PD1抑制剂治疗实体瘤患者免疫相关不良反应与生存的关联

IF 0.6 Q4 ONCOLOGY South Asian Journal of Cancer Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0041-1740243
Akhil Kapoor, Vanita Noronha, Vijay M Patil, Amit Joshi, Nandini Menon, Amit Kumar, Abhishek Mahajan, Amit Janu, Rajiv Kumar, Kumar Prabhash
{"title":"PD1抑制剂治疗实体瘤患者免疫相关不良反应与生存的关联","authors":"Akhil Kapoor,&nbsp;Vanita Noronha,&nbsp;Vijay M Patil,&nbsp;Amit Joshi,&nbsp;Nandini Menon,&nbsp;Amit Kumar,&nbsp;Abhishek Mahajan,&nbsp;Amit Janu,&nbsp;Rajiv Kumar,&nbsp;Kumar Prabhash","doi":"10.1055/s-0041-1740243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Kumar Prabhash<b>Background</b>  The development of immune-related adverse effects (irAEs) can corroborate with the response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), including programmed cell death 1 (PD1) inhibitors. However, there is extremely limited data on the association of irAEs with survival in patients who have shown a response to ICIs. <b>Patients and Methods</b>  This study is a retrospective audit of the prospectively collected database of patients who received PD1 inhibitors for advanced solid tumors. Responders were defined as patients who attained the best response of either complete response or partial response. Time-to-event analysis was done using the Kaplan-Meier estimator, and the hazard ratio (HR) was calculated by using Cox proportional model. A point-biserial correlation was used to find out the potential influence of irAEs on overall survival (OS). <b>Results</b>  A total of 155 patients (49% lung cancer, 31% head and neck cancer) who received ICI during the specified period were evaluated for this study. The overall response rate was 19.4% and disease control rate was 43.2%. The median (OS) for patients who developed irAE was 12.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.9-15.6), while it was not reached for patients without irAE (HR: 10.5, 95% CI: 1.2-NR, <i>p</i>  = 0.007). One-year OS for the corresponding group of patients was 53.6% (standard deviation [SD]: 15.6) versus 92.9% (SD: 6.9), respectively. Among responders, 12 (40%) developed at least grade 1 irAE, while among nonresponders, 38 (30.4%) developed irAE ( <i>p</i>  = 0.312). <b>Conclusions</b>  In our study, we found significant improvement in survival of solid tumor patients treated with ICIs who developed irAEs on treatment as compared with those who did not. On specifically analyzing patients who responded to ICIs, there was no difference in OS who developed irAEs versus those who did not. However, this needs to be studied in a larger sample to reach a definite conclusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":22053,"journal":{"name":"South Asian Journal of Cancer","volume":"11 4","pages":"340-345"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a8/24/10-1055-s-0041-1740243.PMC9902094.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of Immune-Related Adverse Effects and Survival in Solid Tumor Patients Treated with PD1 Inhibitors.\",\"authors\":\"Akhil Kapoor,&nbsp;Vanita Noronha,&nbsp;Vijay M Patil,&nbsp;Amit Joshi,&nbsp;Nandini Menon,&nbsp;Amit Kumar,&nbsp;Abhishek Mahajan,&nbsp;Amit Janu,&nbsp;Rajiv Kumar,&nbsp;Kumar Prabhash\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0041-1740243\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Kumar Prabhash<b>Background</b>  The development of immune-related adverse effects (irAEs) can corroborate with the response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), including programmed cell death 1 (PD1) inhibitors. However, there is extremely limited data on the association of irAEs with survival in patients who have shown a response to ICIs. <b>Patients and Methods</b>  This study is a retrospective audit of the prospectively collected database of patients who received PD1 inhibitors for advanced solid tumors. Responders were defined as patients who attained the best response of either complete response or partial response. Time-to-event analysis was done using the Kaplan-Meier estimator, and the hazard ratio (HR) was calculated by using Cox proportional model. A point-biserial correlation was used to find out the potential influence of irAEs on overall survival (OS). <b>Results</b>  A total of 155 patients (49% lung cancer, 31% head and neck cancer) who received ICI during the specified period were evaluated for this study. The overall response rate was 19.4% and disease control rate was 43.2%. The median (OS) for patients who developed irAE was 12.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.9-15.6), while it was not reached for patients without irAE (HR: 10.5, 95% CI: 1.2-NR, <i>p</i>  = 0.007). One-year OS for the corresponding group of patients was 53.6% (standard deviation [SD]: 15.6) versus 92.9% (SD: 6.9), respectively. Among responders, 12 (40%) developed at least grade 1 irAE, while among nonresponders, 38 (30.4%) developed irAE ( <i>p</i>  = 0.312). <b>Conclusions</b>  In our study, we found significant improvement in survival of solid tumor patients treated with ICIs who developed irAEs on treatment as compared with those who did not. On specifically analyzing patients who responded to ICIs, there was no difference in OS who developed irAEs versus those who did not. However, this needs to be studied in a larger sample to reach a definite conclusion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22053,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South Asian Journal of Cancer\",\"volume\":\"11 4\",\"pages\":\"340-345\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a8/24/10-1055-s-0041-1740243.PMC9902094.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South Asian Journal of Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1740243\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South Asian Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1740243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

