与在线医生面对面:远程会诊患者体验的现象学分析》。

IF 0.8 2区 哲学 Q3 ETHICS Human Studies Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-11-28 DOI:10.1007/s10746-022-09652-4
Māra Grīnfelde
{"title":"与在线医生面对面:远程会诊患者体验的现象学分析》。","authors":"Māra Grīnfelde","doi":"10.1007/s10746-022-09652-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The global crisis of the COVID-19 pandemic has considerably accelerated the adoption of teleconsultation-a form of consultation between patient and health care professional that occurs via videoconferencing platforms. For this reason, it is important to investigate the way in which this form of interaction modifies the nature of the clinical encounter and the extent to which this modification impacts the healing process. For this purpose, I will refer to insights into the clinical encounter as a face-to-face encounter drawn from the phenomenology of medicine (R. Zaner, K. Toombs, E. Pellegrino). I will also take into account a criticism that has been expressed by various contemporary phenomenologists (H. Dreyfus, T. Fuchs, L. Dolezal, H. Carel), namely, that due to the lack of physical proximity to the other in all types of online encounters, such encounters lack significant features that are present in face-to-face encounters, with the most important of these being the possibility of attaining an empathetic perception of the other and a sense of embodied risk. As these elements are essential features of the clinical encounter, the aim of this paper is to determine whether teleconsultation exhibits these features. To do that, I will integrate phenomenological philosophy with qualitative research drawing materials from both the philosophical tradition, particularly with respect to the concepts of the face-to-face encounter and embodied risk (A. Schutz and H. Dreyfus), and qualitative research study regarding patient experiences of teleconsultation. I will argue that teleconsultation does involve both the possibility of perceiving the other empathetically and the possibility of experiencing a sense of embodied risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":13027,"journal":{"name":"Human Studies","volume":"45 4","pages":"673-696"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9707169/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Face-to-Face with the Doctor Online: Phenomenological Analysis of Patient Experience of Teleconsultation.\",\"authors\":\"Māra Grīnfelde\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10746-022-09652-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The global crisis of the COVID-19 pandemic has considerably accelerated the adoption of teleconsultation-a form of consultation between patient and health care professional that occurs via videoconferencing platforms. For this reason, it is important to investigate the way in which this form of interaction modifies the nature of the clinical encounter and the extent to which this modification impacts the healing process. For this purpose, I will refer to insights into the clinical encounter as a face-to-face encounter drawn from the phenomenology of medicine (R. Zaner, K. Toombs, E. Pellegrino). I will also take into account a criticism that has been expressed by various contemporary phenomenologists (H. Dreyfus, T. Fuchs, L. Dolezal, H. Carel), namely, that due to the lack of physical proximity to the other in all types of online encounters, such encounters lack significant features that are present in face-to-face encounters, with the most important of these being the possibility of attaining an empathetic perception of the other and a sense of embodied risk. As these elements are essential features of the clinical encounter, the aim of this paper is to determine whether teleconsultation exhibits these features. To do that, I will integrate phenomenological philosophy with qualitative research drawing materials from both the philosophical tradition, particularly with respect to the concepts of the face-to-face encounter and embodied risk (A. Schutz and H. Dreyfus), and qualitative research study regarding patient experiences of teleconsultation. I will argue that teleconsultation does involve both the possibility of perceiving the other empathetically and the possibility of experiencing a sense of embodied risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13027,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Studies\",\"volume\":\"45 4\",\"pages\":\"673-696\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9707169/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-022-09652-4\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/11/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-022-09652-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/11/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

COVID-19 大流行造成的全球危机大大加速了远程会诊的采用--一种病人与医护人员通过视频会议平台进行会诊的形式。因此,研究这种互动形式如何改变临床会诊的性质以及这种改变在多大程度上影响治疗过程非常重要。为此,我将参考医学现象学(R. Zaner、K. Toombs、E. Pellegrino)将临床诊疗视为面对面诊疗的观点。我还将考虑到当代现象学家(H. Dreyfus、T. Fuchs、L. Dolezal、H. Carel)提出的批评意见,即由于所有类型的在线会面都缺乏与对方的身体接近,因此这种会面缺乏面对面会面所具有的重要特征,其中最重要的特征是有可能获得对对方的移情感知和体现风险的感觉。由于这些要素是临床会诊的基本特征,本文旨在确定远程会诊是否具有这些特征。为此,我将把现象学哲学与定性研究结合起来,从哲学传统(特别是关于面对面接触和体现风险的概念)(A. Schutz 和 H. Dreyfus)和关于远程会诊患者体验的定性研究中汲取材料。我将论证,远程会诊确实涉及以移情的方式感知他人的可能性和体验体现风险的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Face-to-Face with the Doctor Online: Phenomenological Analysis of Patient Experience of Teleconsultation.

The global crisis of the COVID-19 pandemic has considerably accelerated the adoption of teleconsultation-a form of consultation between patient and health care professional that occurs via videoconferencing platforms. For this reason, it is important to investigate the way in which this form of interaction modifies the nature of the clinical encounter and the extent to which this modification impacts the healing process. For this purpose, I will refer to insights into the clinical encounter as a face-to-face encounter drawn from the phenomenology of medicine (R. Zaner, K. Toombs, E. Pellegrino). I will also take into account a criticism that has been expressed by various contemporary phenomenologists (H. Dreyfus, T. Fuchs, L. Dolezal, H. Carel), namely, that due to the lack of physical proximity to the other in all types of online encounters, such encounters lack significant features that are present in face-to-face encounters, with the most important of these being the possibility of attaining an empathetic perception of the other and a sense of embodied risk. As these elements are essential features of the clinical encounter, the aim of this paper is to determine whether teleconsultation exhibits these features. To do that, I will integrate phenomenological philosophy with qualitative research drawing materials from both the philosophical tradition, particularly with respect to the concepts of the face-to-face encounter and embodied risk (A. Schutz and H. Dreyfus), and qualitative research study regarding patient experiences of teleconsultation. I will argue that teleconsultation does involve both the possibility of perceiving the other empathetically and the possibility of experiencing a sense of embodied risk.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Human Studies
Human Studies Multiple-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Human Studies is an international quarterly journal dedicated primarily to take forward and enlarge the dialogue between philosophy and the human sciences. Therefore the journal addresses theoretical and empirical topics as well as philosophical investigations in different areas of the human sciences. Phenomenological perspectives and hermeneutical orientations, broadly defined, are the primary focus and frame for published papers. The journal benefits from scholars working in a variety of fields and who seek a forum to address these issues, in order to bridge the gap between philosophical and other modes of inquiry in the human sciences.    Considering this as the main conceptual aim of Human Studies its wide-ranging interdisciplinary coverage includes contributions from sociology, philosophy, psychology, political science, communication studies, social geography, anthropology, history, and qualitative social research (especially ethnomethodology). A particular accent is set upon communication possibilities between these different perspectives. Thus, interdisciplinary approaches using phenomenology as starting point and reference in trying to analyze and explain the social reality are encouraged and welcome. Both established lines of interpretation and contemporary questions can be used either as basis or subject-matter.  Human Studies is the official journal of the Society for Phenomenology and the Human Sciences (SPHS).
期刊最新文献
Wire Osteosynthesis in the Treatment of Mandible Fractures in Low Resource Settings: A Force Study. Touch and Closeness in Naturally Organized Activities Thrown into the World, Attached to Love: On the Forms of World-Sharing and Mourning in Heidegger Consciousness of Emotion and Emotive Consciousness in Geiger and Husserl Intentionality as Tendency and Intentionality as Consciousness-of
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1