资源受限的低收入和中等收入国家(LMICS)转移性结直肠癌治疗的情景结局、实践模式和治疗费用评论

IF 0.6 Q4 ONCOLOGY South Asian Journal of Cancer Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0041-1736203
Anant Ramaswamy, Vasu Babu, Rushabh Kothari, Ram Abhinav, Ashwin Desouza, Pradeep Ventrapati, Amit Kumar, Akhil Kapoor, Shasanka Das, Reena Engineer, Avanish Saklani, Vikas Ostwal
{"title":"资源受限的低收入和中等收入国家(LMICS)转移性结直肠癌治疗的情景结局、实践模式和治疗费用评论","authors":"Anant Ramaswamy,&nbsp;Vasu Babu,&nbsp;Rushabh Kothari,&nbsp;Ram Abhinav,&nbsp;Ashwin Desouza,&nbsp;Pradeep Ventrapati,&nbsp;Amit Kumar,&nbsp;Akhil Kapoor,&nbsp;Shasanka Das,&nbsp;Reena Engineer,&nbsp;Avanish Saklani,&nbsp;Vikas Ostwal","doi":"10.1055/s-0041-1736203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Anant Ramaswamy<b>Introduction</b>  The overall survival (OS) of metastatic colorectal cancers (mCRCs) in clinical practice and resource-constrained low- and middle-income countries (LMICS) like India is not known. <b>Materials and Methods</b>  Data of patients with mCRC treated between January 2013 and August 2017 were accessed from a prospectively maintained database. Demographics, disease characteristics, chemotherapeutic regimens, use of monoclonal antibodies, and survival outcomes in treated patients were collected and analyzed. Costs of treatment options as off 2017 were also interpreted. <b>Results</b>  The data of 403 patients satisfied prespecified inclusion criteria and were included for analysis. The median age of the cohort was 48 years (range: 17-86) with a predominance of rectal cancers (63.3%), liver alone metastases (47.1%), and resected primary (69.7%). Signet ring histology was present in 82 patients (20.3%). The most commonly used first-line regimen (CT1) was modified capecitabine-oxaliplatin (53.3%). Two hundred and nineteen patients (54.3%) received second-line systemic therapy (CT2). Patients received a median of two lines of therapy (range: 1-6). MoAbs were used by 48 patients (13.4%) with CT1 and 34 patients (15.5%) with CT2. Median OS of the entire cohort was 17.61 months (95% confidence interval: 15.48-19.74), which was within the predicted range, as per investigator hypothesis. The presence of signet ring histology ( <i>p</i> <0.001), raised carcinoembryonic antigen at baseline ( <i>p</i> =0.017), and the absence of a resected primary ( <i>p</i> <0.001) predicted inferior median OS. <b>Conclusions</b>  Survival of patients with mCRC in a resource-constrained LMIC scenario like India is approximately 12 to 15 months lower than published trial data. Limited access to targeted therapy and newer expensive treatment options due to financial constraints may contribute to this disparity.</p>","PeriodicalId":22053,"journal":{"name":"South Asian Journal of Cancer","volume":"11 4","pages":"293-298"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5d/dc/10-1055-s-0041-1736203.PMC9902092.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancers in Resource-Constrained Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICS) Scenario-Outcomes, Practice Patterns, and Commentary on Treatment Costs.\",\"authors\":\"Anant Ramaswamy,&nbsp;Vasu Babu,&nbsp;Rushabh Kothari,&nbsp;Ram Abhinav,&nbsp;Ashwin Desouza,&nbsp;Pradeep Ventrapati,&nbsp;Amit Kumar,&nbsp;Akhil Kapoor,&nbsp;Shasanka Das,&nbsp;Reena Engineer,&nbsp;Avanish Saklani,&nbsp;Vikas Ostwal\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0041-1736203\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Anant Ramaswamy<b>Introduction</b>  The overall survival (OS) of metastatic colorectal cancers (mCRCs) in clinical practice and resource-constrained low- and middle-income countries (LMICS) like India is not known. <b>Materials and Methods</b>  Data of patients with mCRC treated between January 2013 and August 2017 were accessed from a prospectively maintained database. Demographics, disease characteristics, chemotherapeutic regimens, use of monoclonal antibodies, and survival outcomes in treated patients were collected and analyzed. Costs of treatment options as off 2017 were also interpreted. <b>Results</b>  The data of 403 patients satisfied prespecified inclusion criteria and were included for analysis. The median age of the cohort was 48 years (range: 17-86) with a predominance of rectal cancers (63.3%), liver alone metastases (47.1%), and resected primary (69.7%). Signet ring histology was present in 82 patients (20.3%). The most commonly used first-line regimen (CT1) was modified capecitabine-oxaliplatin (53.3%). Two hundred and nineteen patients (54.3%) received second-line systemic therapy (CT2). Patients received a median of two lines of therapy (range: 1-6). MoAbs were used by 48 patients (13.4%) with CT1 and 34 patients (15.5%) with CT2. Median OS of the entire cohort was 17.61 months (95% confidence interval: 15.48-19.74), which was within the predicted range, as per investigator hypothesis. The presence of signet ring histology ( <i>p</i> <0.001), raised carcinoembryonic antigen at baseline ( <i>p</i> =0.017), and the absence of a resected primary ( <i>p</i> <0.001) predicted inferior median OS. <b>Conclusions</b>  Survival of patients with mCRC in a resource-constrained LMIC scenario like India is approximately 12 to 15 months lower than published trial data. Limited access to targeted therapy and newer expensive treatment options due to financial constraints may contribute to this disparity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22053,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South Asian Journal of Cancer\",\"volume\":\"11 4\",\"pages\":\"293-298\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5d/dc/10-1055-s-0041-1736203.PMC9902092.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South Asian Journal of Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1736203\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South Asian Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1736203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

