在临床试验试点中利用区块链技术进行知情同意过程和患者参与。

Baldwin C Mak, Bryan T Addeman, Jia Chen, Kim A Papp, Melinda J Gooderham, Lyn C Guenther, Yi Liu, Uli C Broedl, Marianne E Logger
{"title":"在临床试验试点中利用区块链技术进行知情同意过程和患者参与。","authors":"Baldwin C Mak,&nbsp;Bryan T Addeman,&nbsp;Jia Chen,&nbsp;Kim A Papp,&nbsp;Melinda J Gooderham,&nbsp;Lyn C Guenther,&nbsp;Yi Liu,&nbsp;Uli C Broedl,&nbsp;Marianne E Logger","doi":"10.30953/bhty.v4.182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Despite the implementation of quality assurance procedures, current clinical trial management processes are time-consuming, costly, and often susceptible to error. This can result in limited trust, transparency, and process inefficiencies, without true patient empowerment. The objective of this study was to determine whether blockchain technology could enforce trust, transparency, and patient empowerment in the clinical trial data management process, while reducing trial cost.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>In this proof of concept pilot, we deployed a Hyperledger Fabric-based blockchain system in an active clinical trial setting to assess the impact of blockchain technology on mean monitoring visit time and cost, non-compliances, and user experience. Using a parallel study design, we compared differences between blockchain technology and standard methodology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 12 trial participants, seven study coordinators and three clinical research associates across five sites participated in the pilot. Blockchain technology significantly reduces total mean monitoring visit time and cost versus standard trial management (475 to 7 min; <i>P</i> = 0.001; €722 to €10; <i>P</i> = 0.001 per participant/visit, respectively), while enhancing patient trust, transparency, and empowerment in 91, 82 and 63% of the patients, respectively. No difference in non-compliances as a marker of trial quality was detected.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Blockchain technology holds promise to improve patient-centricity and to reduce trial cost compared to conventional clinical trial management. The ability of this technology to improve trial quality warrants further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":72422,"journal":{"name":"Blockchain in healthcare today","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9907430/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Leveraging Blockchain Technology for Informed Consent Process and Patient Engagement in a Clinical Trial Pilot.\",\"authors\":\"Baldwin C Mak,&nbsp;Bryan T Addeman,&nbsp;Jia Chen,&nbsp;Kim A Papp,&nbsp;Melinda J Gooderham,&nbsp;Lyn C Guenther,&nbsp;Yi Liu,&nbsp;Uli C Broedl,&nbsp;Marianne E Logger\",\"doi\":\"10.30953/bhty.v4.182\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Despite the implementation of quality assurance procedures, current clinical trial management processes are time-consuming, costly, and often susceptible to error. This can result in limited trust, transparency, and process inefficiencies, without true patient empowerment. The objective of this study was to determine whether blockchain technology could enforce trust, transparency, and patient empowerment in the clinical trial data management process, while reducing trial cost.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>In this proof of concept pilot, we deployed a Hyperledger Fabric-based blockchain system in an active clinical trial setting to assess the impact of blockchain technology on mean monitoring visit time and cost, non-compliances, and user experience. Using a parallel study design, we compared differences between blockchain technology and standard methodology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 12 trial participants, seven study coordinators and three clinical research associates across five sites participated in the pilot. Blockchain technology significantly reduces total mean monitoring visit time and cost versus standard trial management (475 to 7 min; <i>P</i> = 0.001; €722 to €10; <i>P</i> = 0.001 per participant/visit, respectively), while enhancing patient trust, transparency, and empowerment in 91, 82 and 63% of the patients, respectively. No difference in non-compliances as a marker of trial quality was detected.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Blockchain technology holds promise to improve patient-centricity and to reduce trial cost compared to conventional clinical trial management. The ability of this technology to improve trial quality warrants further investigation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Blockchain in healthcare today\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9907430/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Blockchain in healthcare today\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30953/bhty.v4.182\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blockchain in healthcare today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30953/bhty.v4.182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:尽管实施了质量保证程序,但目前的临床试验管理过程耗时、昂贵,而且经常容易出错。这可能导致信任有限、透明度和流程效率低下,没有真正的患者授权。本研究的目的是确定区块链技术是否可以在临床试验数据管理过程中加强信任、透明度和患者授权,同时降低试验成本。设计:在这个概念验证试点中,我们在一个积极的临床试验环境中部署了一个基于Hyperledger fabric的区块链系统,以评估区块链技术对平均监测访问时间和成本、不合规和用户体验的影响。使用并行研究设计,我们比较了区块链技术和标准方法之间的差异。结果:共有12名试验参与者,7名研究协调员和3名临床研究助理参与了5个站点的试验。与标准试验管理相比,区块链技术显著减少了总平均监测访问时间和成本(475至7分钟);P = 0.001;722欧元至10欧元;P = 0.001(每个参与者/访问),同时分别在91%、82%和63%的患者中增强了患者的信任、透明度和授权。作为试验质量的标志,未检测到不合规的差异。结论:与传统的临床试验管理相比,区块链技术有望改善以患者为中心的状况,并降低试验成本。这项技术提高审判质量的能力值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Leveraging Blockchain Technology for Informed Consent Process and Patient Engagement in a Clinical Trial Pilot.

Objective: Despite the implementation of quality assurance procedures, current clinical trial management processes are time-consuming, costly, and often susceptible to error. This can result in limited trust, transparency, and process inefficiencies, without true patient empowerment. The objective of this study was to determine whether blockchain technology could enforce trust, transparency, and patient empowerment in the clinical trial data management process, while reducing trial cost.

Design: In this proof of concept pilot, we deployed a Hyperledger Fabric-based blockchain system in an active clinical trial setting to assess the impact of blockchain technology on mean monitoring visit time and cost, non-compliances, and user experience. Using a parallel study design, we compared differences between blockchain technology and standard methodology.

Results: A total of 12 trial participants, seven study coordinators and three clinical research associates across five sites participated in the pilot. Blockchain technology significantly reduces total mean monitoring visit time and cost versus standard trial management (475 to 7 min; P = 0.001; €722 to €10; P = 0.001 per participant/visit, respectively), while enhancing patient trust, transparency, and empowerment in 91, 82 and 63% of the patients, respectively. No difference in non-compliances as a marker of trial quality was detected.

Conclusion: Blockchain technology holds promise to improve patient-centricity and to reduce trial cost compared to conventional clinical trial management. The ability of this technology to improve trial quality warrants further investigation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Emerging Trends in Cybersecurity: A Holistic View on Current Threats, Assessing Solutions, and Pioneering New Frontiers. Leveraging Decentralized Clinical Trial Management Systems (dCTMS) to Advance Science: Exploring Challenges Related to the Diffusion of Innovation and Its Execution. Non-Fungible Tokens for Organoids: Decentralized Biobanking to Empower Patients in Biospecimen Research. Crypto-Secure Data Management for Healthcare Harnessing Blockchain to Transform Healthcare Data Management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1