Fatemeh Eskandari, Elizabeth Adjoa Kumah, Liane Azevedo, John Stephenson, Sherley John, Fatemeh Vida Zohoori
{"title":"利用指甲剪和尿样预防口腔健康的社区氟化物暴露:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Fatemeh Eskandari, Elizabeth Adjoa Kumah, Liane Azevedo, John Stephenson, Sherley John, Fatemeh Vida Zohoori","doi":"10.1159/000533721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Due to practical difficulties in quantifying fluoride exposure in populations, practical and accurate biomarkers can play a major role in the surveillance of fluoride. Among different fluoride biomarkers, spot urine and nail clippings have gained more attention due to their ease of acquisition. However, there is no robust consensus about the accuracy of these biomarkers for the estimation of fluoride exposure. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to synthesise evidence on the association between fluoride exposure and the fluoride concentration of spot urine and nail clippings. This review was conducted and reported using the PRISMA Statement. Nine databases (Medline, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Sage Journals Online, Campbell Collaboration, Cochrane Collaboration, and Embase); search engines (Google and Google Scholar); and grey literature were searched up to September 2022. All screening, data extraction, and quality assessments were conducted in duplicate. All experimental and observational research studies that reported the correlation between fluoride exposure and fluoride concentrations of spot urine and/or nail clippings were included. The Mixed-Methods Appraisal tool was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. A random effect meta-analysis was carried out to determine the relationship between fluoride exposure and fluoride concentration of biomarkers (i.e., spot urine and nail clippings). Forty-four studies met the inclusion criteria. A total of 694,578 participants were included in this review. Twenty-five studies were included in the meta-analysis. The primary meta-analysis showed a moderate correlation of 0.674 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.623-0.725, n = 25) between fluoride intake and fluoride concentration of spot urine and a strong correlation of 0.938 (95% CI: 0.520-1.355, n = 11) between fluoride intake and the fluoride concentration of nail clippings in all age groups. The findings of secondary meta-analyses showed a strong positive correlation between fluoride intake and fluoride/creatinine ratio of spot urine in children (0.929; 95% CI: 0.502-0.991; n = 2). In conclusion, spot urine and nail clippings have the potential to be employed as non-invasively obtained biomarkers in populations. However, due to the scarcity of high quality, relevant studies, more research is needed to establish the validity of these biomarkers.</p>","PeriodicalId":9620,"journal":{"name":"Caries Research","volume":" ","pages":"197-210"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10641804/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fluoride Exposure in Community Prevention Programmes for Oral Health Using Nail Clippings and Spot Urine Samples: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Fatemeh Eskandari, Elizabeth Adjoa Kumah, Liane Azevedo, John Stephenson, Sherley John, Fatemeh Vida Zohoori\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000533721\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Due to practical difficulties in quantifying fluoride exposure in populations, practical and accurate biomarkers can play a major role in the surveillance of fluoride. Among different fluoride biomarkers, spot urine and nail clippings have gained more attention due to their ease of acquisition. However, there is no robust consensus about the accuracy of these biomarkers for the estimation of fluoride exposure. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to synthesise evidence on the association between fluoride exposure and the fluoride concentration of spot urine and nail clippings. This review was conducted and reported using the PRISMA Statement. Nine databases (Medline, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Sage Journals Online, Campbell Collaboration, Cochrane Collaboration, and Embase); search engines (Google and Google Scholar); and grey literature were searched up to September 2022. All screening, data extraction, and quality assessments were conducted in duplicate. All experimental and observational research studies that reported the correlation between fluoride exposure and fluoride concentrations of spot urine and/or nail clippings were included. The Mixed-Methods Appraisal tool was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. A random effect meta-analysis was carried out to determine the relationship between fluoride exposure and fluoride concentration of biomarkers (i.e., spot urine and nail clippings). Forty-four studies met the inclusion criteria. A total of 694,578 participants were included in this review. Twenty-five studies were included in the meta-analysis. The primary meta-analysis showed a moderate correlation of 0.674 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.623-0.725, n = 25) between fluoride intake and fluoride concentration of spot urine and a strong correlation of 0.938 (95% CI: 