基于深度学习的结肠癌肿瘤-基质比率评分与显微评估相关

Marloes A. Smit , Francesco Ciompi , John-Melle Bokhorst , Gabi W. van Pelt , Oscar G.F. Geessink , Hein Putter , Rob A.E.M. Tollenaar , J. Han J.M. van Krieken , Wilma E. Mesker , Jeroen A.W.M. van der Laak
{"title":"基于深度学习的结肠癌肿瘤-基质比率评分与显微评估相关","authors":"Marloes A. Smit ,&nbsp;Francesco Ciompi ,&nbsp;John-Melle Bokhorst ,&nbsp;Gabi W. van Pelt ,&nbsp;Oscar G.F. Geessink ,&nbsp;Hein Putter ,&nbsp;Rob A.E.M. Tollenaar ,&nbsp;J. Han J.M. van Krieken ,&nbsp;Wilma E. Mesker ,&nbsp;Jeroen A.W.M. van der Laak","doi":"10.1016/j.jpi.2023.100191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The amount of stroma within the primary tumor is a prognostic parameter for colon cancer patients. This phenomenon can be assessed using the tumor–stroma ratio (TSR), which classifies tumors in stroma-low (≤50% stroma) and stroma-high (&gt;50% stroma). Although the reproducibility for TSR determination is good, improvement might be expected from automation. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the scoring of the TSR in a semi- and fully automated method using deep learning algorithms is feasible.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A series of 75 colon cancer slides were selected from a trial series of the UNITED study. For the standard determination of the TSR, 3 observers scored the histological slides. Next, the slides were digitized, color normalized, and the stroma percentages were scored using semi- and fully automated deep learning algorithms. Correlations were determined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Spearman rank correlations.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>37 (49%) cases were classified as stroma-low and 38 (51%) as stroma-high by visual estimation. A high level of concordance between the 3 observers was reached, with ICCs of 0.91, 0.89, and 0.94 (all P &lt; .001). Between visual and semi-automated assessment the ICC was 0.78 (95% CI 0.23–0.91, P-value 0.005), with a Spearman correlation of 0.88 (P &lt; .001). Spearman correlation coefficients above 0.70 (N=3) were observed for visual estimation versus the fully automated scoring procedures.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Good correlations were observed between standard visual TSR determination and semi- and fully automated TSR scores. At this point, visual examination has the highest observer agreement, but semi-automated scoring could be helpful to support pathologists.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37769,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pathology Informatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9922811/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep learning based tumor–stroma ratio scoring in colon cancer correlates with microscopic assessment\",\"authors\":\"Marloes A. Smit ,&nbsp;Francesco Ciompi ,&nbsp;John-Melle Bokhorst ,&nbsp;Gabi W. van Pelt ,&nbsp;Oscar G.F. Geessink ,&nbsp;Hein Putter ,&nbsp;Rob A.E.M. Tollenaar ,&nbsp;J. Han J.M. van Krieken ,&nbsp;Wilma E. Mesker ,&nbsp;Jeroen A.W.M. van der Laak\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpi.2023.100191\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The amount of stroma within the primary tumor is a prognostic parameter for colon cancer patients. This phenomenon can be assessed using the tumor–stroma ratio (TSR), which classifies tumors in stroma-low (≤50% stroma) and stroma-high (&gt;50% stroma). Although the reproducibility for TSR determination is good, improvement might be expected from automation. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the scoring of the TSR in a semi- and fully automated method using deep learning algorithms is feasible.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A series of 75 colon cancer slides were selected from a trial series of the UNITED study. For the standard determination of the TSR, 3 observers scored the histological slides. Next, the slides were digitized, color normalized, and the stroma percentages were scored using semi- and fully automated deep learning algorithms. Correlations were determined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Spearman rank correlations.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>37 (49%) cases were classified as stroma-low and 38 (51%) as stroma-high by visual estimation. A high level of concordance between the 3 observers was reached, with ICCs of 0.91, 0.89, and 0.94 (all P &lt; .001). Between visual and semi-automated assessment the ICC was 0.78 (95% CI 0.23–0.91, P-value 0.005), with a Spearman correlation of 0.88 (P &lt; .001). Spearman correlation coefficients above 0.70 (N=3) were observed for visual estimation versus the fully automated scoring procedures.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Good correlations were observed between standard visual TSR determination and semi- and fully automated TSR scores. At this point, visual examination has the highest observer agreement, but semi-automated scoring could be helpful to support pathologists.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37769,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pathology Informatics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9922811/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pathology Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2153353923000056\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pathology Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2153353923000056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

