Bilal Al-Nawas, Tara Aghaloo, Carlos Aparicio, Edmond Bedrossian, Lawrence Brecht, Matthew Brennand-Roper, James Chow, Rubén Davó, Shengchi Fan, Ronald Jung, Peer W Kämmerer, Vinay V Kumar, Wei-Shao Lin, Chantal Malevez, Dean Morton, Justin Pijpe, Waldemar D Polido, Gerry M Raghoebar, Lambert J Stumpel, Frank J Tuminelli, Jean-Baptiste Verdino, Arjan Vissink, Yiqun Wu, Sepehr Zarrine
{"title":"ITI关于颧骨植入物的共识报告:适应症,手术技术评估和长期治疗结果。","authors":"Bilal Al-Nawas, Tara Aghaloo, Carlos Aparicio, Edmond Bedrossian, Lawrence Brecht, Matthew Brennand-Roper, James Chow, Rubén Davó, Shengchi Fan, Ronald Jung, Peer W Kämmerer, Vinay V Kumar, Wei-Shao Lin, Chantal Malevez, Dean Morton, Justin Pijpe, Waldemar D Polido, Gerry M Raghoebar, Lambert J Stumpel, Frank J Tuminelli, Jean-Baptiste Verdino, Arjan Vissink, Yiqun Wu, Sepehr Zarrine","doi":"10.1186/s40729-023-00489-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of the ITI Consensus Workshop on zygomatic implants was to provide Consensus Statements and Clinical Recommendations for the use of zygomatic implants.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Three systematic reviews and one narrative review were written to address focused questions on (1) the indications for the use of zygomatic implants; (2) the survival rates and complications associated with surgery in zygomatic implant placement; (3) long-term survival rates of zygomatic implants and (4) the biomechanical principles involved when zygoma implants are placed under functional loads. Based on the reviews, three working groups then developed Consensus Statements and Clinical Recommendations. These were discussed in a plenary and finalized in Delphi rounds.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 21 Consensus Statements were developed from the systematic reviews. Additionally, the group developed 17 Clinical Recommendations based on the Consensus Statements and the combined expertise of the participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Zygomatic implants are mainly indicated in cases with maxillary bone atrophy or deficiency. Long-term mean zygomatic implant survival was 96.2% [95% CI 93.8; 97.7] over a mean follow-up of 75.4 months (6.3 years) with a follow-up range of 36-141.6 months (3-11.8 years). Immediate loading showed a statistically significant increase in survival over delayed loading. Sinusitis presented with a total prevalence of 14.2% [95% CI 8.8; 22.0] over a mean 65.4 months follow-up, representing the most common complication which may lead to zygomatic implant loss. The international experts suggested clinical recommendations regarding planning, surgery, restoration, outcomes, and the patient's perspective.</p>","PeriodicalId":14076,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Implant Dentistry","volume":"9 1","pages":"28"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10497463/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ITI consensus report on zygomatic implants: indications, evaluation of surgical techniques and long-term treatment outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Bilal Al-Nawas, Tara Aghaloo, Carlos Aparicio, Edmond Bedrossian, Lawrence Brecht, Matthew Brennand-Roper, James Chow, Rubén Davó, Shengchi Fan, Ronald Jung, Peer W Kämmerer, Vinay V Kumar, Wei-Shao Lin, Chantal Malevez, Dean Morton, Justin Pijpe, Waldemar D Polido, Gerry M Raghoebar, Lambert J Stumpel, Frank J Tuminelli, Jean-Baptiste Verdino, Arjan Vissink, Yiqun Wu, Sepehr Zarrine\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40729-023-00489-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of the ITI Consensus Workshop on zygomatic implants was to provide Consensus Statements and Clinical Recommendations for the use of zygomatic implants.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Three systematic reviews and one narrative review were written to address focused questions on (1) the indications for the use of zygomatic implants; (2) the survival rates and complications associated with surgery in zygomatic implant placement; (3) long-term survival rates of zygomatic implants and (4) the biomechanical principles involved when zygoma implants are placed under functional loads. Based on the reviews, three working groups then developed Consensus Statements and Clinical Recommendations. These were discussed in a plenary and finalized in Delphi rounds.