计算机断层扫描血管造影术确定的左心耳闭合最佳荧光透视投影角度的效率。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Hellenic Journal of Cardiology Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.hjc.2023.09.009
{"title":"计算机断层扫描血管造影术确定的左心耳闭合最佳荧光透视投影角度的效率。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.hjc.2023.09.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Left atrial appendage (LAA) closure (LAAC) procedures are conventionally performed using empirical fluoroscopic viewing angles. However, because the LAA is a highly variable anatomical structure, these angles cannot depict the LAA in the optimal position. The present study aimed to assess the efficiency of using a novel optimal fluoroscopic projection angle (OPA) for LAAC and to validate its feasibility.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The OPAs of the derivation cohort were acquired using cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) to assess its superiority for depicting LAA depth versus traditional working angles (TAs) of RAO 30°, CAU 20°. The practicability of OPA-guided LAAC was demonstrated by comparison between clinical data from the validation cohort and those from a propensity-score matched (PSM) control group, as well as randomized controlled studies investigating LAAC.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 705 patients in the derivation cohort, the median OPA was RAO 46°, CAU 31°. Compared with TA, the OPA depicted a longer mean (±SD) LAA depth (5.1 ± 4.4) mm and a larger orifice diameter (1.1 ± 1.1 mm), (P &lt; 0.0001 for both). All 38 OPA-guided LAACs were successful, with a shorter mean procedure duration (42.9 ± 12.3 min versus [vs.] 107.2 ± 41.5 min; P &lt; 0.0001) and reduced device consumption (1.08 vs. 1.5 per case), compared with the PSM control group. At the 3-month follow-up, the incidence of peri-device leak was 52.6% (20/38) detected by CCTA, with a mean leakage of 1.6 ± 0.8 mm.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>By unfolding the LAA depth and orifice diameter for a better view, OPA demonstrated the potential to optimize LAAC procedural efficiency, although further larger-scale studies are required to confirm this.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55062,"journal":{"name":"Hellenic Journal of Cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1109966623001793/pdfft?md5=86a89c29f25632e2842899cd3a3c3626&pid=1-s2.0-S1109966623001793-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficiency of optimal fluoroscopic projection angle defined by computed tomography angiography for left atrial appendage closure\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hjc.2023.09.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Left atrial appendage (LAA) closure (LAAC) procedures are conventionally performed using empirical fluoroscopic viewing angles. However, because the LAA is a highly variable anatomical structure, these angles cannot depict the LAA in the optimal position. The present study aimed to assess the efficiency of using a novel optimal fluoroscopic projection angle (OPA) for LAAC and to validate its feasibility.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The OPAs of the derivation cohort were acquired using cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) to assess its superiority for depicting LAA depth versus traditional working angles (TAs) of RAO 30°, CAU 20°. The practicability of OPA-guided LAAC was demonstrated by comparison between clinical data from the validation cohort and those from a propensity-score matched (PSM) control group, as well as randomized controlled studies investigating LAAC.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 705 patients in the derivation cohort, the median OPA was RAO 46°, CAU 31°. Compared with TA, the OPA depicted a longer mean (±SD) LAA depth (5.1 ± 4.4) mm and a larger orifice diameter (1.1 ± 1.1 mm), (P &lt; 0.0001 for both). All 38 OPA-guided LAACs were successful, with a shorter mean procedure duration (42.9 ± 12.3 min versus [vs.] 107.2 ± 41.5 min; P &lt; 0.0001) and reduced device consumption (1.08 vs. 1.5 per case), compared with the PSM control group. At the 3-month follow-up, the incidence of peri-device leak was 52.6% (20/38) detected by CCTA, with a mean leakage of 1.6 ± 0.8 mm.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>By unfolding the LAA depth and orifice diameter for a better view, OPA demonstrated the potential to optimize LAAC procedural efficiency, although further larger-scale studies are required to confirm this.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hellenic Journal of Cardiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1109966623001793/pdfft?md5=86a89c29f25632e2842899cd3a3c3626&pid=1-s2.0-S1109966623001793-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hellenic Journal of Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1109966623001793\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hellenic Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1109966623001793","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:左心耳(LAA)闭合(LAAC)手术通常使用经验透视视角进行。然而,由于左心耳是一个高度可变的解剖结构,这些角度无法描述处于最佳位置的左心耳。本研究旨在评估使用新型最佳荧光透视投影角(OPA)进行左心房颤动的效率,并验证其可行性。方法:使用心脏计算机断层摄影血管造影术(CCTA)获取衍生队列的OPA,以评估其在描绘左心耳深度方面的优越性,而传统的工作角度(TAs)为RAO 30°,CAU 20°。通过比较验证队列和倾向评分匹配(PSM)对照组的临床数据,以及调查LAAC的随机对照研究,证明了OPA引导的LAAC的实用性。结果:在衍生队列的705名患者中,中位OPA为RAO 46°,CAU 31°。与TA相比,OPA显示出更长的平均(±SD)左心耳深度(5.1±4.4)mm和更大的孔口直径(1.1±1.1 mm)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficiency of optimal fluoroscopic projection angle defined by computed tomography angiography for left atrial appendage closure

