通过药剂师教育和订购耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌鼻拭子,实现肺炎抗生素降级。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice Pub Date : 2024-06-21 DOI:10.1136/ejhpharm-2022-003504
Kevin Doan, Steven Smoke
{"title":"通过药剂师教育和订购耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌鼻拭子,实现肺炎抗生素降级。","authors":"Kevin Doan, Steven Smoke","doi":"10.1136/ejhpharm-2022-003504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>When methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MRSA) is the causative pathogen in pneumonia, in-hospital mortality rate is approximately 31.2%. However, the occurrence of MRSA pneumonia is uncommon, with a reported incidence of approximately 4.2%. Vancomycin is often empirically used for MRSA pneumonia coverage, but can lead to serious harm. The purpose of this study was to measure the impact of a pharmacy-driven MRSA nares testing protocol on vancomycin and linezolid prescribing patterns and clinical outcomes in patients diagnosed with pneumonia after removal of immediate educational intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-centre, quasi-experimental study evaluated the use of a MRSA nasal swab on patients diagnosed with community-acquired pneumonia, hospital-acquired pneumonia and ventilator-associated pneumonia. This study consisted of three phases, the preimplementation phase, the active/educational phase and the postimplementation phase. The primary outcome was intravenous anti-MRSA antibiotic duration of therapy. Secondary outcomes included the occurrence of acute kidney injury, duration of hospital stay, number of vancomycin levels obtained, the number of MRSA nares swabs ordered and time points in the MRSA nares collection process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The preimplementation phase (n=39), the active phase (n=45) and the postimplementation phase (n=26) demonstrated similar baseline characteristics. The primary outcome for duration of anti-MRSA therapy 0-72 hours was 61.5% vs 77.8% vs 76.9% (p=0.19). Acute kidney injury was decreased throughout the study at 25.6%, 24.4% and 16.7% (p=0.32). The number of MRSA nares swabs ordered were 23.1%, 60% and 30.8% in each of the phases, respectively (p=0.49).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our novel approach to measuring the impact of pharmacist education and ordering of MRSA nasal swabs has demonstrated benefits that were sustained for a short period after the intervention was removed. Additional study is required to determine the long-term impact.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The implementation of a hospital-wide anti-MRSA protocol in patients with confirmed or suspected pneumonia indicated sustained changes for at least 3 months after direct intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":12050,"journal":{"name":"European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice","volume":" ","pages":"327-331"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11265549/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antibiotic de-escalation in pneumonia with pharmacist education and ordering of methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> nasal swabs.\",\"authors\":\"Kevin Doan, Steven Smoke\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/ejhpharm-2022-003504\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>When methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MRSA) is the causative pathogen in pneumonia, in-hospital mortality rate is approximately 31.2%. However, the occurrence of MRSA pneumonia is uncommon, with a reported incidence of approximately 4.2%. Vancomycin is often empirically used for MRSA pneumonia coverage, but can lead to serious harm. The purpose of this study was to measure the impact of a pharmacy-driven MRSA nares testing protocol on vancomycin and linezolid prescribing patterns and clinical outcomes in patients diagnosed with pneumonia after removal of immediate educational intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-centre, quasi-experimental study evaluated the use of a MRSA nasal swab on patients diagnosed with community-acquired pneumonia, hospital-acquired pneumonia and ventilator-associated pneumonia. This study consisted of three phases, the preimplementation phase, the active/educational phase and the postimplementation phase. The primary outcome was intravenous anti-MRSA antibiotic duration of therapy. Secondary outcomes included the occurrence of acute kidney injury, duration of hospital stay, number of vancomycin levels obtained, the number of MRSA nares swabs ordered and time points in the MRSA nares collection process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The preimplementation phase (n=39), the active phase (n=45) and the postimplementation phase (n=26) demonstrated similar baseline characteristics. The primary outcome for duration of anti-MRSA therapy 0-72 hours was 61.5% vs 77.8% vs 76.9% (p=0.19). Acute kidney injury was decreased throughout the study at 25.6%, 24.4% and 16.7% (p=0.32). The number of MRSA nares swabs ordered were 23.1%, 60% and 30.8% in each of the phases, respectively (p=0.49).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our novel approach to measuring the impact of pharmacist education and ordering of MRSA nasal swabs has demonstrated benefits that were sustained for a short period after the intervention was removed. Additional study is required to determine the long-term impact.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The implementation of a hospital-wide anti-MRSA protocol in patients with confirmed or suspected pneumonia indicated sustained changes for at least 3 months after direct intervention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12050,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"327-331\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11265549/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/ejhpharm-2022-003504\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ejhpharm-2022-003504","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)是肺炎的致病菌:如果耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)是肺炎的致病菌,院内死亡率约为 31.2%。然而,MRSA 肺炎并不常见,据报道发病率约为 4.2%。万古霉素通常用于 MRSA 肺炎的经验性治疗,但可能导致严重的危害。本研究旨在衡量药房主导的 MRSA 鼻腔检测方案对万古霉素和利奈唑胺处方模式的影响,以及取消即时教育干预后确诊为肺炎患者的临床结果:这项单中心准实验研究评估了 MRSA 鼻拭子对社区获得性肺炎、医院获得性肺炎和呼吸机相关肺炎患者的使用情况。该研究包括三个阶段:实施前阶段、积极/教育阶段和实施后阶段。主要结果是静脉注射抗 MRSA 抗生素的疗程。次要结果包括急性肾损伤发生率、住院时间、获得的万古霉素水平数量、订购的 MRSA 鼻拭子数量以及 MRSA 鼻拭子采集过程中的时间点:结果:实施前阶段(39 人)、积极阶段(45 人)和实施后阶段(26 人)的基线特征相似。抗 MRSA 治疗持续时间为 0-72 小时的主要结果为 61.5% vs 77.8% vs 76.9%(P=0.19)。在整个研究过程中,急性肾损伤的发生率有所下降,分别为 25.6%、24.4% 和 16.7%(P=0.32)。在每个阶段,MRSA鼻拭子的使用率分别为23.1%、60%和30.8%(P=0.49):讨论:我们采用了新颖的方法来衡量药剂师教育和订购 MRSA 鼻拭子的影响,结果表明,在取消干预措施后的短时间内,效果仍能保持。要确定其长期影响,还需要进行更多的研究:结论:在全院范围内对确诊或疑似肺炎患者实施抗 MRSA 方案表明,在直接干预后的至少 3 个月内,情况会发生持续变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Antibiotic de-escalation in pneumonia with pharmacist education and ordering of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nasal swabs.