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 21 Consensus Statements were developed from the systematic reviews. Additionally, the group developed 17 Clinical Recommendations based on the Consensus Statements and the combined expertise of the participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Zygomatic implants are mainly indicated in cases with maxillary bone atrophy or deficiency. Long-term mean zygomatic implant survival was 96.2% [95% CI 93.8; 97.7] over a mean follow-up of 75.4 months (6.3 years) with a follow-up range of 36-141.6 months (3-11.8 years). Immediate loading showed a statistically significant increase in survival over delayed loading. Sinusitis presented with a total prevalence of 14.2% [95% CI 8.8; 22.0] over a mean 65.4 months follow-up, representing the most common complication which may lead to zygomatic implant loss. The international experts suggested clinical recommendations regarding planning, surgery, restoration, outcomes, and the patient's perspective.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Implant Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10497463/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Implant Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-023-00489-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Implant Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-023-00489-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:ITI颧骨种植体共识研讨会的目的是为颧骨种植体的使用提供共识声明和临床建议。材料和方法:撰写三篇系统综述和一篇叙述性综述,以解决以下重点问题:(1)颧骨植入物使用的适应症;(2)颧骨植入手术的生存率及并发症;(3)颧骨植入物的长期存活率;(4)颧骨植入物在功能负荷下的生物力学原理。基于这些评论,三个工作组随后制定了共识声明和临床建议。这些问题在全体会议上进行了讨论,并在德尔菲回合中最后定稿。结果:系统评价共形成21条共识声明。此外,该小组根据共识声明和参与者的综合专业知识制定了17项临床建议。结论:颧骨种植主要适用于上颌骨萎缩或缺损的病例。颧种植体长期平均成活率为96.2% [95% CI 93.8;[97.7]平均随访75.4个月(6.3年),随访时间36 ~ 141.6个月(3 ~ 11.8年)。与延迟加载相比,即时加载显示出统计学上显著的生存率增加。鼻窦炎的总患病率为14.2% [95% CI 8.8;[22.0]平均随访65.4个月,这是最常见的并发症,可能导致颧骨植入物丢失。国际专家就计划、手术、修复、结果和患者的观点提出了临床建议。
ITI consensus report on zygomatic implants: indications, evaluation of surgical techniques and long-term treatment outcomes.
Objectives: The aim of the ITI Consensus Workshop on zygomatic implants was to provide Consensus Statements and Clinical Recommendations for the use of zygomatic implants.
Materials and methods: Three systematic reviews and one narrative review were written to address focused questions on (1) the indications for the use of zygomatic implants; (2) the survival rates and complications associated with surgery in zygomatic implant placement; (3) long-term survival rates of zygomatic implants and (4) the biomechanical principles involved when zygoma implants are placed under functional loads. Based on the reviews, three working groups then developed Consensus Statements and Clinical Recommendations. These were discussed in a plenary and finalized in Delphi rounds.
Results: A total of 21 Consensus Statements were developed from the systematic reviews. Additionally, the group developed 17 Clinical Recommendations based on the Consensus Statements and the combined expertise of the participants.
Conclusions: Zygomatic implants are mainly indicated in cases with maxillary bone atrophy or deficiency. Long-term mean zygomatic implant survival was 96.2% [95% CI 93.8; 97.7] over a mean follow-up of 75.4 months (6.3 years) with a follow-up range of 36-141.6 months (3-11.8 years). Immediate loading showed a statistically significant increase in survival over delayed loading. Sinusitis presented with a total prevalence of 14.2% [95% CI 8.8; 22.0] over a mean 65.4 months follow-up, representing the most common complication which may lead to zygomatic implant loss. The international experts suggested clinical recommendations regarding planning, surgery, restoration, outcomes, and the patient's perspective.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Implant Dentistry is a peer-reviewed open access journal published under the SpringerOpen brand. The journal is dedicated to promoting the exchange and discussion of all research areas relevant to implant dentistry in the form of systematic literature or invited reviews, prospective and retrospective clinical studies, clinical case reports, basic laboratory and animal research, and articles on material research and engineering.