植物驯化过程中非加性基因作用对基因表达变异的影响。

IF 4.1 2区 生物学 Q1 DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY Evodevo Pub Date : 2023-02-10 DOI:10.1186/s13227-022-00206-4
Erik Díaz-Valenzuela, Daniel Hernández-Ríos, Angélica Cibrián-Jaramillo
{"title":"植物驯化过程中非加性基因作用对基因表达变异的影响。","authors":"Erik Díaz-Valenzuela,&nbsp;Daniel Hernández-Ríos,&nbsp;Angélica Cibrián-Jaramillo","doi":"10.1186/s13227-022-00206-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Plant domestication is a remarkable example of rapid phenotypic transformation of polygenic traits, such as organ size. Evidence from a handful of study cases suggests this transformation is due to gene regulatory changes that result in non-additive phenotypes. Employing data from published genetic crosses, we estimated the role of non-additive gene action in the modulation of transcriptional landscapes in three domesticated plants: maize, sunflower, and chili pepper. Using A. thaliana, we assessed the correlation between gene regulatory network (GRN) connectivity properties, transcript abundance variation, and gene action. Finally, we investigated the propagation of non-additive gene action in GRNs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We compared crosses between domesticated plants and their wild relatives to a set of control crosses that included a pair of subspecies evolving under natural selection and a set of inbred lines evolving under domestication. We found abundance differences on a higher portion of transcripts in crosses between domesticated-wild plants relative to the control crosses. These transcripts showed non-additive gene action more often in crosses of domesticated-wild plants than in our control crosses. This pattern was strong for genes associated with cell cycle and cell fate determination, which control organ size. We found weak but significant negative correlations between the number of targets of trans-acting genes (Out-degree) and both the magnitude of transcript abundance difference a well as the absolute degree of dominance. Likewise, we found that the number of regulators that control a gene's expression (In-degree) is weakly but negatively correlated with the magnitude of transcript abundance differences. We observed that dominant-recessive gene action is highly propagable through GRNs. Finally, we found that transgressive gene action is driven by trans-acting regulators showing additive gene action.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study highlights the role of non-additive gene action on modulating domestication-related traits, such as organ size via regulatory divergence. We propose that GRNs are shaped by regulatory changes at genes with modest connectivity, which reduces the effects of antagonistic pleiotropy. Finally, we provide empirical evidence of the propagation of non-additive gene action in GRNs, which suggests a transcriptional epistatic model for the control of polygenic traits, such as organ size.</p>","PeriodicalId":49076,"journal":{"name":"Evodevo","volume":"14 1","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9912502/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of non-additive gene action on gene expression variation in plant domestication.\",\"authors\":\"Erik Díaz-Valenzuela,&nbsp;Daniel Hernández-Ríos,&nbsp;Angélica Cibrián-Jaramillo\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13227-022-00206-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Plant domestication is a remarkable example of rapid phenotypic transformation of polygenic traits, such as organ size. Evidence from a handful of study cases suggests this transformation is due to gene regulatory changes that result in non-additive phenotypes. Employing data from published genetic crosses, we estimated the role of non-additive gene action in the modulation of transcriptional landscapes in three domesticated plants: maize, sunflower, and chili pepper. Using A. thaliana, we assessed the correlation between gene regulatory network (GRN) connectivity properties, transcript abundance variation, and gene action. Finally, we investigated the propagation of non-additive gene action in GRNs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We compared crosses between domesticated plants and their wild relatives to a set of control crosses that included a pair of subspecies evolving under natural selection and a set of inbred lines evolving under domestication. We found abundance differences on a higher portion of transcripts in crosses between domesticated-wild plants relative to the control crosses. These transcripts showed non-additive gene action more often in crosses of domesticated-wild plants than in our control crosses. This pattern was strong for genes associated with cell cycle and cell fate determination, which control organ size. We found weak but significant negative correlations between the number of targets of trans-acting genes (Out-degree) and both the magnitude of transcript abundance difference a well as the absolute degree of dominance. Likewise, we found that the number of regulators that control a gene's expression (In-degree) is weakly but negatively correlated with the magnitude of transcript abundance differences. We observed that dominant-recessive gene action is highly propagable through GRNs. Finally, we found that transgressive gene action is driven by trans-acting regulators showing additive gene action.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study highlights the role of non-additive gene action on modulating domestication-related traits, such as organ size via regulatory divergence. We propose that GRNs are shaped by regulatory changes at genes with modest connectivity, which reduces the effects of antagonistic pleiotropy. Finally, we provide empirical evidence of the propagation of non-additive gene action in GRNs, which suggests a transcriptional epistatic model for the control of polygenic traits, such as organ size.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evodevo\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9912502/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evodevo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13227-022-00206-4\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evodevo","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13227-022-00206-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:植物驯化是多基因性状(如器官大小)快速表型转化的一个显著例子。来自少数研究案例的证据表明,这种转变是由于基因调控变化导致非加性表型。利用已发表的遗传杂交数据,我们估计了三种驯化植物(玉米、向日葵和辣椒)中非加性基因作用在转录景观调节中的作用。以拟南芥为研究对象,研究了基因调控网络(GRN)连通性、转录物丰度变异和基因作用之间的相关性。最后,我们研究了非加性基因作用在grn中的繁殖。结果:我们将驯化植物与其野生近缘的杂交与一组对照杂交进行了比较,其中包括一对在自然选择下进化的亚种和一组在驯化下进化的自交系。结果表明,驯化野生植物与对照植物在较高比例的转录本上存在丰度差异。这些转录本在驯化野生植物杂交中比在对照杂交中更多地表现出非加性基因作用。这种模式对于控制器官大小的细胞周期和细胞命运决定相关的基因是很强的。我们发现反式作用基因的靶数(out度)与转录物丰度差异的大小以及绝对优势度之间存在微弱但显著的负相关。同样,我们发现控制基因表达的调控因子数量(In-degree)与转录物丰度差异的大小呈弱但负相关。我们观察到显性-隐性基因作用通过grn高度可传播。最后,我们发现越界的基因作用是由反式作用的调控因子驱动的,这些调控因子表现出加性的基因作用。结论:我们的研究强调了非加性基因作用在调节驯化相关性状中的作用,如通过调节差异调节器官大小。我们认为grn是由适度连接基因的调控变化形成的,这减少了拮抗多效性的影响。最后,我们提供了非加性基因作用在grn中传播的经验证据,这表明转录上位模型可以控制多基因性状,如器官大小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The role of non-additive gene action on gene expression variation in plant domestication.

