替代性听力校准方法:评估用于听力校准的声级测量应用程序

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Journal of Communication Disorders Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2023.106351
King Chung
{"title":"替代性听力校准方法:评估用于听力校准的声级测量应用程序","authors":"King Chung","doi":"10.1016/j.jcomdis.2023.106351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Audiometric calibration, which includes the calibration of different audiometer transducers and the measurements of ambient noise levels, is historically carried out using Class 1 sound level meters. As technologies advance, many mobile applications (apps) have been developed to measure sound levels. These apps can provide alternative methods for audiometric calibration in places where sound level meters are not available, such as field testing environments, low-to-mid-income countries, and humanitarian settings. These apps, however, cannot be used for audiometric calibration without first evaluating their performance, which depends on multiple factors including the external components (if any), the operating system and the hardware of the electronic devices. The evaluation of the apps is actually the evaluation of the app and associated factors (i.e., the app systems). This paper discusses methods to assess several key functions of apps implemented in either Android or iOS operation system for audiometric calibration: 1) checking the measurement accuracy at all testing frequencies, 2) deriving and using correction factors, 3) determining the self-noise levels, and 4) evaluating the linear/measurement range. As audiometric calibration usually uses octave or 1/3 octave bands to measure sound pressure levels of tones and narrowband noises with relatively steady temporal characteristics, the accuracy of an app can be evaluated by comparing the levels measured by the app and a Class 1 sound level meter at each frequency. The level difference between the app and the Class 1 sound level meter at each frequency can then be used to calculate correction factors that can be added to subsequent levels measured by the app to improve its accuracy. In addition, methods to determine the self-noise level and the linearity range of apps are discussed. Sample measurement scenarios and alternative methods are provided to illustrate the evaluation process to determine whether an app is suitable for measuring ambient noise levels and for calibrating different audiometric transducers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49175,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Communication Disorders","volume":"105 ","pages":"Article 106351"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Alternative audiometric calibration methods: Evaluation of sound level measuring apps for audiometric calibration\",\"authors\":\"King Chung\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcomdis.2023.106351\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Audiometric calibration, which includes the calibration of different audiometer transducers and the measurements of ambient noise levels, is historically carried out using Class 1 sound level meters. As technologies advance, many mobile applications (apps) have been developed to measure sound levels. These apps can provide alternative methods for audiometric calibration in places where sound level meters are not available, such as field testing environments, low-to-mid-income countries, and humanitarian settings. These apps, however, cannot be used for audiometric calibration without first evaluating their performance, which depends on multiple factors including the external components (if any), the operating system and the hardware of the electronic devices. The evaluation of the apps is actually the evaluation of the app and associated factors (i.e., the app systems). This paper discusses methods to assess several key functions of apps implemented in either Android or iOS operation system for audiometric calibration: 1) checking the measurement accuracy at all testing frequencies, 2) deriving and using correction factors, 3) determining the self-noise levels, and 4) evaluating the linear/measurement range. As audiometric calibration usually uses octave or 1/3 octave bands to measure sound pressure levels of tones and narrowband noises with relatively steady temporal characteristics, the accuracy of an app can be evaluated by comparing the levels measured by the app and a Class 1 sound level meter at each frequency. The level difference between the app and the Class 1 sound level meter at each frequency can then be used to calculate correction factors that can be added to subsequent levels measured by the app to improve its accuracy. In addition, methods to determine the self-noise level and the linearity range of apps are discussed. Sample measurement scenarios and alternative methods are provided to illustrate the evaluation process to determine whether an app is suitable for measuring ambient noise levels and for calibrating different audiometric transducers.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49175,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Communication Disorders\",\"volume\":\"105 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106351\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Communication Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021992423000515\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Communication Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021992423000515","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

听力校准,包括不同听力计换能器的校准和环境噪声水平的测量,历史上使用1级声级计进行。随着技术的进步,许多移动应用程序(app)被开发出来测量声级。这些应用程序可以在没有声级计的地方,如现场测试环境、中低收入国家和人道主义环境中,为听力测量校准提供替代方法。然而,这些应用程序在没有首先评估其性能之前不能用于听力校准,这取决于多种因素,包括外部组件(如果有的话),操作系统和电子设备的硬件。对应用程序的评估实际上是对应用程序及其相关因素(即应用程序系统)的评估。本文讨论了在Android或iOS操作系统中实现的听力校准应用程序的几个关键功能的评估方法:1)检查所有测试频率下的测量精度,2)推导和使用校正因子,3)确定自噪声级,4)评估线性/测量范围。由于测听校准通常使用倍频或1/3倍频带来测量具有相对稳定时间特性的音调和窄带噪声的声压级,因此可以通过将应用程序测量的声压级与每个频率的1级声级计进行比较来评估应用程序的准确性。然后,应用程序和1级声级计在每个频率上的声级差可以用来计算校正因子,这些校正因子可以添加到应用程序测量的后续声级中,以提高其准确性。此外,还讨论了确定自噪声级和应用程序线性范围的方法。示例测量场景和替代方法提供了说明评估过程,以确定一个应用程序是否适合测量环境噪声水平和校准不同的听力传感器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Alternative audiometric calibration methods: Evaluation of sound level measuring apps for audiometric calibration

Audiometric calibration, which includes the calibration of different audiometer transducers and the measurements of ambient noise levels, is historically carried out using Class 1 sound level meters. As technologies advance, many mobile applications (apps) have been developed to measure sound levels. These apps can provide alternative methods for audiometric calibration in places where sound level meters are not available, such as field testing environments, low-to-mid-income countries, and humanitarian settings. These apps, however, cannot be used for audiometric calibration without first evaluating their performance, which depends on multiple factors including the external components (if any), the operating system and the hardware of the electronic devices. The evaluation of the apps is actually the evaluation of the app and associated factors (i.e., the app systems). This paper discusses methods to assess several key functions of apps implemented in either Android or iOS operation system for audiometric calibration: 1) checking the measurement accuracy at all testing frequencies, 2) deriving and using correction factors, 3) determining the self-noise levels, and 4) evaluating the linear/measurement range. As audiometric calibration usually uses octave or 1/3 octave bands to measure sound pressure levels of tones and narrowband noises with relatively steady temporal characteristics, the accuracy of an app can be evaluated by comparing the levels measured by the app and a Class 1 sound level meter at each frequency. The level difference between the app and the Class 1 sound level meter at each frequency can then be used to calculate correction factors that can be added to subsequent levels measured by the app to improve its accuracy. In addition, methods to determine the self-noise level and the linearity range of apps are discussed. Sample measurement scenarios and alternative methods are provided to illustrate the evaluation process to determine whether an app is suitable for measuring ambient noise levels and for calibrating different audiometric transducers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Communication Disorders
Journal of Communication Disorders AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
71
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Communication Disorders publishes original articles on topics related to disorders of speech, language and hearing. Authors are encouraged to submit reports of experimental or descriptive investigations (research articles), review articles, tutorials or discussion papers, or letters to the editor ("short communications"). Please note that we do not accept case studies unless they conform to the principles of single-subject experimental design. Special issues are published periodically on timely and clinically relevant topics.
期刊最新文献
Dynamic assessment of word learning as a predictor of response to vocabulary intervention Editorial Board Shifting from a female-dominated profession: The perceptions and experiences of male students in communication sciences and disorders Cognitive processing biases of social anxiety in adults who do and do not stutter Linguistic factors associated with stuttering-like disfluencies in Japanese preschool and school-aged children who stutter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1