{"title":"对卫生保健专业人员的虚拟正念培训的评估:改善自我报告的呼吸率、感知压力和恢复力。","authors":"Justin J Merrigan, Catherine Quatman-Yates, Jacqueline Caputo, Kayla Daniel, Nadia Briones, Ilayda Sen, Slate Bretz, Anne-Marie Duchemin, Beth Steinberg, Joshua A Hagen, Maryanna Klatt","doi":"10.1177/27536130231187636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mindfulness in Motion (MIM) is a workplace resilience-building intervention that has shown reductions in perceived stress and burnout, as well as increased resilience and work engagement in health care workers.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate effects of MIM delivered in a synchronous virtual format on self-reported respiratory rates (RR), as well as perceived stress and resiliency of health care workers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Breath counts were self-reported by 275 participants before and after 8 weekly MIM sessions. MIM was delivered virtually in a group format as a structured, evidence-based workplace intervention including a variety of mindfulness, relaxation, and resilience-building techniques. Participants counted their breaths for 30 seconds, which was then multiplied by 2 to report RR. Additionally, participants completed Perceived Stress Scale and Connor-Davidson Resiliency Scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>According to mixed effect analyses there were main effects of MIM Session (P < .001) and Weeks (P < .001), but no Session by Week interaction (P = .489) on RR. On average, RR prior to MIM sessions were reduced from 13.24 bpm (95% CI = 12.94, 13.55 bpm) to 9.69 bpm (95% CI = 9.39, 9.99 bpm). When comparing average Pre-MIM and Post-MIM RR throughout the MIM intervention, Week-2 (mean = 12.34; 95% CI = 11.89, 12.79 bpm) was not significantly different than Week-1 (mean = 12.78; 95% CI = 12.34, 13.23 bpm), but Week-3 through Week-8 demonstrated significantly lower average Pre-MIM and Post-MIM RR compared to Week-1 (average weekly difference range: 1.36 to 2.48 bpm, P < .05). Perceived stress was reduced from Week-1 (17.52 ± 6.25) to after Week-8 (13.52 ± 6.04; P < .001), while perceived resiliency was increased from Week-1 (11.30 ± 5.14) to after Week-8 (19.29 ± 2.58); P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Thus far, completion of MIM sessions has shown acute and long-term effects on self-reported RR, but more research is required to determine the extent of improved parasympathetic (relaxed) states. Collectively, this work has shown value for mind-body stress mitigation and resiliency-building in high stress acute health care environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":73159,"journal":{"name":"Global advances in integrative medicine and health","volume":"12 ","pages":"27536130231187636"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/89/ae/10.1177_27536130231187636.PMC10331219.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Virtual Mindfulness-Based Training for Health Care Professionals: Improved Self-Reported Respiration Rates, Perceived Stress, and Resilience.\",\"authors\":\"Justin J Merrigan, Catherine Quatman-Yates, Jacqueline Caputo, Kayla Daniel, Nadia Briones, Ilayda Sen, Slate Bretz, Anne-Marie Duchemin, Beth Steinberg, Joshua A Hagen, Maryanna Klatt\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/27536130231187636\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mindfulness in Motion (MIM) is a workplace resilience-building intervention that has shown reductions in perceived stress and burnout, as well as increased resilience and work engagement in health care workers.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate effects of MIM delivered in a synchronous virtual format on self-reported respiratory rates (RR), as well as perceived stress and resiliency of health care workers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Breath counts were self-reported by 275 participants before and after 8 weekly MIM sessions. MIM was delivered virtually in a group format as a structured, evidence-based workplace intervention including a variety of mindfulness, relaxation, and resilience-building techniques. Participants counted their breaths for 30 seconds, which was then multiplied by 2 to report RR. Additionally, participants completed Perceived Stress Scale and Connor-Davidson Resiliency Scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>According to mixed effect analyses there were main effects of MIM Session (P < .001) and Weeks (P < .001), but no Session by Week interaction (P = .489) on RR. On average, RR prior to MIM sessions were reduced from 13.24 bpm (95% CI = 12.94, 13.55 bpm) to 9.69 bpm (95% CI = 9.39, 9.99 bpm). When comparing average Pre-MIM