新冠肺炎期间亲社会和信任的稳定性:来自荷兰的小组数据。

IF 1.9 4区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Empirica Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1007/s10663-022-09557-6
Hamza Umer
{"title":"新冠肺炎期间亲社会和信任的稳定性:来自荷兰的小组数据。","authors":"Hamza Umer","doi":"10.1007/s10663-022-09557-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Covid-19 has impacted most spheres of life and continues to influence the future course of socio-economic decisions. The effects of pandemic and virus contraction on the stability of social preferences are however relatively less know. This study examines the effects of the Covid-19 on pro-sociality and general trust by using the LISS panel data (time frame: 2019-2020) from the Netherlands. The fixed effects panel regressions show that pro-social behavior and general trust do not differ pre-and-after the Covid-19. The article further analyzes the stability of pro-sociality and general trust among people who unfortunately contracted the Covid-19 virus and the uninfected ones (time frame: 2019-2020) using difference-in-differences (DD) method to infer a causal effect of infections on preferences. The DD analysis also leads to insignificant causal effect of virus contractions on pro-sociality and trust. However, the sub-group analysis shows a positive causal impact of infections on trust for respondents above 60 years. Overall, both fixed effects regressions and DD analysis suggest that pro-sociality and to a large extent general trust in the Netherlands are stable despite the negative Covid-19 shock.</p>","PeriodicalId":46526,"journal":{"name":"Empirica","volume":"50 1","pages":"255-287"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9838336/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stability of pro-sociality and trust amid the Covid-19: panel data from the Netherlands.\",\"authors\":\"Hamza Umer\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10663-022-09557-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Covid-19 has impacted most spheres of life and continues to influence the future course of socio-economic decisions. The effects of pandemic and virus contraction on the stability of social preferences are however relatively less know. This study examines the effects of the Covid-19 on pro-sociality and general trust by using the LISS panel data (time frame: 2019-2020) from the Netherlands. The fixed effects panel regressions show that pro-social behavior and general trust do not differ pre-and-after the Covid-19. The article further analyzes the stability of pro-sociality and general trust among people who unfortunately contracted the Covid-19 virus and the uninfected ones (time frame: 2019-2020) using difference-in-differences (DD) method to infer a causal effect of infections on preferences. The DD analysis also leads to insignificant causal effect of virus contractions on pro-sociality and trust. However, the sub-group analysis shows a positive causal impact of infections on trust for respondents above 60 years. Overall, both fixed effects regressions and DD analysis suggest that pro-sociality and to a large extent general trust in the Netherlands are stable despite the negative Covid-19 shock.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46526,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Empirica\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"255-287\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9838336/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Empirica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-022-09557-6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Empirica","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-022-09557-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

2019冠状病毒病已经影响到生活的大多数领域,并将继续影响未来社会经济决策的进程。然而,人们对大流行和病毒收缩对社会偏好稳定性的影响知之甚少。本研究通过使用来自荷兰的LISS面板数据(时间框架:2019-2020),研究了Covid-19对亲社会性和一般信任的影响。固定效应面板回归显示,疫情前后亲社会行为和总体信任没有差异。本文进一步分析了不幸感染Covid-19病毒的人和未感染的人(时间框架:2019-2020年)的亲社会性和一般信任的稳定性,使用差异中的差异(DD)方法来推断感染对偏好的因果影响。DD分析也表明病毒收缩对亲社会性和信任的因果影响不显著。然而,亚组分析显示,对于60岁以上的受访者来说,感染对信任有积极的因果影响。总体而言,固定效应回归和DD分析都表明,尽管受到新冠肺炎的负面冲击,但荷兰的亲社会性和在很大程度上的普遍信任是稳定的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Stability of pro-sociality and trust amid the Covid-19: panel data from the Netherlands.

The Covid-19 has impacted most spheres of life and continues to influence the future course of socio-economic decisions. The effects of pandemic and virus contraction on the stability of social preferences are however relatively less know. This study examines the effects of the Covid-19 on pro-sociality and general trust by using the LISS panel data (time frame: 2019-2020) from the Netherlands. The fixed effects panel regressions show that pro-social behavior and general trust do not differ pre-and-after the Covid-19. The article further analyzes the stability of pro-sociality and general trust among people who unfortunately contracted the Covid-19 virus and the uninfected ones (time frame: 2019-2020) using difference-in-differences (DD) method to infer a causal effect of infections on preferences. The DD analysis also leads to insignificant causal effect of virus contractions on pro-sociality and trust. However, the sub-group analysis shows a positive causal impact of infections on trust for respondents above 60 years. Overall, both fixed effects regressions and DD analysis suggest that pro-sociality and to a large extent general trust in the Netherlands are stable despite the negative Covid-19 shock.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Empirica
Empirica ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Empirica is a peer-reviewed journal, which publishes original research of general interest to an international audience. Authors are invited to submit empirical papers in all areas of economics with a particular focus on European economies. Per January 2021, the editors also solicit descriptive papers on current or unexplored topics. Founded in 1974, Empirica is the official journal of the Nationalökonomische Gesellschaft (Austrian Economic Association) and is published in cooperation with Austrian Institute of Economic Research (WIFO). The journal aims at a wide international audience and invites submissions from economists around the world. Officially cited as: Empirica
期刊最新文献
Testing PPP hypothesis under considerations of nonlinear and asymmetric adjustments: new international evidence The varying impact of COVID-19 in the Spanish Labor Market Intergroup cooperation in the lab: asymmetric power relations and redistributive policies Labor market outcomes during opposite resource shocks: the 2009 and 2012 earthquakes in Italy Optimal fiscal policy in times of uncertainty: a stochastic control approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1