigated the effect of signaling on graph processing, but not the effect of a question's timing as attentional guidance (AG). We investigated how the AG, task level, and visual load affect graph processing, among university students.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>We developed a graph processing task. The AG process created by displaying the question before the graph was displayed. We used behavioral measures and observation duration of eye movements to evaluate graph processing.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>AG has more significant impact on graph processing than the cognitive load of the graph. This means that understanding the context before looking at the graph is important to graph processing. In addition, AG influencing was seen mainly in process duration, rather than on decision-making accuracy.</p></div><div><h3>Originality</h3><p>The results have important implications both for teachers and students how to develop interpretations of visual information into</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>These results are discussed broadly in the article.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trends in Neuroscience and Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trends in Neuroscience and Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211949322000199\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Neuroscience and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211949322000199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

目的许多研究研究了信号对图形处理的影响，但没有研究问题时机作为注意引导(AG)的影响。本研究调查了大学生的智力水平、任务水平和视觉负荷对图形处理的影响。我们开发了一个图形处理任务。通过在显示图形之前显示问题而创建的AG过程。我们使用行为测量和眼动观察时间来评估图处理。发现sag对图处理的影响比图认知负荷的影响更显著。这意味着在查看图形之前理解上下文对图形处理非常重要。此外，AG的影响主要体现在过程持续时间上，而不是决策准确性上。这些结果对教师和学生如何发展对视觉信息的解释具有重要意义。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

First understand the context and then look at the graph - the effect of attentional guidance on cognitive linear graph processing?

Purpose

Many studies have investigated the effect of signaling on graph processing, but not the effect of a question's timing as attentional guidance (AG). We investigated how the AG, task level, and visual load affect graph processing, among university students.

Design

We developed a graph processing task. The AG process created by displaying the question before the graph was displayed. We used behavioral measures and observation duration of eye movements to evaluate graph processing.

Findings

AG has more significant impact on graph processing than the cognitive load of the graph. This means that understanding the context before looking at the graph is important to graph processing. In addition, AG influencing was seen mainly in process duration, rather than on decision-making accuracy.