and Post-MIM RR throughout the MIM intervention, Week-2 (mean = 12.34; 95% CI = 11.89, 12.79 bpm) was not significantly different than Week-1 (mean = 12.78; 95% CI = 12.34, 13.23 bpm), but Week-3 through Week-8 demonstrated significantly lower average Pre-MIM and Post-MIM RR compared to Week-1 (average weekly difference range: 1.36 to 2.48 bpm, P < .05). Perceived stress was reduced from Week-1 (17.52 ± 6.25) to after Week-8 (13.52 ± 6.04; P < .001), while perceived resiliency was increased from Week-1 (11.30 ± 5.14) to after Week-8 (19.29 ± 2.58); P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Thus far, completion of MIM sessions has shown acute and long-term effects on self-reported RR, but more research is required to determine the extent of improved parasympathetic (relaxed) states. Collectively, this work has shown value for mind-body stress mitigation and resiliency-building in high stress acute health care environments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global advances in integrative medicine and health\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"27536130231187636\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/89/ae/10.1177_27536130231187636.PMC10331219.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global advances in integrative medicine and health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/27536130231187636\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global advances in integrative medicine and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27536130231187636","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:运动中的正念(MIM)是一种工作场所复原力建设干预措施,可以减少感知到的压力和倦怠,并增加卫生保健工作者的复原力和工作投入。目的:评估以同步虚拟形式提供的MIM对医护人员自我报告呼吸频率(RR)、感知压力和恢复力的影响。方法:275名参与者在8周MIM课程前后自我报告呼吸计数。MIM实际上是以小组形式进行的,作为一种结构化的、基于证据的工作场所干预,包括各种正念、放松和恢复力建设技术。参与者数自己的呼吸30秒,然后乘以2来报告呼吸率。此外,参与者还完成了感知压力量表和康纳-戴维森弹性量表。结果:根据混合效应分析,MIM疗程(P < .001)和周(P < .001)对RR有主要影响,但周与疗程之间无交互作用(P = .489)。平均而言,MIM治疗前的RR从13.24 bpm (95% CI = 12.94, 13.55 bpm)降低到9.69 bpm (95% CI = 9.39, 9.99 bpm)。当比较整个MIM干预期间MIM前和MIM后的平均RR时,第2周(平均值= 12.34;95% CI = 11.89, 12.79 bpm)与第1周比较差异无统计学意义(平均值= 12.78;95% CI = 12.34, 13.23 bpm),但与第1周相比,第3周至第8周的平均mim前和mim后RR显着降低(平均周差异范围:1.36至2.48 bpm, P < 0.05)。知觉应激从第1周(17.52±6.25)降低到第8周(13.52±6.04);P < 0.001),而知觉弹性从第1周(11.30±5.14)增加到第8周(19.29±2.58);P < 0.001)。结论:到目前为止,MIM课程的完成已经显示出对自我报告的RR的急性和长期影响,但需要更多的研究来确定副交感神经(放松)状态改善的程度。总的来说,这项工作显示了在高压力急性医疗保健环境中身心压力缓解和弹性建设的价值。
Assessment of Virtual Mindfulness-Based Training for Health Care Professionals: Improved Self-Reported Respiration Rates, Perceived Stress, and Resilience.
Background: Mindfulness in Motion (MIM) is a workplace resilience-building intervention that has shown reductions in perceived stress and burnout, as well as increased resilience and work engagement in health care workers.
Objective: To evaluate effects of MIM delivered in a synchronous virtual format on self-reported respiratory rates (RR), as well as perceived stress and resiliency of health care workers.
Methods: Breath counts were self-reported by 275 participants before and after 8 weekly MIM sessions. MIM was delivered virtually in a group format as a structured, evidence-based workplace intervention including a variety of mindfulness, relaxation, and resilience-building techniques. Participants counted their breaths for 30 seconds, which was then multiplied by 2 to report RR. Additionally, participants completed Perceived Stress Scale and Connor-Davidson Resiliency Scale.
Results: According to mixed effect analyses there were main effects of MIM Session (P < .001) and Weeks (P < .001), but no Session by Week interaction (P = .489) on RR. On average, RR prior to MIM sessions were reduced from 13.24 bpm (95% CI = 12.94, 13.55 bpm) to 9.69 bpm (95% CI = 9.39, 9.99 bpm). When comparing average Pre-MIM and Post-MIM RR throughout the MIM intervention, Week-2 (mean = 12.34; 95% CI = 11.89, 12.79 bpm) was not significantly different than Week-1 (mean = 12.78; 95% CI = 12.34, 13.23 bpm), but Week-3 through Week-8 demonstrated significantly lower average Pre-MIM and Post-MIM RR compared to Week-1 (average weekly difference range: 1.36 to 2.48 bpm, P < .05). Perceived stress was reduced from Week-1 (17.52 ± 6.25) to after Week-8 (13.52 ± 6.04; P < .001), while perceived resiliency was increased from Week-1 (11.30 ± 5.14) to after Week-8 (19.29 ± 2.58); P < .001).
Conclusion: Thus far, completion of MIM sessions has shown acute and long-term effects on self-reported RR, but more research is required to determine the extent of improved parasympathetic (relaxed) states. Collectively, this work has shown value for mind-body stress mitigation and resiliency-building in high stress acute health care environments.