基于体重指数的 "纯磁共振 "腹部磁共振引导自适应放射治疗方法。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.12.001
{"title":"基于体重指数的 \"纯磁共振 \"腹部磁共振引导自适应放射治疗方法。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Dose calculation for MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) at the 0.35 T MR-Linac is currently based on deformation of planning CTs (defCT) acquired for each patient. We present a simple and robust bulk density overwrite synthetic CT (sCT) method for abdominal treatments in order to streamline clinical workflows.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Fifty-six abdominal patient treatment plans were retrospectively evaluated. All patients had been treated at the MR-Linac using MR datasets for treatment planning and plan adaption and defCT for dose calculation. Bulk density CTs (4M-sCT) were generated from MR images with four material compartments (bone, lung, air, soft tissue). The relative electron densities (RED) for bone and lung were extracted from contoured CT structure average REDs. For soft tissue, a correlation between BMI and RED was evaluated. Dose was recalculated on 4M-sCT and compared to dose distributions on defCTs assessing dose differences in the PTV and organs at risk (OAR).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Mean RED of bone was 1.17 ± 0.02, mean RED of lung 0.17 ± 0.05. The correlation between BMI and RED for soft tissue was statistically significant (p &lt; 0.01). PTV dose differences between 4M-sCT and defCT were D<sub>mean</sub>: −0.4 ± 1.0%, D<sub>1%</sub>: −0.3 ± 1.1% and D<sub>95%</sub>: −0.5 ± 1.0%. OARs showed D<sub>2%</sub>: −0.3 ± 1.9% and D<sub>mean</sub>: −0.1 ± 1.4% differences. Local 3D gamma index pass rates (2%/2mm) between dose calculated using 4M-sCT and defCT were 96.8 ± 2.6% (range 89.9–99.6%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The presented method for sCT generation enables precise dose calculation for MR-only abdominal MRgRT.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54397,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik","volume":"34 3","pages":"Pages 456-467"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939388922001349/pdfft?md5=96a02bfed77ffd9d1bc9385391487bd1&pid=1-s2.0-S0939388922001349-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A body mass index-based method for “MR-only” abdominal MR-guided adaptive radiotherapy\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.12.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Dose calculation for MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) at the 0.35 T MR-Linac is currently based on deformation of planning CTs (defCT) acquired for each patient. We present a simple and robust bulk density overwrite synthetic CT (sCT) method for abdominal treatments in order to streamline clinical workflows.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Fifty-six abdominal patient treatment plans were retrospectively evaluated. All patients had been treated at the MR-Linac using MR datasets for treatment planning and plan adaption and defCT for dose calculation. Bulk density CTs (4M-sCT) were generated from MR images with four material compartments (bone, lung, air, soft tissue). The relative electron densities (RED) for bone and lung were extracted from contoured CT structure average REDs. For soft tissue, a correlation between BMI and RED was evaluated. Dose was recalculated on 4M-sCT and compared to dose distributions on defCTs assessing dose differences in the PTV and organs at risk (OAR).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Mean RED of bone was 1.17 ± 0.02, mean RED of lung 0.17 ± 0.05. The correlation between BMI and RED for soft tissue was statistically significant (p &lt; 0.01). PTV dose differences between 4M-sCT and defCT were D<sub>mean</sub>: −0.4 ± 1.0%, D<sub>1%</sub>: −0.3 ± 1.1% and D<sub>95%</sub>: −0.5 ± 1.0%. OARs showed D<sub>2%</sub>: −0.3 ± 1.9% and D<sub>mean</sub>: −0.1 ± 1.4% differences. Local 3D gamma index pass rates (2%/2mm) between dose calculated using 4M-sCT and defCT were 96.8 ± 2.6% (range 89.9–99.6%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The presented method for sCT generation enables precise dose calculation for MR-only abdominal MRgRT.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54397,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik\",\"volume\":\"34 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 456-467\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939388922001349/pdfft?md5=96a02bfed77ffd9d1bc9385391487bd1&pid=1-s2.0-S0939388922001349-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939388922001349\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939388922001349","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:目前,在 0.35 T MR-Linac 上进行磁共振引导放疗 (MRgRT) 的剂量计算基于为每位患者获取的计划 CT(defCT)的变形。我们针对腹部治疗提出了一种简单、稳健的体密度覆盖合成 CT(sCT)方法,以简化临床工作流程:方法:我们对 56 例腹部患者的治疗计划进行了回顾性评估。所有患者均在磁共振Linac接受过治疗,治疗计划和计划调整使用磁共振数据集,剂量计算使用defCT。大体密度 CT(4M-sCT)由四个物质区(骨、肺、空气、软组织)的磁共振图像生成。骨和肺的相对电子密度(RED)是从轮廓 CT 结构平均 RED 中提取的。对于软组织,则评估了 BMI 与 RED 之间的相关性。在 4M-sCT 上重新计算剂量,并与 defCT 上的剂量分布进行比较,评估 PTV 和危险器官 (OAR) 的剂量差异:结果:骨的平均 RED 为 1.17 ± 0.02,肺的平均 RED 为 0.17 ± 0.05。体重指数(BMI)与软组织 RED 之间的相关性具有统计学意义(P 平均值:-0.4 ± 1.0):-0.4 ± 1.0%, D1%:-0.3±1.1%,D95%:-0.5 ± 1.0%.OAR 显示 D2%:-0.3 ± 1.9%,D95%:-0.5 ± 1.0%:-0.3 ± 1.9% 和 Dmean:差异为-0.1 ± 1.4%。使用4M-sCT和defCT计算的剂量之间的局部三维伽马指数通过率(2%/2mm)为96.8 ± 2.6%(范围89.9-99.6%):结论:所介绍的 sCT 生成方法可精确计算仅磁共振腹部 MRgRT 的剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A body mass index-based method for “MR-only” abdominal MR-guided adaptive radiotherapy

