肯尼亚西部公共部门保健机构计划生育等待时间过长的频率和影响。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Global Health Action Pub Date : 2022-12-31 DOI:10.1080/16549716.2022.2128305
Caitlin R Williams, Laura E Britton, Brooke W Bullington, Debborah Muthoki Wambua, Dickens Otieno Onyango, Katherine Tumlinson
{"title":"肯尼亚西部公共部门保健机构计划生育等待时间过长的频率和影响。","authors":"Caitlin R Williams,&nbsp;Laura E Britton,&nbsp;Brooke W Bullington,&nbsp;Debborah Muthoki Wambua,&nbsp;Dickens Otieno Onyango,&nbsp;Katherine Tumlinson","doi":"10.1080/16549716.2022.2128305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Long wait times for family planning services are a barrier to high quality care and client satisfaction. Existing literature examining family planning wait times has methodological limitations, as most studies use data collected during exit interviews, which are subject to recall, courtesy, and selection bias.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We sought to employ a mixed methods approach to capture the prevalence, length, causes, and impacts of wait times for family planning services in Western Kenya.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used mystery clients, focus groups, key informant interviews, and journey mapping workshops to measure and describe family planning wait times. Fifteen mystery clients visited 60 public-sector facilities to quantitatively capture wait times. We conducted eight focus group discussions with 55 current or former family planning clients and 19 key informant interviews to understand facility-level barriers to family planning and feasible solutions. Finally, we visualized the process of seeking and providing family planning with journey mapping workshops with nine clients and 12 providers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mystery clients waited, on average, 74 minutes to be seen for family planning services. In focus group discussions and key informant interviews, three themes emerged: the nature of wait times, the impact of wait times, and how to address wait times. Clients characterized long wait times as a barrier to achieving their reproductive desires. Key informants perceived provider shortages to cause long wait times, which reduced quality of family planning services. Both providers and family planning clients suggested increasing staffing or offering specialization to decrease wait times and increase quality of care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our mixed methods approach revealed that wait times for family planning services were common, could be extensive, and were viewed as a barrier to high quality of care by clients, providers, and key informants. Across the board, participants felt that addressing workforce shortages would enhance service delivery and thus promote reproductive autonomy among women in Kenya.</p>","PeriodicalId":49197,"journal":{"name":"Global Health Action","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9543147/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Frequency and impact of long wait times for family planning in public-sector healthcare facilities in Western Kenya.\",\"authors\":\"Caitlin R Williams,&nbsp;Laura E Britton,&nbsp;Brooke W Bullington,&nbsp;Debborah Muthoki Wambua,&nbsp;Dickens Otieno Onyango,&nbsp;Katherine Tumlinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/16549716.2022.2128305\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Long wait times for family planning services are a barrier to high quality care and client satisfaction. Existing literature examining family planning wait times has methodological limitations, as most studies use data collected during exit interviews, which are subject to recall, courtesy, and selection bias.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We sought to employ a mixed methods approach to capture the prevalence, length, causes, and impacts of wait times for family planning services in Western Kenya.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used mystery clients, focus groups, key informant interviews, and journey mapping workshops to measure and describe family planning wait times. Fifteen mystery clients visited 60 public-sector facilities to quantitatively capture wait times. We conducted eight focus group discussions with 55 current or former family planning clients and 19 key informant interviews to understand facility-level barriers to family planning and feasible solutions. Finally, we visualized the process of seeking and providing family planning with journey mapping workshops with nine clients and 12 providers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mystery clients waited, on average, 74 minutes to be seen for family planning services. In focus group discussions and key informant interviews, three themes emerged: the nature of wait times, the impact of wait times, and how to address wait times. Clients characterized long wait times as a barrier to achieving their reproductive desires. Key informants perceived provider shortages to cause long wait times, which reduced quality of family planning services. Both providers and family planning clients suggested increasing staffing or offering specialization to decrease wait times and increase quality of care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our mixed methods approach revealed that wait times for family planning services were common, could be extensive, and were viewed as a barrier to high quality of care by clients, providers, and key informants. Across the board, participants felt that addressing workforce shortages would enhance service delivery and thus promote reproductive autonomy among women in Kenya.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Health Action\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9543147/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Health Action\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2022.2128305\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Health Action","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2022.2128305","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:计划生育服务的长时间等待是高质量护理和客户满意度的障碍。现有的研究计划生育等待时间的文献在方法上存在局限性,因为大多数研究使用的是在离职面谈期间收集的数据,这些数据受到回忆、礼貌和选择偏差的影响。目的:我们试图采用一种混合方法的方法来捕捉患病率,长度,原因,以及在肯尼亚西部计划生育服务的等待时间的影响。方法:采用神秘客户、焦点小组、关键信息提供者访谈和行程绘图研讨会等方法来测量和描述计划生育等待时间。15个神秘客户访问了60个公共部门设施,以定量捕获等待时间。我们对55名现有或曾经的计划生育客户进行了8次焦点小组讨论,并对19名关键信息提供者进行了访谈,以了解设施层面的计划生育障碍和可行的解决方案。最后,我们将寻求和提供计划生育服务的过程可视化,并与9个客户和12个提供者进行了旅程地图研讨会。结果:神秘客户平均等待74分钟才能看到计划生育服务。在焦点小组讨论和关键信息提供者访谈中,出现了三个主题:等待时间的性质、等待时间的影响以及如何解决等待时间。客户认为漫长的等待时间阻碍了他们实现生育愿望。主要举报人认为提供者短缺导致等待时间过长,从而降低了计划生育服务的质量。提供者和计划生育客户都建议增加人员配置或提供专业化服务,以减少等待时间,提高护理质量。结论:我们的混合方法方法显示,计划生育服务的等待时间很普遍,可能很广泛,并且被客户,提供者和关键线人视为高质量护理的障碍。与会者普遍认为,解决劳动力短缺问题将加强提供服务,从而促进肯尼亚妇女的生殖自主。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Frequency and impact of long wait times for family planning in public-sector healthcare facilities in Western Kenya.

