独立创伤性脑损伤患者预后两种模型的内部验证。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Turkish neurosurgery Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.30145-20.6
Ahmet Tolgay Akinci, Osman Simsek, Kocaturk Murat
{"title":"独立创伤性脑损伤患者预后两种模型的内部验证。","authors":"Ahmet Tolgay Akinci,&nbsp;Osman Simsek,&nbsp;Kocaturk Murat","doi":"10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.30145-20.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the efficiency of two models for prognostication of patients with isolated traumatic brain injury.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The models developed with the data of the patients who applied within ten years were subjected to internal validation with the data of the patients who applied within the following five years. The records of 204 patients with traumatic brain injury admitted into Neurosurgery Department and Intensive Care Units were reviewed. Models were applied to procure estimates of prognosis. The estimates were statistically compared with the actual clinical outcome of patients using discriminant analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For Model 1, the correct classification rate was calculated as 87.9%, the specificity as 66.7%, the sensitivity as 94.2%, the positive predictive value as 68.8%, and the negative predictive value as 93.6%. For Model 2 the correct classification rate was evaluated as 90.2%, the specificity as 57.6%, the sensitivity as 96.5%, the positive predictive value as 76%, and the negative predictive value as 92.2%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both of the models had decent correct classification rates and may be efficient estimation tools for the prognostication of unfavourable outcome in patients with isolated traumatic brain injury. These models are good candidates to be used widely following the evaluation of their validity with national and international multicentric studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":23395,"journal":{"name":"Turkish neurosurgery","volume":"33 1","pages":"25-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Internal Validation of Two Models Developed for Prognostication of Patients with Isolated Traumatic Brain Injury.\",\"authors\":\"Ahmet Tolgay Akinci,&nbsp;Osman Simsek,&nbsp;Kocaturk Murat\",\"doi\":\"10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.30145-20.6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the efficiency of two models for prognostication of patients with isolated traumatic brain injury.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The models developed with the data of the patients who applied within ten years were subjected to internal validation with the data of the patients who applied within the following five years. The records of 204 patients with traumatic brain injury admitted into Neurosurgery Department and Intensive Care Units were reviewed. Models were applied to procure estimates of prognosis. The estimates were statistically compared with the actual clinical outcome of patients using discriminant analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For Model 1, the correct classification rate was calculated as 87.9%, the specificity as 66.7%, the sensitivity as 94.2%, the positive predictive value as 68.8%, and the negative predictive value as 93.6%. For Model 2 the correct classification rate was evaluated as 90.2%, the specificity as 57.6%, the sensitivity as 96.5%, the positive predictive value as 76%, and the negative predictive value as 92.2%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both of the models had decent correct classification rates and may be efficient estimation tools for the prognostication of unfavourable outcome in patients with isolated traumatic brain injury. These models are good candidates to be used widely following the evaluation of their validity with national and international multicentric studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23395,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turkish neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"25-30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turkish neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.30145-20.6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.30145-20.6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价两种模型对孤立性创伤性脑损伤患者预后的预测效果。材料与方法:使用10年内申请的患者数据建立模型,并使用随后5年内申请的患者数据进行内部验证。回顾了204例颅脑损伤患者在神经外科及重症监护病房的治疗记录。应用模型来估计预后。使用判别分析将估计结果与患者的实际临床结果进行统计学比较。结果:模型1的正确分类率为87.9%,特异性为66.7%,敏感性为94.2%,阳性预测值为68.8%,阴性预测值为93.6%。模型2的正确分类率为90.2%,特异性为57.6%,敏感性为96.5%,阳性预测值为76%,阴性预测值为92.2%。结论:两种模型均具有良好的正确分类率,可作为孤立性创伤性脑损伤患者不良预后预测的有效工具。这些模型在国内和国际多中心研究中评估其有效性后,是广泛使用的良好候选者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Internal Validation of Two Models Developed for Prognostication of Patients with Isolated Traumatic Brain Injury.

Aim: To evaluate the efficiency of two models for prognostication of patients with isolated traumatic brain injury.

Material and methods: The models developed with the data of the patients who applied within ten years were subjected to internal validation with the data of the patients who applied within the following five years. The records of 204 patients with traumatic brain injury admitted into Neurosurgery Department and Intensive Care Units were reviewed. Models were applied to procure estimates of prognosis. The estimates were statistically compared with the actual clinical outcome of patients using discriminant analysis.

Results: For Model 1, the correct classification rate was calculated as 87.9%, the specificity as 66.7%, the sensitivity as 94.2%, the positive predictive value as 68.8%, and the negative predictive value as 93.6%. For Model 2 the correct classification rate was evaluated as 90.2%, the specificity as 57.6%, the sensitivity as 96.5%, the positive predictive value as 76%, and the negative predictive value as 92.2%.

Conclusion: Both of the models had decent correct classification rates and may be efficient estimation tools for the prognostication of unfavourable outcome in patients with isolated traumatic brain injury. These models are good candidates to be used widely following the evaluation of their validity with national and international multicentric studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Turkish neurosurgery
Turkish neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
126
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Turkish Neurosurgery is a peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary, open access and totally free journal directed at an audience of neurosurgery physicians and scientists. The official language of the journal is English. The journal publishes original articles in the form of clinical and basic research. Turkish Neurosurgery will only publish studies that have institutional review board (IRB) approval and have strictly observed an acceptable follow-up period. With the exception of reference presentation, Turkish Neurosurgery requires that all manuscripts be prepared in accordance with the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals.
期刊最新文献
Changes in the Lumbosacral Angle after Spinal Cord Untethering in 23 Children with Tethered Cord Syndrome. Multiple Pathway-Dephosphorylated ASK-1 Confers Temozolomide-Resistance to Human Glioma Cells. A Nomogram Model for Predicting Prognosis of Patients with Medulloblastoma. Percutaneous Vertebroplasty with the Polymethyl Methacrylate - Gelatin Sponge Complex in the Treatment of Patients with Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures Accompanied by Superior Endplate Injurie. Risk Factors for Intracranial Aneurysm Rupture: A Clinical Case Series and Systematic Review of the Literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1