Purpose

Dose calculation for MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) at the 0.35 T MR-Linac is currently based on deformation of planning CTs (defCT) acquired for each patient. We present a simple and robust bulk density overwrite synthetic CT (sCT) method for abdominal treatments in order to streamline clinical workflows.

Method

Fifty-six abdominal patient treatment plans were retrospectively evaluated. All patients had been treated at the MR-Linac using MR datasets for treatment planning and plan adaption and defCT for dose calculation. Bulk density CTs (4M-sCT) were generated from MR images with four material compartments (bone, lung, air, soft tissue). The relative electron densities (RED) for bone and lung were extracted from contoured CT structure average REDs. For soft tissue, a correlation between BMI and RED was evaluated. Dose was recalculated on 4M-sCT and compared to dose distributions on defCTs assessing dose differences in the PTV and organs at risk (OAR).

Results

Mean RED of bone was 1.17 ± 0.02, mean RED of lung 0.17 ± 0.05. The correlation between BMI and RED for soft tissue was statistically significant (p < 0.01). PTV dose differences between 4M-sCT and defCT were Dmean: −0.4 ± 1.0%, D1%: −0.3 ± 1.1% and D95%: −0.5 ± 1.0%. OARs showed D2%: −0.3 ± 1.9% and Dmean: −0.1 ± 1.4% differences. Local 3D gamma index pass rates (2%/2mm) between dose calculated using 4M-sCT and defCT were 96.8 ± 2.6% (range 89.9–99.6%).

Conclusion

The presented method for sCT generation enables precise dose calculation for MR-only abdominal MRgRT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik (Journal of Medical Physics) is an official organ of the German and Austrian Society of Medical Physic and the Swiss Society of Radiobiology and Medical Physics.The Journal is a platform for basic research and practical applications of physical procedures in medical diagnostics and therapy. The articles are reviewed following international standards of peer reviewing. Focuses of the articles are: -Biophysical methods in radiation therapy and nuclear medicine -Dosimetry and radiation protection -Radiological diagnostics and quality assurance -Modern imaging techniques, such as computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography -Ultrasonography diagnostics, application of laser and UV rays -Electronic processing of biosignals -Artificial intelligence and machine learning in medical physics In the Journal, the latest scientific insights find their expression in the form of original articles, reviews, technical communications, and information for the clinical practice.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Contents Source-detector trajectory optimization for CBCT metal artifact reduction based on PICCS reconstruction Reduction of patient specific quality assurance through plan complexity metrics for VMAT plans with an open-source TPS script Post-mastectomy radiotherapy: Impact of bolus thickness and irradiation technique on skin dose
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1