Background: Plant domestication is a remarkable example of rapid phenotypic transformation of polygenic traits, such as organ size. Evidence from a handful of study cases suggests this transformation is due to gene regulatory changes that result in non-additive phenotypes. Employing data from published genetic crosses, we estimated the role of non-additive gene action in the modulation of transcriptional landscapes in three domesticated plants: maize, sunflower, and chili pepper. Using A. thaliana, we assessed the correlation between gene regulatory network (GRN) connectivity properties, transcript abundance variation, and gene action. Finally, we investigated the propagation of non-additive gene action in GRNs.

Results: We compared crosses between domesticated plants and their wild relatives to a set of control crosses that included a pair of subspecies evolving under natural selection and a set of inbred lines evolving under domestication. We found abundance differences on a higher portion of transcripts in crosses between domesticated-wild plants relative to the control crosses. These transcripts showed non-additive gene action more often in crosses of domesticated-wild plants than in our control crosses. This pattern was strong for genes associated with cell cycle and cell fate determination, which control organ size. We found weak but significant negative correlations between the number of targets of trans-acting genes (Out-degree) and both the magnitude of transcript abundance difference a well as the absolute degree of dominance. Likewise, we found that the number of regulators that control a gene's expression (In-degree) is weakly but negatively correlated with the magnitude of transcript abundance differences. We observed that dominant-recessive gene action is highly propagable through GRNs. Finally, we found that transgressive gene action is driven by trans-acting regulators showing additive gene action.

Conclusions: Our study highlights the role of non-additive gene action on modulating domestication-related traits, such as organ size via regulatory divergence. We propose that GRNs are shaped by regulatory changes at genes with modest connectivity, which reduces the effects of antagonistic pleiotropy. Finally, we provide empirical evidence of the propagation of non-additive gene action in GRNs, which suggests a transcriptional epistatic model for the control of polygenic traits, such as organ size.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Evodevo
Evodevo EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY-DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: EvoDevo publishes articles on a broad range of topics associated with the translation of genotype to phenotype in a phylogenetic context. Understanding the history of life, the evolution of novelty and the generation of form, whether through embryogenesis, budding, or regeneration are amongst the greatest challenges in biology. We support the understanding of these processes through the many complementary approaches that characterize the field of evo-devo. The focus of the journal is on research that promotes understanding of the pattern and process of morphological evolution. All articles that fulfill this aim will be welcome, in particular: evolution of pattern; formation comparative gene function/expression; life history evolution; homology and character evolution; comparative genomics; phylogenetics and palaeontology
期刊最新文献
Conservation of the dehiscence zone gene regulatory network in dicots and the role of the SEEDSTICK ortholog of California poppy (Eschscholzia californica) in fruit development. The evolution of cephalic fins in manta rays and their relatives: functional evidence for initiation of domain splitting and modulation of the Wnt signaling pathway in the pectoral fin AER of the little skate. Expression of distal limb patterning genes in Hypsibius exemplaris indicate regionalization and suggest distal identity of tardigrade legs. Early embryonic development of the German cockroach Blattella germanica. Periderm fate and independence of tooth formation are conserved across osteichthyans.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1