Background: Long wait times for family planning services are a barrier to high quality care and client satisfaction. Existing literature examining family planning wait times has methodological limitations, as most studies use data collected during exit interviews, which are subject to recall, courtesy, and selection bias.

Objective: We sought to employ a mixed methods approach to capture the prevalence, length, causes, and impacts of wait times for family planning services in Western Kenya.

Methods: We used mystery clients, focus groups, key informant interviews, and journey mapping workshops to measure and describe family planning wait times. Fifteen mystery clients visited 60 public-sector facilities to quantitatively capture wait times. We conducted eight focus group discussions with 55 current or former family planning clients and 19 key informant interviews to understand facility-level barriers to family planning and feasible solutions. Finally, we visualized the process of seeking and providing family planning with journey mapping workshops with nine clients and 12 providers.

Results: Mystery clients waited, on average, 74 minutes to be seen for family planning services. In focus group discussions and key informant interviews, three themes emerged: the nature of wait times, the impact of wait times, and how to address wait times. Clients characterized long wait times as a barrier to achieving their reproductive desires. Key informants perceived provider shortages to cause long wait times, which reduced quality of family planning services. Both providers and family planning clients suggested increasing staffing or offering specialization to decrease wait times and increase quality of care.

Conclusion: Our mixed methods approach revealed that wait times for family planning services were common, could be extensive, and were viewed as a barrier to high quality of care by clients, providers, and key informants. Across the board, participants felt that addressing workforce shortages would enhance service delivery and thus promote reproductive autonomy among women in Kenya.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Health Action
Global Health Action PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
108
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Health Action is an international peer-reviewed Open Access journal affiliated with the Unit of Epidemiology and Global Health, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine at Umeå University, Sweden. The Unit hosts the Umeå International School of Public Health and the Umeå Centre for Global Health Research. Vision: Our vision is to be a leading journal in the global health field, narrowing health information gaps and contributing to the implementation of policies and actions that lead to improved global health. Aim: The widening gap between the winners and losers of globalisation presents major public health challenges. To meet these challenges, it is crucial to generate new knowledge and evidence in the field and in settings where the evidence is lacking, as well as to bridge the gaps between existing knowledge and implementation of relevant findings. Thus, the aim of Global Health Action is to contribute to fuelling a more concrete, hands-on approach to addressing global health challenges. Manuscripts suggesting strategies for practical interventions and research implementations where none already exist are specifically welcomed. Further, the journal encourages articles from low- and middle-income countries, while also welcoming articles originated from South-South and South-North collaborations. All articles are expected to address a global agenda and include a strong implementation or policy component.
期刊最新文献
Prevalence and associated factors for poor mental health among young migrants in Sweden: a cross-sectional study. The effectiveness of rural community health workers in improving health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review. Adaptation and validation of the Children's Surgical Assessment Tool for Rwandan district hospitals. Electronic health record and primary care physician self-reported quality of care: a multilevel study in China. Recruiting hard-to-reach populations via respondent driven sampling for mobile phone surveys in Colombia: a qualitative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1