社会资本是否加强了社会距离?社会资本在大流行病演变过程中的桥梁和纽带作用。

Vincenzo Alfano
{"title":"社会资本是否加强了社会距离?社会资本在大流行病演变过程中的桥梁和纽带作用。","authors":"Vincenzo Alfano","doi":"10.1007/s40888-021-00255-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>By shaping the way people look at members of their networks as well as strangers, social capital affects the behavior of a population during a pandemic. Over the course of 2020, various countries implemented non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPI), imposing restrictions that were difficult to enforce (due to the scale of the policies) in order to protect the public from the threat of COVID-19. This is an interesting quasi-experimental setting in which to test the compliance of populations with different levels of social capital with government suggestions and prescriptions. With the help of European Social Survey data, and the John Hopkins University dataset on the spread of COVID-19 around the world, the present work aims to test the impact within a sample of European countries with different social capital stocks on the spread of coronavirus. The results show that countries with higher social capital have fewer COVID-19 cases, <i>ceteris paribus</i> for NPI. This is especially true if this capital is of the bonding kind.</p>","PeriodicalId":72867,"journal":{"name":"Economia politica (Bologna, Italy)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8791696/pdf/","citationCount":"23","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does social capital enforce social distancing? The role of bridging and bonding social capital in the evolution of the pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"Vincenzo Alfano\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40888-021-00255-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>By shaping the way people look at members of their networks as well as strangers, social capital affects the behavior of a population during a pandemic. Over the course of 2020, various countries implemented non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPI), imposing restrictions that were difficult to enforce (due to the scale of the policies) in order to protect the public from the threat of COVID-19. This is an interesting quasi-experimental setting in which to test the compliance of populations with different levels of social capital with government suggestions and prescriptions. With the help of European Social Survey data, and the John Hopkins University dataset on the spread of COVID-19 around the world, the present work aims to test the impact within a sample of European countries with different social capital stocks on the spread of coronavirus. The results show that countries with higher social capital have fewer COVID-19 cases, <i>ceteris paribus</i> for NPI. This is especially true if this capital is of the bonding kind.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72867,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economia politica (Bologna, Italy)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8791696/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"23\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economia politica (Bologna, Italy)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40888-021-00255-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economia politica (Bologna, Italy)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40888-021-00255-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

摘要

通过塑造人们看待网络成员和陌生人的方式,社会资本在大流行期间影响着人群的行为。在2020年期间,各国实施了非药物干预措施(NPI),实施了难以执行的限制(由于政策的规模),以保护公众免受COVID-19的威胁。这是一个有趣的准实验设置,用来测试不同社会资本水平的人群对政府建议和处方的依从性。借助欧洲社会调查数据和约翰霍普金斯大学关于COVID-19在全球传播的数据集,本研究旨在测试具有不同社会资本存量的欧洲国家样本对冠状病毒传播的影响。结果表明,社会资本越高的国家,新冠肺炎病例越少,其他条件不变。如果这笔资金是债券类型的,情况尤其如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does social capital enforce social distancing? The role of bridging and bonding social capital in the evolution of the pandemic.

By shaping the way people look at members of their networks as well as strangers, social capital affects the behavior of a population during a pandemic. Over the course of 2020, various countries implemented non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPI), imposing restrictions that were difficult to enforce (due to the scale of the policies) in order to protect the public from the threat of COVID-19. This is an interesting quasi-experimental setting in which to test the compliance of populations with different levels of social capital with government suggestions and prescriptions. With the help of European Social Survey data, and the John Hopkins University dataset on the spread of COVID-19 around the world, the present work aims to test the impact within a sample of European countries with different social capital stocks on the spread of coronavirus. The results show that countries with higher social capital have fewer COVID-19 cases, ceteris paribus for NPI. This is especially true if this capital is of the bonding kind.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The impact of labour market shocks on mental health: evidence from the Covid-19 first wave. Does the economic freedom hinder the underground economy? Evidence from a cross-country analysis. Autonomous demand and technical change: exploring the Kaldor-Verdoorn law on a global level. How does home and host-country policy uncertainty affect outward FDI? Firm-level evidence from China. Epidemics and policy: the dismal trade-offs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1