Introduction: When methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is the causative pathogen in pneumonia, in-hospital mortality rate is approximately 31.2%. However, the occurrence of MRSA pneumonia is uncommon, with a reported incidence of approximately 4.2%. Vancomycin is often empirically used for MRSA pneumonia coverage, but can lead to serious harm. The purpose of this study was to measure the impact of a pharmacy-driven MRSA nares testing protocol on vancomycin and linezolid prescribing patterns and clinical outcomes in patients diagnosed with pneumonia after removal of immediate educational intervention.

Methods: This single-centre, quasi-experimental study evaluated the use of a MRSA nasal swab on patients diagnosed with community-acquired pneumonia, hospital-acquired pneumonia and ventilator-associated pneumonia. This study consisted of three phases, the preimplementation phase, the active/educational phase and the postimplementation phase. The primary outcome was intravenous anti-MRSA antibiotic duration of therapy. Secondary outcomes included the occurrence of acute kidney injury, duration of hospital stay, number of vancomycin levels obtained, the number of MRSA nares swabs ordered and time points in the MRSA nares collection process.

Results: The preimplementation phase (n=39), the active phase (n=45) and the postimplementation phase (n=26) demonstrated similar baseline characteristics. The primary outcome for duration of anti-MRSA therapy 0-72 hours was 61.5% vs 77.8% vs 76.9% (p=0.19). Acute kidney injury was decreased throughout the study at 25.6%, 24.4% and 16.7% (p=0.32). The number of MRSA nares swabs ordered were 23.1%, 60% and 30.8% in each of the phases, respectively (p=0.49).

Discussion: Our novel approach to measuring the impact of pharmacist education and ordering of MRSA nasal swabs has demonstrated benefits that were sustained for a short period after the intervention was removed. Additional study is required to determine the long-term impact.

Conclusion: The implementation of a hospital-wide anti-MRSA protocol in patients with confirmed or suspected pneumonia indicated sustained changes for at least 3 months after direct intervention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
104
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy (EJHP) offers a high quality, peer-reviewed platform for the publication of practical and innovative research which aims to strengthen the profile and professional status of hospital pharmacists. EJHP is committed to being the leading journal on all aspects of hospital pharmacy, thereby advancing the science, practice and profession of hospital pharmacy. The journal aims to become a major source for education and inspiration to improve practice and the standard of patient care in hospitals and related institutions worldwide. EJHP is the only official journal of the European Association of Hospital Pharmacists.
期刊最新文献
Mobile pharmacies of the Ukrainian chain 'Apteka 9-1-1': access to medicines during the war in Ukraine. Integrating automated dispensing cabinets into the medication dispensing process: feedback from the practice in European hospitals. Cardiovascular events in eGFR-mutation non-small-cell lung cancer patients on osimertinib. Ceftaroline combination therapy for methicillin resistant coagulase negative Staphylococcus bacteraemia and endocarditis. Predictive performance of glomerular filtration rate equations based on cystatin C, creatinine and their combination in critically ill patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1