远程医疗在脑肿瘤神经外科随访中的应用安全性。

IF 2.4 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neuro-oncology practice Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI:10.1093/nop/npac060
Alexis A Morell, Nitesh V Patel, Tiffany A Eatz, Adam S Levy, Daniel G Eichberg, Ashish H Shah, Evan Luther, Victor M Lu, Michael Kader, Dominique M O Higgins, Michael E Ivan, Ricardo J Komotar
{"title":"远程医疗在脑肿瘤神经外科随访中的应用安全性。","authors":"Alexis A Morell,&nbsp;Nitesh V Patel,&nbsp;Tiffany A Eatz,&nbsp;Adam S Levy,&nbsp;Daniel G Eichberg,&nbsp;Ashish H Shah,&nbsp;Evan Luther,&nbsp;Victor M Lu,&nbsp;Michael Kader,&nbsp;Dominique M O Higgins,&nbsp;Michael E Ivan,&nbsp;Ricardo J Komotar","doi":"10.1093/nop/npac060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a need to evaluate the outcomes of patients who underwent brain tumor surgery with subsequent telemedicine or in-person follow-up during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively included all patients who underwent surgery for brain tumor resection by a single neurosurgeon at our Institution from the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic restrictions (March 2020) to August 2021. Outcomes were assessed by stratifying the patients using their preference for follow-up method (telemedicine or in-person).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three-hundred and eighteen (318) brain tumor patients who were included. The follow-up method of choice was telemedicine (TM) in 185 patients (58.17%), and in-person (IP) consults in 133 patients. We found that patients followed by TM lived significantly farther, with a median of 36.34 miles, compared to a median of 22.23 miles in the IP cohort (<i>P</i> = .0025). We found no statistical difference between the TM and the IP group, when comparing visits to the emergency department (ED) within 30 days after surgery (7.3% vs 6.01%, <i>P</i> = .72). Readmission rates, wound infections, and 30-day mortality were similar in both cohorts. These findings were also consistent after matching cohorts using a propensity score. The percentage of telemedicine follow-up consults was higher in the first semester (73.17%) of the COVID-19 pandemic, compared to the second (46.21%), and third semesters (47.86%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Telehealth follow-up alternatives may be safely offered to patients after brain tumor surgery, thereby reducing patient burden in those with longer distances to the hospital or special situations as the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":19234,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology practice","volume":"10 1","pages":"97-103"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9384682/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety of the utilization of telemedicine for brain tumor neurosurgery follow-up.\",\"authors\":\"Alexis A Morell,&nbsp;Nitesh V Patel,&nbsp;Tiffany A Eatz,&nbsp;Adam S Levy,&nbsp;Daniel G Eichberg,&nbsp;Ashish H Shah,&nbsp;Evan Luther,&nbsp;Victor M Lu,&nbsp;Michael Kader,&nbsp;Dominique M O Higgins,&nbsp;Michael E Ivan,&nbsp;Ricardo J Komotar\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/nop/npac060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a need to evaluate the outcomes of patients who underwent brain tumor surgery with subsequent telemedicine or in-person follow-up during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively included all patients who underwent surgery for brain tumor resection by a single neurosurgeon at our Institution from the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic restrictions (March 2020) to August 2021. Outcomes were assessed by stratifying the patients using their preference for follow-up method (telemedicine or in-person).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three-hundred and eighteen (318) brain tumor patients who were included. The follow-up method of choice was telemedicine (TM) in 185 patients (58.17%), and in-person (IP) consults in 133 patients. We found that patients followed by TM lived significantly farther, with a median of 36.34 miles, compared to a median of 22.23 miles in the IP cohort (<i>P</i> = .0025). We found no statistical difference between the TM and the IP group, when comparing visits to the emergency department (ED) within 30 days after surgery (7.3% vs 6.01%, <i>P</i> = .72). Readmission rates, wound infections, and 30-day mortality were similar in both cohorts. These findings were also consistent after matching cohorts using a propensity score. The percentage of telemedicine follow-up consults was higher in the first semester (73.17%) of the COVID-19 pandemic, compared to the second (46.21%), and third semesters (47.86%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Telehealth follow-up alternatives may be safely offered to patients after brain tumor surgery, thereby reducing patient burden in those with longer distances to the hospital or special situations as the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuro-oncology practice\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"97-103\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9384682/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuro-oncology practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/nop/npac060\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuro-oncology practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/nop/npac060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:有必要评估在COVID-19大流行期间接受脑肿瘤手术的患者随后进行远程医疗或现场随访的结果。方法:我们回顾性纳入了从COVID-19大流行限制开始(2020年3月)到2021年8月在我们机构由一名神经外科医生进行脑肿瘤切除术的所有患者。通过患者偏好的随访方法(远程医疗或面对面)对结果进行分层评估。结果:共纳入318例脑肿瘤患者。随访方式选择远程医疗(TM) 185例(58.17%),当面咨询(IP) 133例。我们发现,与IP队列的中位数22.23英里相比,TM患者的中位数寿命明显更长,为36.34英里(P = 0.0025)。在比较手术后30天内急诊科(ED)就诊情况时,我们发现TM组与IP组之间无统计学差异(7.3% vs 6.01%, P = 0.72)。两组患者的再入院率、伤口感染和30天死亡率相似。在使用倾向评分匹配队列后,这些发现也是一致的。新冠肺炎大流行的第一学期(73.17%)远程医疗随访问诊比例高于第二学期(46.21%)和第三学期(47.86%)。结论:脑肿瘤手术后可安全提供远程医疗随访替代方案,从而减轻距离医院较远或COVID-19大流行等特殊情况下患者的负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Safety of the utilization of telemedicine for brain tumor neurosurgery follow-up.

