利用指甲剪和尿样预防口腔健康的社区氟化物暴露:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Caries Research Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-06 DOI:10.1159/000533721
Fatemeh Eskandari, Elizabeth Adjoa Kumah, Liane Azevedo, John Stephenson, Sherley John, Fatemeh Vida Zohoori
{"title":"利用指甲剪和尿样预防口腔健康的社区氟化物暴露:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Fatemeh Eskandari, Elizabeth Adjoa Kumah, Liane Azevedo, John Stephenson, Sherley John, Fatemeh Vida Zohoori","doi":"10.1159/000533721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Due to practical difficulties in quantifying fluoride exposure in populations, practical and accurate biomarkers can play a major role in the surveillance of fluoride. Among different fluoride biomarkers, spot urine and nail clippings have gained more attention due to their ease of acquisition. However, there is no robust consensus about the accuracy of these biomarkers for the estimation of fluoride exposure. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to synthesise evidence on the association between fluoride exposure and the fluoride concentration of spot urine and nail clippings. This review was conducted and reported using the PRISMA Statement. Nine databases (Medline, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Sage Journals Online, Campbell Collaboration, Cochrane Collaboration, and Embase); search engines (Google and Google Scholar); and grey literature were searched up to September 2022. All screening, data extraction, and quality assessments were conducted in duplicate. All experimental and observational research studies that reported the correlation between fluoride exposure and fluoride concentrations of spot urine and/or nail clippings were included. The Mixed-Methods Appraisal tool was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. A random effect meta-analysis was carried out to determine the relationship between fluoride exposure and fluoride concentration of biomarkers (i.e., spot urine and nail clippings). Forty-four studies met the inclusion criteria. A total of 694,578 participants were included in this review. Twenty-five studies were included in the meta-analysis. The primary meta-analysis showed a moderate correlation of 0.674 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.623-0.725, n = 25) between fluoride intake and fluoride concentration of spot urine and a strong correlation of 0.938 (95% CI: 0.520-1.355, n = 11) between fluoride intake and the fluoride concentration of nail clippings in all age groups. The findings of secondary meta-analyses showed a strong positive correlation between fluoride intake and fluoride/creatinine ratio of spot urine in children (0.929; 95% CI: 0.502-0.991; n = 2). In conclusion, spot urine and nail clippings have the potential to be employed as non-invasively obtained biomarkers in populations. However, due to the scarcity of high quality, relevant studies, more research is needed to establish the validity of these biomarkers.</p>","PeriodicalId":9620,"journal":{"name":"Caries Research","volume":" ","pages":"197-210"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10641804/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fluoride Exposure in Community Prevention Programmes for Oral Health Using Nail Clippings and Spot Urine Samples: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Fatemeh Eskandari, Elizabeth Adjoa Kumah, Liane Azevedo, John Stephenson, Sherley John, Fatemeh Vida Zohoori\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000533721\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Due to practical difficulties in quantifying fluoride exposure in populations, practical and accurate biomarkers can play a major role in the surveillance of fluoride. Among different fluoride biomarkers, spot urine and nail clippings have gained more attention due to their ease of acquisition. However, there is no robust consensus about the accuracy of these biomarkers for the estimation of fluoride exposure. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to synthesise evidence on the association between fluoride exposure and the fluoride concentration of spot urine and nail clippings. This review was conducted and reported using the PRISMA Statement. Nine databases (Medline, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Sage Journals Online, Campbell Collaboration, Cochrane Collaboration, and Embase); search engines (Google and Google Scholar); and grey literature were searched up to September 2022. All screening, data extraction, and quality assessments were conducted in duplicate. All experimental and observational research studies that reported the correlation between fluoride exposure and fluoride concentrations of spot urine and/or nail clippings were included. The Mixed-Methods Appraisal tool was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. A random effect meta-analysis was carried out to determine the relationship between fluoride exposure and fluoride concentration of biomarkers (i.e., spot urine and nail clippings). Forty-four studies met the inclusion criteria. A total of 694,578 participants were included in this review. Twenty-five studies were included in the meta-analysis. The primary meta-analysis showed a moderate correlation of 0.674 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.623-0.725, n = 25) between fluoride intake and fluoride concentration of spot urine and a strong correlation of 0.938 (95% CI: 0.520-1.355, n = 11) between fluoride intake and the fluoride concentration of nail clippings in all age groups. The findings of secondary meta-analyses showed a strong positive correlation between fluoride intake and fluoride/creatinine ratio of spot urine in children (0.929; 95% CI: 0.502-0.991; n = 2). In conclusion, spot urine and nail clippings have the potential to be employed as non-invasively obtained biomarkers in populations. However, due to the scarcity of high quality, relevant studies, more research is needed to establish the validity of these biomarkers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9620,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Caries Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"197-210\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10641804/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Caries Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000533721\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Caries Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000533721","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于在人群中量化氟化物暴露的实际困难,实用和准确的生物标志物可以在氟化物监测中发挥重要作用。