CRP与SAA在炎症性肝腺瘤鉴别中的比较。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY Applied Immunohistochemistry & Molecular Morphology Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-13 DOI:10.1097/PAI.0000000000001155
Gwyneth S T Soon, Saba Yasir, Dhanpat Jain, Sanjay Kakar, Tsung-Teh Wu, Matthew M Yeh, Michael S Torbenson, Zongming Eric Chen
{"title":"CRP与SAA在炎症性肝腺瘤鉴别中的比较。","authors":"Gwyneth S T Soon,&nbsp;Saba Yasir,&nbsp;Dhanpat Jain,&nbsp;Sanjay Kakar,&nbsp;Tsung-Teh Wu,&nbsp;Matthew M Yeh,&nbsp;Michael S Torbenson,&nbsp;Zongming Eric Chen","doi":"10.1097/PAI.0000000000001155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Subtyping hepatic adenomas is important for patient management due to differing complication risks. Immunohistochemical staining with C-reactive protein (CRP) and serum amyloid-A (SAA) is widely accepted as a surrogate for molecular classification to identify inflammatory hepatocellular adenomas. Limited data, however, has been published on how these 2 stains compare for sensitivity. We conducted a large, multicenter, retrospective study to examine the sensitivity and staining characteristics of CRP and SAA in inflammatory hepatic adenomas, with focal nodular hyperplasia (FNHs) as a control group. Inflammatory adenomas were identified in 133 patients (average age 37 years, 109 were female). In all, 69.9% of cases were resection specimens and 90.2% of all cases showed positive staining for both CRP and SAA; 10 (7.5%) were positive for CRP only and 3 (2.3%) were positive for SAA only. CRP was more sensitive than SAA (97.74% vs. 92.48%, P -value = 0.0961) and showed more extensive and intense staining, with a significantly higher modified H-score ( P <0.001). Focal nodular hyperplasia can also show positive CRP and SAA staining but with a lower modified H-score ( P <0.0001). Based on beta-catenin and glutamine synthetase staining, 26 of inflammatory adenomas also had beta-catenin activation (19.5%). All 3 cases with positive SAA and negative CRP staining were beta-catenin activated. In contrast, the proportion of cases that were CRP positive and SAA negative was similar regardless of beta-catenin activation. The data affirms the strategy of using both CRP and SAA immunostains for hepatic adenoma subtyping and raises the awareness of the highly variable nature of SAA staining characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":48952,"journal":{"name":"Applied Immunohistochemistry & Molecular Morphology","volume":" ","pages":"590-595"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CRP Versus SAA for Identification of Inflammatory Hepatic Adenomas.\",\"authors\":\"Gwyneth S T Soon,&nbsp;Saba Yasir,&nbsp;Dhanpat Jain,&nbsp;Sanjay Kakar,&nbsp;Tsung-Teh Wu,&nbsp;Matthew M Yeh,&nbsp;Michael S Torbenson,&nbsp;Zongming Eric Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PAI.0000000000001155\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Subtyping hepatic adenomas is important for patient management due to differing complication risks. Immunohistochemical staining with C-reactive protein (CRP) and serum amyloid-A (SAA) is widely accepted as a surrogate for molecular classification to identify inflammatory hepatocellular adenomas. Limited data, however, has been published on how these 2 stains compare for sensitivity. We conducted a large, multicenter, retrospective study to examine the sensitivity and staining characteristics of CRP and SAA in inflammatory hepatic adenomas, with focal nodular hyperplasia (FNHs) as a control group. Inflammatory adenomas were identified in 133 patients (average age 37 years, 109 were female). In all, 69.9% of cases were resection specimens and 90.2% of all cases showed positive staining for both CRP and SAA; 10 (7.5%) were positive for CRP only and 3 (2.3%) were positive for SAA only. CRP was more sensitive than SAA (97.74% vs. 92.48%, P -value = 0.0961) and showed more extensive and intense staining, with a significantly higher modified H-score ( P <0.001). Focal nodular hyperplasia can also show positive CRP and SAA staining but with a lower modified H-score ( P <0.0001). Based on beta-catenin and glutamine synthetase staining, 26 of inflammatory adenomas also had beta-catenin activation (19.5%). All 3 cases with positive