Background: There is a need to evaluate the outcomes of patients who underwent brain tumor surgery with subsequent telemedicine or in-person follow-up during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: We retrospectively included all patients who underwent surgery for brain tumor resection by a single neurosurgeon at our Institution from the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic restrictions (March 2020) to August 2021. Outcomes were assessed by stratifying the patients using their preference for follow-up method (telemedicine or in-person).

Results: Three-hundred and eighteen (318) brain tumor patients who were included. The follow-up method of choice was telemedicine (TM) in 185 patients (58.17%), and in-person (IP) consults in 133 patients. We found that patients followed by TM lived significantly farther, with a median of 36.34 miles, compared to a median of 22.23 miles in the IP cohort (P = .0025). We found no statistical difference between the TM and the IP group, when comparing visits to the emergency department (ED) within 30 days after surgery (7.3% vs 6.01%, P = .72). Readmission rates, wound infections, and 30-day mortality were similar in both cohorts. These findings were also consistent after matching cohorts using a propensity score. The percentage of telemedicine follow-up consults was higher in the first semester (73.17%) of the COVID-19 pandemic, compared to the second (46.21%), and third semesters (47.86%).

Conclusions: Telehealth follow-up alternatives may be safely offered to patients after brain tumor surgery, thereby reducing patient burden in those with longer distances to the hospital or special situations as the COVID-19 pandemic.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuro-oncology practice
Neuro-oncology practice CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
92
期刊介绍: Neuro-Oncology Practice focuses on the clinical aspects of the subspecialty for practicing clinicians and healthcare specialists from a variety of disciplines including physicians, nurses, physical/occupational therapists, neuropsychologists, and palliative care specialists, who have focused their careers on clinical patient care and who want to apply the latest treatment advances to their practice. These include: Applying new trial results to improve standards of patient care Translating scientific advances such as tumor molecular profiling and advanced imaging into clinical treatment decision making and personalized brain tumor therapies Raising awareness of basic, translational and clinical research in areas of symptom management, survivorship, neurocognitive function, end of life issues and caregiving
期刊最新文献
Reviewer List for the year 2024. Should we be testing for germline and "actionable" mutations in all glioma patients? Foreword. Role of the tumor board when prescribing mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase inhibitors to patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase-mutant glioma. Financial challenges of being on long-term, high-cost medications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1