本体感觉神经肌肉促进和肌筋膜释放技术在肩峰下撞击综合征患者中的疗效。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Somatosensory and Motor Research Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.1080/08990220.2021.2018293
Merve Sinem Çelik, Emel Sönmezer, Manolya Acar
{"title":"本体感觉神经肌肉促进和肌筋膜释放技术在肩峰下撞击综合征患者中的疗效。","authors":"Merve Sinem Çelik,&nbsp;Emel Sönmezer,&nbsp;Manolya Acar","doi":"10.1080/08990220.2021.2018293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the effectiveness of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation and myofascial release technique in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome on pain, range of motion, muscle strength, quality of life, functionality and disability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty patients were randomly divided into two groups: proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation group (<i>n</i> = 15) and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation combined with myofascial release technique group (<i>n</i> = 15). Both treatment methods were performed 3 times a week for 4 weeks. Pain severity was assessed by Visuel Analog Scale, range of motion by a goniometer, muscle strength by digital hand dynamometer, quality of life by Nottingham health profile, functionality by arm, shoulder and hand problems questionnaire, disability by shoulder pain and disability index. All measurements were used before and after treatments. Pain severity, range of motion and muscle strength were also evaluated after the first session.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After the treatment, shoulder pain, range of motion, muscle strength, functionality and disability were improved in two groups (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation showed improvement in pain, whereas myofascial release technique improved pain, physical activity, emotional state, sleep and total dimensions of life quality (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation was more effective in reducing activity pain, whereas myofascial release technique was more effective in increasing flexion, external and internal rotation range of motion, flexion and abduction muscle strength after the first session (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The combined application of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation and myofascial release technique has a more acute and cumulative positive effect on pain, range of motion, muscle strength, functionality, disability and quality of life in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome.</p>","PeriodicalId":49498,"journal":{"name":"Somatosensory and Motor Research","volume":"39 2-4","pages":"97-105"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation and myofascial release techniques in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome.\",\"authors\":\"Merve Sinem Çelik,&nbsp;Emel Sönmezer,&nbsp;Manolya Acar\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08990220.2021.2018293\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the effectiveness of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation and myofascial release technique in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome on pain, range of motion, muscle strength, quality of life, functionality and disability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty patients were randomly divided into two groups: proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation group (<i>n</i> = 15) and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation combined with myofascial release technique group (<i>n</i> = 15). Both treatment methods were performed 3 times a week for 4 weeks. Pain severity was assessed by Visuel Analog Scale, range of motion by a goniometer, muscle strength by digital hand dynamometer, quality of life by Nottingham health profile, functionality by arm, shoulder and hand problems questionnaire, disability by shoulder pain and disability index. All measurements were used before and after treatments. Pain severity, range of motion and muscle strength were also evaluated after the first session.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After the treatment, shoulder pain, range of motion, muscle strength, functionality and disability were improved in two groups (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation showed improvement in pain, whereas myofascial release technique improved pain, physical activity, emotional state, sleep and total dimensions of life quality (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation was more effective in reducing activity pain, whereas myofascial release technique was more effective in increasing flexion, external and internal rotation range of motion, flexion and abduction muscle strength after the first session (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The combined application of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation and myofascial release technique has a more acute and cumulative positive effect on pain, range of motion, muscle strength, functionality, disability and quality of life in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49498,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Somatosensory and Motor Research\",\"volume\":\"39 2-4\",\"pages\":\"97-105\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Somatosensory and Motor Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08990220.2021.2018293\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Somatosensory and Motor Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08990220.2021.2018293","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的:比较本体感觉神经肌肉促进术和肌筋膜释放术对肩峰下撞击综合征患者疼痛、活动范围、肌力、生活质量、功能和残疾的影响。方法:30例患者随机分为本体感觉神经肌肉促进组(n = 15)和本体感觉神经肌肉促进联合肌筋膜释放技术组(n = 15)。两种治疗方法均为每周3次,连续4周。通过视觉模拟量表评估疼痛严重程度,通过关节计评估运动范围,通过数字手测力仪评估肌肉力量,通过诺丁汉健康概况评估生活质量,通过手臂、肩部和手部问题问卷评估功能,通过肩部疼痛和残疾指数评估残疾程度。所有测量均在治疗前后使用。疼痛严重程度,活动范围和肌肉力量也在第一次疗程后进行评估。结果:治疗后两组患者肩关节疼痛、活动度、肌力、功能和失能均有明显改善(p pp)。结论:本体感觉神经肌肉促进联合肌筋膜释放技术对肩峰下撞击综合征患者的疼痛、活动度、肌力、功能、失能和生活质量均有更为急性和累积的积极作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effectiveness of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation and myofascial release techniques in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome.

Purpose: To compare the effectiveness of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation and myofascial release technique in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome on pain, range of motion, muscle strength, quality of life, functionality and disability.

Methods: Thirty patients were randomly divided into two groups: proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation group (n = 15) and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation combined with myofascial release technique group (n = 15). Both treatment methods were performed 3 times a week for 4 weeks. Pain severity was assessed by Visuel Analog Scale, range of motion by a goniometer, muscle strength by digital hand dynamometer, quality of life by Nottingham health profile, functionality by arm, shoulder and hand problems questionnaire, disability by shoulder pain and disability index. All measurements were used before and after treatments. Pain severity, range of motion and muscle strength were also evaluated after the first session.

Results: After the treatment, shoulder pain, range of motion, muscle strength, functionality and disability were improved in two groups (p < 0.05). Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation showed improvement in pain, whereas myofascial release technique improved pain, physical activity, emotional state, sleep and total dimensions of life quality (p < 0.05). Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation was more effective in reducing activity pain, whereas myofascial release technique was more effective in increasing flexion, external and internal rotation range of motion, flexion and abduction muscle strength after the first session (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: The combined application of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation and myofascial release technique has a more acute and cumulative positive effect on pain, range of motion, muscle strength, functionality, disability and quality of life in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Somatosensory and Motor Research
Somatosensory and Motor Research 医学-神经科学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Somatosensory & Motor Research publishes original, high-quality papers that encompass the entire range of investigations related to the neural bases for somatic sensation, somatic motor function, somatic motor integration, and modeling thereof. Comprising anatomical, physiological, biochemical, pharmacological, behavioural, and psychophysical studies, Somatosensory & Motor Research covers all facets of the peripheral and central processes underlying cutaneous sensation, and includes studies relating to afferent and efferent mechanisms of deep structures (e.g., viscera, muscle). Studies of motor systems at all levels of the neuraxis are covered, but reports restricted to non-neural aspects of muscle generally would belong in other journals.
期刊最新文献
Association between executive and physical functions in people with Parkinson's disease. Muscular endurance and its association with neck pain, disability, neck awareness, and kinesiophobia in patients with chronic neck pain. Neuroplasticity changes in knee osteoarthritis (KOA) indexed by event-related desynchronization/synchronization during a motor inhibition task. Barrels XXXV: barrels in-person. Real-time vibrotactile pattern generation and identification using discrete event-driven feedback.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1