SAA and negative CRP staining were beta-catenin activated. In contrast, the proportion of cases that were CRP positive and SAA negative was similar regardless of beta-catenin activation. The data affirms the strategy of using both CRP and SAA immunostains for hepatic adenoma subtyping and raises the awareness of the highly variable nature of SAA staining characteristics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48952,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Immunohistochemistry & Molecular Morphology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"590-595\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Immunohistochemistry & Molecular Morphology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PAI.0000000000001155\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Immunohistochemistry & Molecular Morphology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PAI.0000000000001155","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于并发症风险不同,肝腺瘤亚型对患者管理很重要。C反应蛋白(CRP)和血清淀粉样蛋白-A(SAA)的免疫组织化学染色被广泛接受为识别炎症性肝细胞腺瘤的分子分类的替代品。然而,关于这两种污渍的敏感性比较数据有限。我们进行了一项大型、多中心、回顾性研究,以局灶性结节性增生(FNHs)为对照组,检查炎症性肝腺瘤中CRP和SAA的敏感性和染色特征。在133名患者中发现了炎症性腺瘤(平均年龄37岁,109人为女性)。总的来说,69.9%的病例是切除标本,90.2%的病例显示CRP和SAA阳性;10例(7.5%)仅CRP阳性,3例(2.3%)仅SAA阳性。CRP比SAA更敏感(97.74%对92.48%,P值=0.0961),并且显示出更广泛和更强烈的染色,具有显著更高的修饰H核(P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CRP Versus SAA for Identification of Inflammatory Hepatic Adenomas.

Subtyping hepatic adenomas is important for patient management due to differing complication risks. Immunohistochemical staining with C-reactive protein (CRP) and serum amyloid-A (SAA) is widely accepted as a surrogate for molecular classification to identify inflammatory hepatocellular adenomas. Limited data, however, has been published on how these 2 stains compare for sensitivity. We conducted a large, multicenter, retrospective study to examine the sensitivity and staining characteristics of CRP and SAA in inflammatory hepatic adenomas, with focal nodular hyperplasia (FNHs) as a control group. Inflammatory adenomas were identified in 133 patients (average age 37 years, 109 were female). In all, 69.9% of cases were resection specimens and 90.2% of all cases showed positive staining for both CRP and SAA; 10 (7.5%) were positive for CRP only and 3 (2.3%) were positive for SAA only. CRP was more sensitive than SAA (97.74% vs. 92.48%, P -value = 0.0961) and showed more extensive and intense staining, with a significantly higher modified H-score ( P <0.001). Focal nodular hyperplasia can also show positive CRP and SAA staining but with a lower modified H-score ( P <0.0001). Based on beta-catenin and glutamine synthetase staining, 26 of inflammatory adenomas also had beta-catenin activation (19.5%). All 3 cases with positive SAA and negative CRP staining were beta-catenin activated. In contrast, the proportion of cases that were CRP positive and SAA negative was similar regardless of beta-catenin activation. The data affirms the strategy of using both CRP and SAA immunostains for hepatic adenoma subtyping and raises the awareness of the highly variable nature of SAA staining characteristics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Immunohistochemistry & Molecular Morphology
Applied Immunohistochemistry & Molecular Morphology ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY-MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
153
期刊介绍: ​Applied Immunohistochemistry & Molecular Morphology covers newly developed identification and detection technologies, and their applications in research and diagnosis for the applied immunohistochemist & molecular Morphologist. Official Journal of the International Society for Immunohistochemisty and Molecular Morphology​.
期刊最新文献
Immunohistochemical Investigation of the Proliferative Activity of Odontogenic Cysts and Tumors. Expression of ALKBH5 in Odontogenic Lesions. Expression and Clinical Significance of Nuclear Phosphoglucomutase-1 in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Expression of B7-H3 and B7-H4 in Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors. A Modified Bleaching Method for Multiplex Immunofluorescence Staining of FFPE Tissue Sections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1