免疫相关不良反应(irAEs)的发生可以证实免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)的反应,包括程序性细胞死亡1 (PD1)抑制剂。然而,在对ICIs有反应的患者中,关于irae与生存率之间的关系的数据非常有限。患者和方法本研究是对前瞻性收集的接受PD1抑制剂治疗晚期实体瘤患者的数据库进行回顾性审计。应答者被定义为达到完全应答或部分应答的最佳应答的患者。时间-事件分析采用Kaplan-Meier估计量,风险比(HR)采用Cox比例模型计算。采用点双列相关分析来发现irAEs对总生存期(OS)的潜在影响。结果155例患者(49%为肺癌,31%为头颈癌)在规定时间内接受了ICI。总有效率为19.4%,疾病控制率为43.2%。发生irAE的患者的中位(OS)为12.3个月(95%可信区间[CI]: 8.9-15.6),而未发生irAE的患者没有达到中位(OS) (HR: 10.5, 95% CI: 1.2-NR, p = 0.007)。相应组患者的1年OS分别为53.6%(标准差[SD]: 15.6)和92.9% (SD: 6.9)。在应答者中,12例(40%)发生了至少1级的irAE,而在无应答者中,38例(30.4%)发生了irAE (p = 0.312)。在我们的研究中,我们发现接受ICIs治疗的实体瘤患者与未接受ICIs治疗的实体瘤患者相比,在治疗过程中发生irae的生存率有显著提高。在具体分析对ICIs有反应的患者时,发生irAEs的OS与未发生irAEs的OS没有差异。然而,这需要在更大的样本中进行研究才能得出明确的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Association of Immune-Related Adverse Effects and Survival in Solid Tumor Patients Treated with PD1 Inhibitors.

Kumar PrabhashBackground  The development of immune-related adverse effects (irAEs) can corroborate with the response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), including programmed cell death 1 (PD1) inhibitors. However, there is extremely limited data on the association of irAEs with survival in patients who have shown a response to ICIs. Patients and Methods  This study is a retrospective audit of the prospectively collected database of patients who received PD1 inhibitors for advanced solid tumors. Responders were defined as patients who attained the best response of either complete response or partial response. Time-to-event analysis was done using the Kaplan-Meier estimator, and the hazard ratio (HR) was calculated by using Cox proportional model. A point-biserial correlation was used to find out the potential influence of irAEs on overall survival (OS). Results  A total of 155 patients (49% lung cancer, 31% head and neck cancer) who received ICI during the specified period were evaluated for this study. The overall response rate was 19.4% and disease control rate was 43.2%. The median (OS) for patients who developed irAE was 12.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.9-15.6), while it was not reached for patients without irAE (HR: 10.5, 95% CI: 1.2-NR, p  = 0.007). One-year OS for the corresponding group of patients was 53.6% (standard deviation [SD]: 15.6) versus 92.9% (SD: 6.9), respectively. Among responders, 12 (40%) developed at least grade 1 irAE, while among nonresponders, 38 (30.4%) developed irAE ( p  = 0.312). Conclusions  In our study, we found significant improvement in survival of solid tumor patients treated with ICIs who developed irAEs on treatment as compared with those who did not. On specifically analyzing patients who responded to ICIs, there was no difference in OS who developed irAEs versus those who did not. However, this needs to be studied in a larger sample to reach a definite conclusion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
35 weeks
期刊最新文献
Staging and Management of Cervical Cancer at the Colposcopy Clinic of Bangabandhu Sheikh Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Bangladesh. COVID-19 Impact on Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancers at Regional Cancer Centre, Thiruvananthapuram-An Audit. Do Uro-Oncology Day Care Procedures Need to Be Differed during COVID-19 Pandemic?-An Experience from Tertiary Cancer Care Center. Colorectal Origin: A Marker of Favorable Outcome in Krukenberg Tumor? Results from Clinical and Prognostic Analysis. Cytogenetic Alterations and Correlation with Age and Gender in Patients of Multiple Myeloma: A Study from a Tertiary Care Center in Eastern India.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1