{"title":"无尾两栖动物皮质骨形态的多样性","authors":"Yoshiaki Kondo, Rina Iwamoto, Takumi Takahashi, Kaito Suganuma, Hideaki Kato, Hiroaki Nakamura, Akira Yukita","doi":"10.1111/dgd.12831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The cortical bones of mammals, birds, and reptiles are composed of a complex of woven bone and lamellar bone (fibrolamellar bone) organized into a variety of different patterns; however, it remains unclear whether amphibians possess similar structures. Importantly, to understand the evolutionary process of limb bones in tetrapods, it is necessary to compare the bone structure of amphibians (aquatic to terrestrial) with that of amniotes (mostly terrestrial). Therefore, this study compared the cortical bones in the long bones of several frog species before and after metamorphosis. Using micro-computed tomography (CT), we found that the cortical bones in the fibrolamellar bone of <i>Xenopus tropicalis</i> (Pipoidea superfamily) and <i>Lithobates catesbeianus</i> (Ranoidea superfamily) froglets are dense, whereas those of <i>Ceratophrys cranwelli</i> (Hyloidea superfamily) are porous. To clarify whether these features are common to their superfamily or sister group, four other frog species were examined. Histochemical analyses revealed porous cortical bones in <i>C. ornata</i> and <i>Lepidobatrachus laevis</i> (belonging to the same family, Ceratophryidae, as <i>C. cranwelli</i>). However, the cortical bones of <i>Dryophytes japonicus</i> (Hylidae, a sister group of Ceratophryidae in the Hyloidea superfamily), <i>Microhyla okinavensis</i> (Microhylidae, independent of the Hyloidea superfamily), and <i>Pleurodeles waltl</i>, a newt as an outgroup of anurans, are dense with no observed cavities. Our findings demonstrate that at least three members of the Ceratophryidae family have porous cortical bones similar to those of reptiles, birds, and mammals, suggesting that the process of fibrolamellar bone formation arose evolutionarily in amphibians and is conserved in the common ancestor of amniotes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50589,"journal":{"name":"Development Growth & Differentiation","volume":"65 1","pages":"16-22"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diversity of cortical bone morphology in anuran amphibians\",\"authors\":\"Yoshiaki Kondo, Rina Iwamoto, Takumi Takahashi, Kaito Suganuma, Hideaki Kato, Hiroaki Nakamura, Akira Yukita\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/dgd.12831\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The cortical bones of mammals, birds, and reptiles are composed of a complex of woven bone and lamellar bone (fibrolamellar bone) organized into a variety of different patterns; however, it remains unclear whether amphibians possess similar structures. Importantly, to understand the evolutionary process of limb bones in tetrapods, it is necessary to compare the bone structure of amphibians (aquatic to terrestrial) with that of amniotes (mostly terrestrial). Therefore, this study compared the cortical bones in the long bones of several frog species before and after metamorphosis. Using micro-computed tomography (CT), we found that the cortical bones in the fibrolamellar bone of <i>Xenopus tropicalis</i> (Pipoidea superfamily) and <i>Lithobates catesbeianus</i> (Ranoidea superfamily) froglets are dense, whereas those of <i>Ceratophrys cranwelli</i> (Hyloidea superfamily) are porous. To clarify whether these features are common to their superfamily or sister group, four other frog species were examined. Histochemical analyses revealed porous cortical bones in <i>C. ornata</i> and <i>Lepidobatrachus laevis</i> (belonging to the same family, Ceratophryidae, as <i>C. cranwelli</i>). However, the cortical bones of <i>Dryophytes japonicus</i> (Hylidae, a sister group of Ceratophryidae in the Hyloidea superfamily), <i>Microhyla okinavensis</i> (Microhylidae, independent of the Hyloidea superfamily), and <i>Pleurodeles waltl</i>, a newt as an outgroup of anurans, are dense with no observed cavities. Our findings demonstrate that at least three members of the Ceratophryidae family have porous cortical bones similar to those of reptiles, birds, and mammals, suggesting that the process of fibrolamellar bone formation arose evolutionarily in amphibians and is conserved in the common ancestor of amniotes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50589,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Development Growth & Differentiation\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"16-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Development Growth & Differentiation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dgd.12831\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development Growth & Differentiation","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dgd.12831","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Diversity of cortical bone morphology in anuran amphibians
The cortical bones of mammals, birds, and reptiles are composed of a complex of woven bone and lamellar bone (fibrolamellar bone) organized into a variety of different patterns; however, it remains unclear whether amphibians possess similar structures. Importantly, to understand the evolutionary process of limb bones in tetrapods, it is necessary to compare the bone structure of amphibians (aquatic to terrestrial) with that of amniotes (mostly terrestrial). Therefore, this study compared the cortical bones in the long bones of several frog species before and after metamorphosis. Using micro-computed tomography (CT), we found that the cortical bones in the fibrolamellar bone of Xenopus tropicalis (Pipoidea superfamily) and Lithobates catesbeianus (Ranoidea superfamily) froglets are dense, whereas those of Ceratophrys cranwelli (Hyloidea superfamily) are porous. To clarify whether these features are common to their superfamily or sister group, four other frog species were examined. Histochemical analyses revealed porous cortical bones in C. ornata and Lepidobatrachus laevis (belonging to the same family, Ceratophryidae, as C. cranwelli). However, the cortical bones of Dryophytes japonicus (Hylidae, a sister group of Ceratophryidae in the Hyloidea superfamily), Microhyla okinavensis (Microhylidae, independent of the Hyloidea superfamily), and Pleurodeles waltl, a newt as an outgroup of anurans, are dense with no observed cavities. Our findings demonstrate that at least three members of the Ceratophryidae family have porous cortical bones similar to those of reptiles, birds, and mammals, suggesting that the process of fibrolamellar bone formation arose evolutionarily in amphibians and is conserved in the common ancestor of amniotes.
期刊介绍:
Development Growth & Differentiation (DGD) publishes three types of articles: original, resource, and review papers.
Original papers are on any subjects having a context in development, growth, and differentiation processes in animals, plants, and microorganisms, dealing with molecular, genetic, cellular and organismal phenomena including metamorphosis and regeneration, while using experimental, theoretical, and bioinformatic approaches. Papers on other related fields are also welcome, such as stem cell biology, genomics, neuroscience, Evodevo, Ecodevo, and medical science as well as related methodology (new or revised techniques) and bioresources.
Resource papers describe a dataset, such as whole genome sequences and expressed sequence tags (ESTs), with some biological insights, which should be valuable for studying the subjects as mentioned above.
Submission of review papers is also encouraged, especially those providing a new scope based on the authors’ own study, or a summarization of their study series.