原发肿瘤内基质的数量是结肠癌患者预后的一个参数。这种现象可以通过肿瘤-基质比率(TSR)来评估,TSR将肿瘤分为基质低(≤50%基质)和基质高(>50%基质)。虽然TSR测定的重现性很好,但自动化可能会有所改善。本研究的目的是研究使用深度学习算法在半自动和全自动方法中对TSR评分是否可行。方法从UNITED研究的一系列试验中选择了一系列75张结肠癌载玻片。为标准测定TSR, 3名观察员对组织学切片评分。接下来,对幻灯片进行数字化,颜色归一化,并使用半自动和全自动深度学习算法对基质百分比进行评分。使用类内相关系数(ICCs)和Spearman秩相关来确定相关性。结果经目测,低基质37例(49%),高基质38例(51%)。3位观察者之间达到了高度的一致性,ICCs分别为0.91、0.89和0.94(均P <措施)。在目视评估和半自动化评估之间,ICC为0.78 (95% CI 0.23-0.91, P值0.005),Spearman相关性为0.88 (P <措施)。与全自动评分程序相比,视觉估计的Spearman相关系数大于0.70 (N=3)。结论标准目测TSR与半自动和全自动TSR评分有良好的相关性。在这一点上,视觉检查具有最高的观察者协议,但半自动评分可能有助于支持病理学家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Deep learning based tumor–stroma ratio scoring in colon cancer correlates with microscopic assessment

Background

The amount of stroma within the primary tumor is a prognostic parameter for colon cancer patients. This phenomenon can be assessed using the tumor–stroma ratio (TSR), which classifies tumors in stroma-low (≤50% stroma) and stroma-high (>50% stroma). Although the reproducibility for TSR determination is good, improvement might be expected from automation. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the scoring of the TSR in a semi- and fully automated method using deep learning algorithms is feasible.

Methods

A series of 75 colon cancer slides were selected from a trial series of the UNITED study. For the standard determination of the TSR, 3 observers scored the histological slides. Next, the slides were digitized, color normalized, and the stroma percentages were scored using semi- and fully automated deep learning algorithms. Correlations were determined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Spearman rank correlations.

Results

37 (49%) cases were classified as stroma-low and 38 (51%) as stroma-high by visual estimation. A high level of concordance between the 3 observers was reached, with ICCs of 0.91, 0.89, and 0.94 (all P < .001). Between visual and semi-automated assessment the ICC was 0.78 (95% CI 0.23–0.91, P-value 0.005), with a Spearman correlation of 0.88 (P < .001). Spearman correlation coefficients above 0.70 (N=3) were observed for visual estimation versus the fully automated scoring procedures.

Conclusion

Good correlations were observed between standard visual TSR determination and semi- and fully automated TSR scores. At this point, visual examination has the highest observer agreement, but semi-automated scoring could be helpful to support pathologists.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pathology Informatics
Journal of Pathology Informatics Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pathology Informatics (JPI) is an open access peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the advancement of pathology informatics. This is the official journal of the Association for Pathology Informatics (API). The journal aims to publish broadly about pathology informatics and freely disseminate all articles worldwide. This journal is of interest to pathologists, informaticians, academics, researchers, health IT specialists, information officers, IT staff, vendors, and anyone with an interest in informatics. We encourage submissions from anyone with an interest in the field of pathology informatics. We publish all types of papers related to pathology informatics including original research articles, technical notes, reviews, viewpoints, commentaries, editorials, symposia, meeting abstracts, book reviews, and correspondence to the editors. All submissions are subject to rigorous peer review by the well-regarded editorial board and by expert referees in appropriate specialties.
期刊最新文献
Digital mapping of resected cancer specimens: The visual pathology report A precise machine learning model: Detecting cervical cancer using feature selection and explainable AI ViCE: An automated and quantitative program to assess intestinal tissue morphology Deep feature batch correction using ComBat for machine learning applications in computational pathology LVI-PathNet: Segmentation-classification pipeline for detection of lymphovascular invasion in whole slide images of lung adenocarcinoma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1