动物生物科学本土观点综述。

IF 8.7 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Annual Review of Animal Biosciences Pub Date : 2023-02-15 DOI:10.1146/annurev-animal-051622-091935
Kelsey Dayle John, Gilbert H John
{"title":"动物生物科学本土观点综述。","authors":"Kelsey Dayle John,&nbsp;Gilbert H John","doi":"10.1146/annurev-animal-051622-091935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article addresses the underrepresentation of Indigenous perspectives in animal sciences by challenging the exclusive use of Western scientific paradigms in research and education. Because of the systematic exclusion of Indigenous peoples, Indigenous perspectives have rarely been represented through empirical study, leading us to believe this is a key reason for the underrepresentation of Native people in these fields. We conducted a literature review, searching for Indigenous contributions in animal sciences and finding a handful of articles in three areas: human-animal bonds, genetic testing and breeding programs, and Traditional Ecological Knowledge. Given the interconnected paradigm of Indigenous worldviews, we suggest that the ongoing siloes of scientific disciplines and the hierarchy of methodology contribute to the dearth of Indigenous perspectives. We suggest increased support for proper tribal consultation, contextualization of the history of research in Native communities, and the creation of scholarly spaces to support these conversations.</p>","PeriodicalId":48953,"journal":{"name":"Annual Review of Animal Biosciences","volume":"11 ","pages":"307-319"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Review of Indigenous Perspectives in Animal Biosciences.\",\"authors\":\"Kelsey Dayle John,&nbsp;Gilbert H John\",\"doi\":\"10.1146/annurev-animal-051622-091935\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This article addresses the underrepresentation of Indigenous perspectives in animal sciences by challenging the exclusive use of Western scientific paradigms in research and education. Because of the systematic exclusion of Indigenous peoples, Indigenous perspectives have rarely been represented through empirical study, leading us to believe this is a key reason for the underrepresentation of Native people in these fields. We conducted a literature review, searching for Indigenous contributions in animal sciences and finding a handful of articles in three areas: human-animal bonds, genetic testing and breeding programs, and Traditional Ecological Knowledge. Given the interconnected paradigm of Indigenous worldviews, we suggest that the ongoing siloes of scientific disciplines and the hierarchy of methodology contribute to the dearth of Indigenous perspectives. We suggest increased support for proper tribal consultation, contextualization of the history of research in Native communities, and the creation of scholarly spaces to support these conversations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48953,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annual Review of Animal Biosciences\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"307-319\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annual Review of Animal Biosciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-animal-051622-091935\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Review of Animal Biosciences","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-animal-051622-091935","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文通过挑战在研究和教育中只使用西方科学范式来解决动物科学中土著观点代表性不足的问题。由于对土著人民的系统性排斥,土著观点很少通过实证研究得到体现,这使我们相信这是土著人民在这些领域代表性不足的关键原因。我们进行了文献综述,寻找在动物科学方面的本土贡献,并在三个领域找到了一些文章:人与动物的联系,基因测试和育种计划,以及传统生态知识。鉴于土著世界观相互关联的范式,我们认为,科学学科的持续筒仓和方法论的等级制度导致了土著观点的缺乏。我们建议增加对适当的部落磋商的支持,土著社区研究历史的背景化,以及创建支持这些对话的学术空间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Review of Indigenous Perspectives in Animal Biosciences.

This article addresses the underrepresentation of Indigenous perspectives in animal sciences by challenging the exclusive use of Western scientific paradigms in research and education. Because of the systematic exclusion of Indigenous peoples, Indigenous perspectives have rarely been represented through empirical study, leading us to believe this is a key reason for the underrepresentation of Native people in these fields. We conducted a literature review, searching for Indigenous contributions in animal sciences and finding a handful of articles in three areas: human-animal bonds, genetic testing and breeding programs, and Traditional Ecological Knowledge. Given the interconnected paradigm of Indigenous worldviews, we suggest that the ongoing siloes of scientific disciplines and the hierarchy of methodology contribute to the dearth of Indigenous perspectives. We suggest increased support for proper tribal consultation, contextualization of the history of research in Native communities, and the creation of scholarly spaces to support these conversations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annual Review of Animal Biosciences
Annual Review of Animal Biosciences BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY-ZOOLOGY
CiteScore
21.30
自引率
0.80%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: The Annual Review of Animal Biosciences is primarily dedicated to the fields of biotechnology, genetics, genomics, and breeding, with a special focus on veterinary medicine. This includes veterinary pathobiology, infectious diseases and vaccine development, and conservation and zoo biology. The publication aims to address the needs of scientists studying both wild and domesticated animal species, veterinarians, conservation biologists, and geneticists.
期刊最新文献
Comparative Genomics and Epigenomics of Transcriptional Regulation. Lipotoxicity and Oocyte Quality in Mammals: Pathogenesis, Consequences, and Reversibility. The Rhesus Macaque as an Animal Model for Human Nutrition: An Ecological-Evolutionary Perspective. A One Health Approach to Reducing Livestock Disease Prevalence in Developing Countries: Advances, Challenges, and Prospects. A Passion for Small Things and Staying Primed: My Career in Virology and Immunology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1