神经丝光与中重度缺血性脑卒中的临床预后和出血转化有关。

IF 2.6 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Central Nervous System Disease Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/11795735221147212
Wanakorn Rattanawong, Tatchaporn Ongphichetmetha, Thiravat Hemachudha, Poosanu Thanapornsangsuth
{"title":"神经丝光与中重度缺血性脑卒中的临床预后和出血转化有关。","authors":"Wanakorn Rattanawong,&nbsp;Tatchaporn Ongphichetmetha,&nbsp;Thiravat Hemachudha,&nbsp;Poosanu Thanapornsangsuth","doi":"10.1177/11795735221147212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ischemic stroke is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. One possible predictor is the use of biomarkers especially neurofilament light chain (NFL).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore whether NFL could predict clinical outcome and hemorrhagic transformation in moderate to severe stroke.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Single center prospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-one moderate to severe ischemic stroke patients were recruited. Blood NFL was obtained from patients at admission (First sample) and 24-96 hours later (Second sample). NFL was analyzed with the ultrasensitive single molecule array (Simoa). Later, we calculated incremental rate NFL (IRN) by changes in NFL per day from baseline. We evaluated National Institute of Health stroke scale (NIHSS), modified Rankins score (mRs), and the presence of hemorrhagic transformation (HT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>IRN was found to be higher in patients with unfavorable outcome (7.12 vs 24.07, <i>P</i> = .04) as well as Second sample (49.06 vs 71.41, <i>P</i> = .011), while NFL First sample was not significant. IRN had a great correlation with mRS (r = .552, <i>P</i> < .001). Univariate logistic regression model showed OR of IRN and Second sample to be 1.081 (95% CI 1.016-1.149, <i>P</i> = .013) and 1.019 (1.002-1.037, <i>P</i> = .03), respectively. Multiple logistic regression model has shown to be significant. In receiver operating analysis, IRN, Second sample, combined IRN with NIHSS and combined Second sample with NIHSS showed AUC (.744, <i>P</i> = .004; 0.713, <i>P</i> = .01; 0.805, <i>P</i> < .001; 0.803, <i>P</i> < .001, respectively). For HT, First sample and Second sample had significant difference with HT (Z = 2.13, <i>P</i> = .033; Z = 2.487, <i>P</i> = .013, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NFL was found to correlate and predict clinical outcome. In addition, it was found to correlate with HT.</p>","PeriodicalId":15218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Central Nervous System Disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f1/59/10.1177_11795735221147212.PMC9827527.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neurofilament light is associated with clinical outcome and hemorrhagic transformation in moderate to severe ischemic stroke.\",\"authors\":\"Wanakorn Rattanawong,&nbsp;Tatchaporn Ongphichetmetha,&nbsp;Thiravat Hemachudha,&nbsp;Poosanu Thanapornsangsuth\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/11795735221147212\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ischemic stroke is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. One possible predictor is the use of biomarkers especially neurofilament light chain (NFL).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore whether NFL could predict clinical outcome and hemorrhagic transformation in moderate to severe stroke.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Single center prospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-one moderate to severe ischemic stroke patients were recruited. Blood NFL was obtained from patients at admission (First sample) and 24-96 hours later (Second sample). NFL was analyzed with the ultrasensitive single molecule array (Simoa). Later, we calculated incremental rate NFL (IRN) by changes in NFL per day from baseline. We evaluated National Institute of Health stroke scale (NIHSS), modified Rankins score (mRs), and the presence of hemorrhagic transformation (HT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>IRN was found to be higher in patients with unfavorable outcome (7.12 vs 24.07, <i>P</i> = .04) as well as Second sample (49.06 vs 71.41, <i>P</i> = .011), while NFL First sample was not significant. IRN had a great correlation with mRS (r = .552, <i>P</i> < .001). Univariate logistic regression model showed OR of IRN and Second sample to be 1.081 (95% CI 1.016-1.149, <i>P</i> = .013) and 1.019 (1.002-1.037, <i>P</i> = .03), respectively. Multiple logistic regression model has shown to be significant. In receiver operating analysis, IRN, Second sample, combined IRN with NIHSS and combined Second sample with NIHSS showed AUC (.744, <i>P</i> = .004; 0.713, <i>P</i> = .01; 0.805, <i>P</i> < .001; 0.803, <i>P</i> < .001, respectively). For HT, First sample and Second sample had significant difference with HT (Z = 2.13, <i>P</i> = .033; Z = 2.487, <i>P</i> = .013, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NFL was found to correlate and predict clinical outcome. In addition, it was found to correlate with HT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Central Nervous System Disease\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f1/59/10.1177_11795735221147212.PMC9827527.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Central Nervous System Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/11795735221147212\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Central Nervous System Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11795735221147212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:缺血性脑卒中是世界范围内发病率和死亡率的主要原因。一个可能的预测指标是生物标志物的使用,尤其是神经丝轻链(NFL)。目的:探讨NFL能否预测中重度脑卒中患者的临床转归和出血转化。设计:单中心前瞻性队列研究。方法:选取51例中重度缺血性脑卒中患者。患者入院时(第一样本)和24-96小时后(第二样本)采集血液NFL。采用超灵敏单分子阵列(Simoa)对NFL进行分析。随后,我们通过从基线开始每天NFL的变化来计算增量率NFL (IRN)。我们评估了美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)、改良Rankins评分(mRs)和出血性转化(HT)的存在。结果:不良结局患者的IRN较高(7.12 vs 24.07, P = 0.04),第二样本的IRN较高(49.06 vs 71.41, P = 0.011),而第一样本的IRN无统计学意义。IRN与mRS有显著相关性(r = .552, P < .001)。单因素logistic回归模型显示,IRN和Second样本的OR分别为1.081 (95% CI 1.016 ~ 1.149, P = 0.013)和1.019 (1.002 ~ 1.037,P = 0.03)。多元逻辑回归模型已显示出显著性。在受试者操作分析中,IRN、第二样本、IRN联合NIHSS和第二样本联合NIHSS显示AUC()。744, p = .004;0.713, p = 0.01;0.805, p < 0.001;0.803, P < 0.001)。对于HT,第一样本和第二样本与HT有显著性差异(Z = 2.13, P = 0.033;Z = 2.487, P = 0.013)。结论:发现NFL与临床预后相关并预测其预后。此外,它被发现与HT相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Neurofilament light is associated with clinical outcome and hemorrhagic transformation in moderate to severe ischemic stroke.

