Aloysia Ispriantari, Rismia Agustina, Kennedy Diema Konlan, Hyejung Lee
{"title":"以家庭为中心的干预措施对1型糖尿病儿童和青少年:一项综合综述","authors":"Aloysia Ispriantari, Rismia Agustina, Kennedy Diema Konlan, Hyejung Lee","doi":"10.4094/chnr.2023.29.1.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of family-centered interventions on improving health outcomes in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines, using six electronic databases: EMBASE, CINAHL, Medline, CENTRAL, Scopus, and Web of Science. The inclusion criteria encompassed studies with populations of children and adolescents (age <18 years) and at least one parent/caregiver, or only parents/caregivers if the children were very young, and studies that investigated the health outcomes of children and parents/caregivers diagnosed with T1DM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2,746 published studies, only nine studies met the inclusion criteria. The key interventions were non-technology-based interventions (n=4), technology-based interventions (n=2), and combined technology- and non-technologybased interventions (n=3). The interventions had effects on glycated hemoglobin, adherence to diabetes management, diabetes self-management behaviors, and parentchild teamwork in diabetes management. Other essential effects were children's quality of life, children's problem-solving skills, parents' quality of life, and parents' coping and depression.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Family-centered interventions can effectively improve health outcomes in children and adolescents with T1DM. In the future, family-centered interventions integrated with other approaches, theories, and models should be developed to achieve the best possible outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":37360,"journal":{"name":"Child Health Nursing Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/62/76/chnr-29-1-7.PMC9925297.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Family-centered interventions for children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus: an integrative review.\",\"authors\":\"Aloysia Ispriantari, Rismia Agustina, Kennedy Diema Konlan, Hyejung Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.4094/chnr.2023.29.1.7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of family-centered interventions on improving health outcomes in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines, using six electronic databases: EMBASE, CINAHL, Medline, CENTRAL, Scopus, and Web of Science. The inclusion criteria encompassed studies with populations of children and adolescents (age <18 years) and at least one parent/caregiver, or only parents/caregivers if the children were very young, and studies that investigated the health outcomes of children and parents/caregivers diagnosed with T1DM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2,746 published studies, only nine studies met the inclusion criteria. The key interventions were non-technology-based interventions (n=4), technology-based interventions (n=2), and combined technology- and non-technologybased interventions (n=3). The interventions had effects on glycated hemoglobin, adherence to diabetes management, diabetes self-management behaviors, and parentchild teamwork in diabetes management. Other essential effects were children's quality of life, children's problem-solving skills, parents' quality of life, and parents' coping and depression.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Family-centered interventions can effectively improve health outcomes in children and adolescents with T1DM. In the future, family-centered interventions integrated with other approaches, theories, and models should be developed to achieve the best possible outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37360,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Child Health Nursing Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/62/76/chnr-29-1-7.PMC9925297.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Child Health Nursing Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4094/chnr.2023.29.1.7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Health Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4094/chnr.2023.29.1.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
目的:本研究的目的是探讨以家庭为中心的干预措施对改善1型糖尿病(T1DM)儿童和青少年健康结局的影响。方法:采用EMBASE、CINAHL、Medline、CENTRAL、Scopus和Web of Science 6个电子数据库,按照PRISMA指南进行文献检索。纳入标准包括儿童和青少年人群的研究(年龄结果:在2,746项已发表的研究中,只有9项研究符合纳入标准。关键干预措施为非技术为基础的干预措施(n=4)、技术为基础的干预措施(n=2)和技术与非技术相结合的干预措施(n=3)。干预措施对糖化血红蛋白、糖尿病管理依从性、糖尿病自我管理行为和糖尿病管理中的亲子团队合作有影响。其他重要的影响是儿童的生活质量,儿童解决问题的能力,父母的生活质量,以及父母的应对和抑郁。结论:以家庭为中心的干预措施可有效改善儿童和青少年T1DM患者的健康状况。在未来,以家庭为中心的干预措施应与其他方法、理论和模型相结合,以实现最佳可能的结果。
Family-centered interventions for children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus: an integrative review.
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of family-centered interventions on improving health outcomes in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM).
Methods: A literature search was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines, using six electronic databases: EMBASE, CINAHL, Medline, CENTRAL, Scopus, and Web of Science. The inclusion criteria encompassed studies with populations of children and adolescents (age <18 years) and at least one parent/caregiver, or only parents/caregivers if the children were very young, and studies that investigated the health outcomes of children and parents/caregivers diagnosed with T1DM.
Results: From 2,746 published studies, only nine studies met the inclusion criteria. The key interventions were non-technology-based interventions (n=4), technology-based interventions (n=2), and combined technology- and non-technologybased interventions (n=3). The interventions had effects on glycated hemoglobin, adherence to diabetes management, diabetes self-management behaviors, and parentchild teamwork in diabetes management. Other essential effects were children's quality of life, children's problem-solving skills, parents' quality of life, and parents' coping and depression.
Conclusion: Family-centered interventions can effectively improve health outcomes in children and adolescents with T1DM. In the future, family-centered interventions integrated with other approaches, theories, and models should be developed to achieve the best possible outcomes.