Background

Left atrial appendage (LAA) closure (LAAC) procedures are conventionally performed using empirical fluoroscopic viewing angles. However, because the LAA is a highly variable anatomical structure, these angles cannot depict the LAA in the optimal position. The present study aimed to assess the efficiency of using a novel optimal fluoroscopic projection angle (OPA) for LAAC and to validate its feasibility.

Methods

The OPAs of the derivation cohort were acquired using cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) to assess its superiority for depicting LAA depth versus traditional working angles (TAs) of RAO 30°, CAU 20°. The practicability of OPA-guided LAAC was demonstrated by comparison between clinical data from the validation cohort and those from a propensity-score matched (PSM) control group, as well as randomized controlled studies investigating LAAC.

Results

Of 705 patients in the derivation cohort, the median OPA was RAO 46°, CAU 31°. Compared with TA, the OPA depicted a longer mean (±SD) LAA depth (5.1 ± 4.4) mm and a larger orifice diameter (1.1 ± 1.1 mm), (P < 0.0001 for both). All 38 OPA-guided LAACs were successful, with a shorter mean procedure duration (42.9 ± 12.3 min versus [vs.] 107.2 ± 41.5 min; P < 0.0001) and reduced device consumption (1.08 vs. 1.5 per case), compared with the PSM control group. At the 3-month follow-up, the incidence of peri-device leak was 52.6% (20/38) detected by CCTA, with a mean leakage of 1.6 ± 0.8 mm.

Conclusion

By unfolding the LAA depth and orifice diameter for a better view, OPA demonstrated the potential to optimize LAAC procedural efficiency, although further larger-scale studies are required to confirm this.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hellenic Journal of Cardiology
Hellenic Journal of Cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
7.30%
发文量
86
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The Hellenic Journal of Cardiology (International Edition, ISSN 1109-9666) is the official journal of the Hellenic Society of Cardiology and aims to publish high-quality articles on all aspects of cardiovascular medicine. A primary goal is to publish in each issue a number of original articles related to clinical and basic research. Many of these will be accompanied by invited editorial comments. Hot topics, such as molecular cardiology, and innovative cardiac imaging and electrophysiological mapping techniques, will appear frequently in the journal in the form of invited expert articles or special reports. The Editorial Committee also attaches great importance to subjects related to continuing medical education, the implementation of guidelines and cost effectiveness in cardiology.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of continuous flow centrifugal left ventricular assist devices as a bridge to transplant strategy in a low organ donation environment: Single center experience. Impact of three-month treatment with pitavastatin on arterial stiffness in patients with hypercholesterolemia: a prospective observational study. Multimodality imaging for the diagnosis of giant cavernous hemangioma of the right ventricle. Comparing the predictive ability of GRACE 2.0 and GRACE 3.0 scores in a Greek cohort of patients hospitalized with acute coronary syndrome. New guidelines of EACTS/STS on aortic disease: A useful tool for the management of "aortic organ" disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1