转移性结直肠癌(mCRCs)在临床实践和资源受限的中低收入国家(LMICS)(如印度)的总生存期(OS)尚不清楚。材料和方法从前瞻性维护的数据库中获取2013年1月至2017年8月期间接受治疗的mCRC患者的数据。收集和分析治疗患者的人口统计学、疾病特征、化疗方案、单克隆抗体的使用和生存结果。2017年治疗方案的成本也被解释了。结果403例患者资料符合预定纳入标准,纳入分析。该队列的中位年龄为48岁(范围:17-86岁),以直肠癌(63.3%)、肝脏转移(47.1%)和原发性切除(69.7%)为主。印戒组织学有82例(20.3%)。最常用的一线方案(CT1)是改良的卡培他滨-奥沙利铂(53.3%)。219例患者(54.3%)接受了二线全身治疗(CT2)。患者接受的治疗中位数为两条线(范围:1-6)。48例CT1患者(13.4%)和34例CT2患者(15.5%)使用MoAbs。整个队列的中位OS为17.61个月(95%可信区间:15.48 ~ 19.74),在研究者假设的预测范围内。存在印戒组织学(p =0.017),并且没有切除原发灶(p结论:在资源受限的LMIC情况下,如印度,mCRC患者的生存期比已发表的试验数据低约12至15个月。由于财政限制,获得靶向治疗的机会有限和较新的昂贵治疗选择可能导致这种差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancers in Resource-Constrained Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICS) Scenario-Outcomes, Practice Patterns, and Commentary on Treatment Costs.

Anant RamaswamyIntroduction  The overall survival (OS) of metastatic colorectal cancers (mCRCs) in clinical practice and resource-constrained low- and middle-income countries (LMICS) like India is not known. Materials and Methods  Data of patients with mCRC treated between January 2013 and August 2017 were accessed from a prospectively maintained database. Demographics, disease characteristics, chemotherapeutic regimens, use of monoclonal antibodies, and survival outcomes in treated patients were collected and analyzed. Costs of treatment options as off 2017 were also interpreted. Results  The data of 403 patients satisfied prespecified inclusion criteria and were included for analysis. The median age of the cohort was 48 years (range: 17-86) with a predominance of rectal cancers (63.3%), liver alone metastases (47.1%), and resected primary (69.7%). Signet ring histology was present in 82 patients (20.3%). The most commonly used first-line regimen (CT1) was modified capecitabine-oxaliplatin (53.3%). Two hundred and nineteen patients (54.3%) received second-line systemic therapy (CT2). Patients received a median of two lines of therapy (range: 1-6). MoAbs were used by 48 patients (13.4%) with CT1 and 34 patients (15.5%) with CT2. Median OS of the entire cohort was 17.61 months (95% confidence interval: 15.48-19.74), which was within the predicted range, as per investigator hypothesis. The presence of signet ring histology ( p <0.001), raised carcinoembryonic antigen at baseline ( p =0.017), and the absence of a resected primary ( p <0.001) predicted inferior median OS. Conclusions  Survival of patients with mCRC in a resource-constrained LMIC scenario like India is approximately 12 to 15 months lower than published trial data. Limited access to targeted therapy and newer expensive treatment options due to financial constraints may contribute to this disparity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
35 weeks
期刊最新文献
Staging and Management of Cervical Cancer at the Colposcopy Clinic of Bangabandhu Sheikh Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Bangladesh. COVID-19 Impact on Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancers at Regional Cancer Centre, Thiruvananthapuram-An Audit. Do Uro-Oncology Day Care Procedures Need to Be Differed during COVID-19 Pandemic?-An Experience from Tertiary Cancer Care Center. Colorectal Origin: A Marker of Favorable Outcome in Krukenberg Tumor? Results from Clinical and Prognostic Analysis. Cytogenetic Alterations and Correlation with Age and Gender in Patients of Multiple Myeloma: A Study from a Tertiary Care Center in Eastern India.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1