0.520-1.355, n = 11) between fluoride intake and the fluoride concentration of nail clippings in all age groups. The findings of secondary meta-analyses showed a strong positive correlation between fluoride intake and fluoride/creatinine ratio of spot urine in children (0.929; 95% CI: 0.502-0.991; n = 2). In conclusion, spot urine and nail clippings have the potential to be employed as non-invasively obtained biomarkers in populations. However, due to the scarcity of high quality, relevant studies, more research is needed to establish the validity of these biomarkers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9620,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Caries Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"197-210\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10641804/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Caries Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000533721\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Caries Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000533721","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
由于在人群中量化氟化物暴露的实际困难,实用和准确的生物标志物可以在氟化物监测中发挥重要作用。在不同的氟化物生物标志物中,斑点尿和指甲屑因其易于获取而受到更多关注。然而,对于这些生物标记物用于估计氟化物暴露的准确性,还没有强有力的共识。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在综合氟化物暴露与斑尿和指甲剪中氟化物浓度之间关系的证据。该审查是使用PRISMA声明进行和报告的。9个数据库(Medline、CINAHL、Web of Science、Scopus、ScienceDirect、Sage Journals Online、Campbell Collaboration、Cochrane Collaboration和Embase);搜索引擎(谷歌和谷歌Scholar);和灰色文献被搜索到2022年9月。所有筛选、数据提取和质量评估均为一式两份。所有报告氟化物暴露与尿样和/或剪指甲的氟化物浓度之间存在相关性的实验和观察性研究都包括在内。使用混合方法评价工具评估纳入研究的方法学质量。通过随机效应荟萃分析确定氟暴露与生物标志物(即斑尿和指甲剪)氟浓度之间的关系。44项研究符合纳入标准。本综述共纳入694,578名受试者。荟萃分析纳入了25项研究。初步meta分析显示,各年龄组氟摄入量与斑尿氟浓度的相关性为0.674(95%可信区间[CI]: 0.623 ~ 0.725, n = 25),氟摄入量与剪指甲氟浓度的相关性为0.938 (95% CI: 0.52 ~ 1.355, n = 11)。二级meta分析结果显示,氟摄入量与儿童斑尿氟/肌酐比值呈正相关(0.929;95% ci: 0.502-0.991;n = 2)。总之,尿斑和指甲剪报有潜力在人群中作为非侵入性获得的生物标志物。然而,由于缺乏高质量的相关研究,需要更多的研究来确定这些生物标志物的有效性。
Fluoride Exposure in Community Prevention Programmes for Oral Health Using Nail Clippings and Spot Urine Samples: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Due to practical difficulties in quantifying fluoride exposure in populations, practical and accurate biomarkers can play a major role in the surveillance of fluoride. Among different fluoride biomarkers, spot urine and nail clippings have gained more attention due to their ease of acquisition. However, there is no robust consensus about the accuracy of these biomarkers for the estimation of fluoride exposure. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to synthesise evidence on the association between fluoride exposure and the fluoride concentration of spot urine and nail clippings. This review was conducted and reported using the PRISMA Statement. Nine databases (Medline, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Sage Journals Online, Campbell Collaboration, Cochrane Collaboration, and Embase); search engines (Google and Google Scholar); and grey literature were searched up to September 2022. All screening, data extraction, and quality assessments were conducted in duplicate. All experimental and observational research studies that reported the correlation between fluoride exposure and fluoride concentrations of spot urine and/or nail clippings were included. The Mixed-Methods Appraisal tool was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. A random effect meta-analysis was carried out to determine the relationship between fluoride exposure and fluoride concentration of biomarkers (i.e., spot urine and nail clippings). Forty-four studies met the inclusion criteria. A total of 694,578 participants were included in this review. Twenty-five studies were included in the meta-analysis. The primary meta-analysis showed a moderate correlation of 0.674 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.623-0.725, n = 25) between fluoride intake and fluoride concentration of spot urine and a strong correlation of 0.938 (95% CI: 0.520-1.355, n = 11) between fluoride intake and the fluoride concentration of nail clippings in all age groups. The findings of secondary meta-analyses showed a strong positive correlation between fluoride intake and fluoride/creatinine ratio of spot urine in children (0.929; 95% CI: 0.502-0.991; n = 2). In conclusion, spot urine and nail clippings have the potential to be employed as non-invasively obtained biomarkers in populations. However, due to the scarcity of high quality, relevant studies, more research is needed to establish the validity of these biomarkers.
期刊介绍:
''Caries Research'' publishes epidemiological, clinical and laboratory studies in dental caries, erosion and related dental diseases. Some studies build on the considerable advances already made in caries prevention, e.g. through fluoride application. Some aim to improve understanding of the increasingly important problem of dental erosion and the associated tooth wear process. Others monitor the changing pattern of caries in different populations, explore improved methods of diagnosis or evaluate methods of prevention or treatment. The broad coverage of current research has given the journal an international reputation as an indispensable source for both basic scientists and clinicians engaged in understanding, investigating and preventing dental disease.