Background: Ischemic stroke is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. One possible predictor is the use of biomarkers especially neurofilament light chain (NFL).

Objectives: To explore whether NFL could predict clinical outcome and hemorrhagic transformation in moderate to severe stroke.

Design: Single center prospective cohort study.

Methods: Fifty-one moderate to severe ischemic stroke patients were recruited. Blood NFL was obtained from patients at admission (First sample) and 24-96 hours later (Second sample). NFL was analyzed with the ultrasensitive single molecule array (Simoa). Later, we calculated incremental rate NFL (IRN) by changes in NFL per day from baseline. We evaluated National Institute of Health stroke scale (NIHSS), modified Rankins score (mRs), and the presence of hemorrhagic transformation (HT).

Results: IRN was found to be higher in patients with unfavorable outcome (7.12 vs 24.07, P = .04) as well as Second sample (49.06 vs 71.41, P = .011), while NFL First sample was not significant. IRN had a great correlation with mRS (r = .552, P < .001). Univariate logistic regression model showed OR of IRN and Second sample to be 1.081 (95% CI 1.016-1.149, P = .013) and 1.019 (1.002-1.037, P = .03), respectively. Multiple logistic regression model has shown to be significant. In receiver operating analysis, IRN, Second sample, combined IRN with NIHSS and combined Second sample with NIHSS showed AUC (.744, P = .004; 0.713, P = .01; 0.805, P < .001; 0.803, P < .001, respectively). For HT, First sample and Second sample had significant difference with HT (Z = 2.13, P = .033; Z = 2.487, P = .013, respectively).

Conclusion: NFL was found to correlate and predict clinical outcome. In addition, it was found to correlate with HT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Five-year efficacy outcomes of ocrelizumab in relapsing multiple sclerosis: A propensity-matched comparison of the OPERA studies with other disease-modifying therapies in real-world lines of treatments. Unlocking the code for stroke treatment and care. Diagnostic value of soluble Interleukin-2 receptor in patients suffering neurosarcoidosis: A systematic review. Dysregulation of tetrahydrobiopterin metabolism in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome by pentose phosphate pathway. Electroencephalography as a tool for assessing delirium in hospitalized patients: A single-center tertiary hospital experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1