在不同的氟化物生物标志物中,斑点尿和指甲屑因其易于获取而受到更多关注。然而,对于这些生物标记物用于估计氟化物暴露的准确性,还没有强有力的共识。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在综合氟化物暴露与斑尿和指甲剪中氟化物浓度之间关系的证据。该审查是使用PRISMA声明进行和报告的。9个数据库(Medline、CINAHL、Web of Science、Scopus、ScienceDirect、Sage Journals Online、Campbell Collaboration、Cochrane Collaboration和Embase);搜索引擎(谷歌和谷歌Scholar);和灰色文献被搜索到2022年9月。所有筛选、数据提取和质量评估均为一式两份。所有报告氟化物暴露与尿样和/或剪指甲的氟化物浓度之间存在相关性的实验和观察性研究都包括在内。使用混合方法评价工具评估纳入研究的方法学质量。通过随机效应荟萃分析确定氟暴露与生物标志物(即斑尿和指甲剪)氟浓度之间的关系。44项研究符合纳入标准。本综述共纳入694,578名受试者。荟萃分析纳入了25项研究。初步meta分析显示,各年龄组氟摄入量与斑尿氟浓度的相关性为0.674(95%可信区间[CI]: 0.623 ~ 0.725, n = 25),氟摄入量与剪指甲氟浓度的相关性为0.938 (95% CI: 0.52 ~ 1.355, n = 11)。二级meta分析结果显示,氟摄入量与儿童斑尿氟/肌酐比值呈正相关(0.929;95% ci: 0.502-0.991;n = 2)。总之,尿斑和指甲剪报有潜力在人群中作为非侵入性获得的生物标志物。然而,由于缺乏高质量的相关研究,需要更多的研究来确定这些生物标志物的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Fluoride Exposure in Community Prevention Programmes for Oral Health Using Nail Clippings and Spot Urine Samples: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Due to practical difficulties in quantifying fluoride exposure in populations, practical and accurate biomarkers can play a major role in the surveillance of fluoride. Among different fluoride biomarkers, spot urine and nail clippings have gained more attention due to their ease of acquisition. However, there is no robust consensus about the accuracy of these biomarkers for the estimation of fluoride exposure. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to synthesise evidence on the association between fluoride exposure and the fluoride concentration of spot urine and nail clippings. This review was conducted and reported using the PRISMA Statement. Nine databases (Medline, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Sage Journals Online, Campbell Collaboration, Cochrane Collaboration, and Embase); search engines (Google and Google Scholar); and grey literature were searched up to September 2022. All screening, data extraction, and quality assessments were conducted in duplicate. All experimental and observational research studies that reported the correlation between fluoride exposure and fluoride concentrations of spot urine and/or nail clippings were included. The Mixed-Methods Appraisal tool was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. A random effect meta-analysis was carried out to determine the relationship between fluoride exposure and fluoride concentration of biomarkers (i.e., spot urine and nail clippings). Forty-four studies met the inclusion criteria. A total of 694,578 participants were included in this review. Twenty-five studies were included in the meta-analysis. The primary meta-analysis showed a moderate correlation of 0.674 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.623-0.725, n = 25) between fluoride intake and fluoride concentration of spot urine and a strong correlation of 0.938 (95% CI: 0.520-1.355, n = 11) between fluoride intake and the fluoride concentration of nail clippings in all age groups. The findings of secondary meta-analyses showed a strong positive correlation between fluoride intake and fluoride/creatinine ratio of spot urine in children (0.929; 95% CI: 0.502-0.991; n = 2). In conclusion, spot urine and nail clippings have the potential to be employed as non-invasively obtained biomarkers in populations. However, due to the scarcity of high quality, relevant studies, more research is needed to establish the validity of these biomarkers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Caries Research
Caries Research 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
34
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Caries Research'' publishes epidemiological, clinical and laboratory studies in dental caries, erosion and related dental diseases. Some studies build on the considerable advances already made in caries prevention, e.g. through fluoride application. Some aim to improve understanding of the increasingly important problem of dental erosion and the associated tooth wear process. Others monitor the changing pattern of caries in different populations, explore improved methods of diagnosis or evaluate methods of prevention or treatment. The broad coverage of current research has given the journal an international reputation as an indispensable source for both basic scientists and clinicians engaged in understanding, investigating and preventing dental disease.
期刊最新文献
Selective outcome reporting bias in randomized controlled trials on dental caries in children and adolescents: A meta-research study. Is poor self-rated health associated with higher caries experience in adults? The HUNT4 Oral Health Study. Concentration and Stability of Fluoride Chemically Available in Charcoal-Containing Toothpastes. Dentists' Treatment Decisions Concerning Restorations in Adult Patients in North Norway: A Cross-Sectional Tromsø 7 Study. Dietary Carbohydrates Modulate Streptococcus mutans Adherence and Bacterial Proteome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1