新编制的临床护士胜任力量表的心理测量学检验。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Journal of Nursing Research Pub Date : 2022-02-21 DOI:10.1097/jnr.0000000000000472
Chia-Chan Kao, Hsiu-Ling Chao, Yi-Hui Liu, I-Ju Pan, Li-Hui Yang, Wan-I Chen
{"title":"新编制的临床护士胜任力量表的心理测量学检验。","authors":"Chia-Chan Kao,&nbsp;Hsiu-Ling Chao,&nbsp;Yi-Hui Liu,&nbsp;I-Ju Pan,&nbsp;Li-Hui Yang,&nbsp;Wan-I Chen","doi":"10.1097/jnr.0000000000000472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nursing competence is an essential element in ensuring high-quality nursing care and positive patient outcomes. Valid and reliable assessment tools for assessing nurse competence are needed to help nurse supervisors measure whether nurses are performing their job well and to provide a baseline for improving the competences of nurses.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study was designed to develop and psychometrically validate the Competence Scale for Clinical Nurses (CSCN).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The CSCN was developed in three steps: (a) generalize assessment items from nursing competence-related scales and a review of the relevant literature, (b) determine the content validity of the developed scale, and (c) psychometrically test the developed scale. Five hundred nurses were recruited from a medical center in southern Taiwan. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were executed to analyze construct validity and internal consistency reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The scale-content validity index was .87, as determined by five experts. Two thirds (63.29%) of the variance was explained by three factors: basic care skills (nine items), being dedicated to work (five items), and patient-centered and ethical considerations (four items). A second-order confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the data fit the model well. The Cronbach's alpha coefficients for each of the three factors and the total scale were .84-.91.</p><p><strong>Conclusions/implications for practice: </strong>The 18-item CSCN is a feasible and time-efficient tool for assessing competence in clinical nurses. Nursing supervisors may use this tool to explore nurses' competency and routinely track the effect of continuing education on competence. Continuous evaluation of nurses' clinical-based competence using the CSCN is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":49158,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Research","volume":"30 2","pages":"e198"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychometric Testing of the Newly Developed Competence Scale for Clinical Nurses.\",\"authors\":\"Chia-Chan Kao,&nbsp;Hsiu-Ling Chao,&nbsp;Yi-Hui Liu,&nbsp;I-Ju Pan,&nbsp;Li-Hui Yang,&nbsp;Wan-I Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/jnr.0000000000000472\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nursing competence is an essential element in ensuring high-quality nursing care and positive patient outcomes. Valid and reliable assessment tools for assessing nurse competence are needed to help nurse supervisors measure whether nurses are performing their job well and to provide a baseline for improving the competences of nurses.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study was designed to develop and psychometrically validate the Competence Scale for Clinical Nurses (CSCN).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The CSCN was developed in three steps: (a) generalize assessment items from nursing competence-related scales and a review of the relevant literature, (b) determine the content validity of the developed scale, and (c) psychometrically test the developed scale. Five hundred nurses were recruited from a medical center in southern Taiwan. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were executed to analyze construct validity and internal consistency reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The scale-content validity index was .87, as determined by five experts. Two thirds (63.29%) of the variance was explained by three factors: basic care skills (nine items), being dedicated to work (five items), and patient-centered and ethical considerations (four items). A second-order confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the data fit the model well. The Cronbach's alpha coefficients for each of the three factors and the total scale were .84-.91.</p><p><strong>Conclusions/implications for practice: </strong>The 18-item CSCN is a feasible and time-efficient tool for assessing competence in clinical nurses. Nursing supervisors may use this tool to explore nurses' competency and routinely track the effect of continuing education on competence. Continuous evaluation of nurses' clinical-based competence using the CSCN is recommended.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nursing Research\",\"volume\":\"30 2\",\"pages\":\"e198\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nursing Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/jnr.0000000000000472\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/jnr.0000000000000472","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:护理能力是确保高质量护理和积极患者预后的基本要素。需要有效和可靠的评估工具来评估护士的能力,以帮助护士主管衡量护士是否做好他们的工作,并为提高护士的能力提供基线。目的:本研究旨在编制临床护士胜任力量表(CSCN),并进行心理计量学上的验证。方法:CSCN的编制分为三个步骤:(a)对护理能力相关量表的评估项目进行归纳和相关文献的回顾;(b)确定编制的量表的内容效度;(c)对编制的量表进行心理测量学测试。从台湾南部的一家医疗中心招募了500名护士。采用探索性和验证性因子分析分析结构效度和内部一致性信度。结果:经5位专家评定,量表-内容效度指数为0.87。三分之二(63.29%)的差异被三个因素解释:基本护理技能(9项),致力于工作(5项),以及以患者为中心和道德考虑(4项)。二阶验证性因子分析表明,数据与模型拟合良好。三个因素和总量表的Cronbach's alpha系数分别为0.84 - 0.91。结论/实践意义:18项CSCN是评估临床护士能力的一种可行且省时的工具。护理主管可以使用这个工具来探索护士的能力,并定期跟踪继续教育对能力的影响。建议使用CSCN对护士的临床能力进行持续评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Psychometric Testing of the Newly Developed Competence Scale for Clinical Nurses.

Background: Nursing competence is an essential element in ensuring high-quality nursing care and positive patient outcomes. Valid and reliable assessment tools for assessing nurse competence are needed to help nurse supervisors measure whether nurses are performing their job well and to provide a baseline for improving the competences of nurses.

Purpose: This study was designed to develop and psychometrically validate the Competence Scale for Clinical Nurses (CSCN).

Methods: The CSCN was developed in three steps: (a) generalize assessment items from nursing competence-related scales and a review of the relevant literature, (b) determine the content validity of the developed scale, and (c) psychometrically test the developed scale. Five hundred nurses were recruited from a medical center in southern Taiwan. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were executed to analyze construct validity and internal consistency reliability.

Results: The scale-content validity index was .87, as determined by five experts. Two thirds (63.29%) of the variance was explained by three factors: basic care skills (nine items), being dedicated to work (five items), and patient-centered and ethical considerations (four items). A second-order confirmatory factor analysis indicated that the data fit the model well. The Cronbach's alpha coefficients for each of the three factors and the total scale were .84-.91.

Conclusions/implications for practice: The 18-item CSCN is a feasible and time-efficient tool for assessing competence in clinical nurses. Nursing supervisors may use this tool to explore nurses' competency and routinely track the effect of continuing education on competence. Continuous evaluation of nurses' clinical-based competence using the CSCN is recommended.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
60
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​The Journal of Nursing Research (JNR) is comprised of original articles that come from a variety of national and international institutions and reflect trends and issues of contemporary nursing practice in Taiwan. All articles are published in English so that JNR can better serve the whole nursing profession and introduce nursing in Taiwan to people around the world. Topics cover not only the field of nursing but also related fields such as psychology, education, management and statistics.
期刊最新文献
Dietary Management in Individuals With Serious Mental Illness and Comorbid Diabetes: A Focused Ethnography Study. Exploring the Difficulties and Strategies of Family Caregivers in Caring for Patients With Dementia in Acute Care Wards. Correlation Among Workplace Burnout, Resilience, and Well-Being in Nursing Staff: A Cross-Sectional Study in Taiwan. Factors Associated With HIV-Related Stigma Among Indonesian Healthcare Workers: A Cross-Sectional Online Survey. Validation of the Korean Version of the Assessment of Strategies in Families-Effectiveness Scale.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1