利用胸部x射线图像预测致命性肺炎的深度学习模型。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Canadian respiratory journal Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2022/8026580
Satoshi Anai, Junko Hisasue, Yoichi Takaki, Naohiko Hara
{"title":"利用胸部x射线图像预测致命性肺炎的深度学习模型。","authors":"Satoshi Anai,&nbsp;Junko Hisasue,&nbsp;Yoichi Takaki,&nbsp;Naohiko Hara","doi":"10.1155/2022/8026580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Chest X-ray (CXR) is indispensable to the assessment of severity, diagnosis, and management of pneumonia. Deep learning is an artificial intelligence (AI) technology that has been applied to the interpretation of medical images. This study investigated the feasibility of classifying fatal pneumonia based on CXR images using deep learning models on publicly available platforms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>CXR images of patients with pneumonia at diagnosis were labeled as fatal or nonfatal based on medical records. We applied CXR images from 1031 patients with nonfatal pneumonia and 243 patients with fatal pneumonia for training and self-evaluation of the deep learning models. All labeled CXR images were randomly allocated to the training, validation, and test datasets of deep learning models. Data augmentation techniques were not used in this study. We created two deep learning models using two publicly available platforms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The first model showed an area under the precision-recall curve of 0.929 with a sensitivity of 50.0% and a specificity of 92.4% for classifying fatal pneumonia. We evaluated the performance of our deep learning models using sensitivity, specificity, PPV, negative predictive value (NPV), accuracy, and F1 score. Using the external validation test dataset of 100 CXR images, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and F1 score were 68.0%, 86.0%, 77.0%, and 74.7%, respectively. In the original dataset, the performance of the second model showed a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 39.6%, 92.8%, and 82.7%, respectively, while external validation showed values of 38.0%, 92.0%, and 65.0%, respectively. The F1 score was 52.1%. These results were comparable to those obtained by respiratory physicians and residents.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The deep learning models yielded good accuracy in classifying fatal pneumonia. By further improving the performance, AI could assist physicians in the severity assessment of patients with pneumonia.</p>","PeriodicalId":9416,"journal":{"name":"Canadian respiratory journal","volume":"2022 ","pages":"8026580"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9715345/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep Learning Models to Predict Fatal Pneumonia Using Chest X-Ray Images.\",\"authors\":\"Satoshi Anai,&nbsp;Junko Hisasue,&nbsp;Yoichi Takaki,&nbsp;Naohiko Hara\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2022/8026580\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Chest X-ray (CXR) is indispensable to the assessment of severity, diagnosis, and management of pneumonia. Deep learning is an artificial intelligence (AI) technology that has been applied to the interpretation of medical images. This study investigated the feasibility of classifying fatal pneumonia based on CXR images using deep learning models on publicly available platforms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>CXR images of patients with pneumonia at diagnosis were labeled as fatal or nonfatal based on medical records. We applied CXR images from 1031 patients with nonfatal pneumonia and 243 patients with fatal pneumonia for training and self-evaluation of the deep learning models. All labeled CXR images were randomly allocated to the training, validation, and test datasets of deep learning models. Data augmentation techniques were not used in this study. We created two deep learning models using two publicly available platforms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The first model showed an area under the precision-recall curve of 0.929 with a sensitivity of 50.0% and a specificity of 92.4% for classifying fatal pneumonia. We evaluated the performance of our deep learning models using sensitivity, specificity, PPV, negative predictive value (NPV), accuracy, and F1 score. Using the external validation test dataset of 100 CXR images, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and F1 score were 68.0%, 86.0%, 77.0%, and 74.7%, respectively. In the original dataset, the performance of the second model showed a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 39.6%, 92.8%, and 82.7%, respectively, while external validation showed values of 38.0%, 92.0%, and 65.0%, respectively. The F1 score was 52.1%. These results were comparable to those obtained by respiratory physicians and residents.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The deep learning models yielded good accuracy in classifying fatal pneumonia. By further improving the performance, AI could assist physicians in the severity assessment of patients with pneumonia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian respiratory journal\",\"volume\":\"2022 \",\"pages\":\"8026580\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9715345/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian respiratory journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8026580\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian respiratory journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8026580","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:胸部x线检查(CXR)是评估肺炎严重程度、诊断和治疗不可或缺的手段。深度学习是一种人工智能(AI)技术,已应用于医学图像的解释。本研究探讨了在公开平台上使用深度学习模型基于CXR图像对致命性肺炎进行分类的可行性。方法:对诊断时肺炎患者的CXR图像根据病历标记为致死性或非致死性。我们应用1031例非致命性肺炎患者和243例致命性肺炎患者的CXR图像对深度学习模型进行训练和自我评估。所有标记的CXR图像被随机分配到深度学习模型的训练、验证和测试数据集。本研究未使用数据增强技术。我们使用两个公开的平台创建了两个深度学习模型。结果:第一种模型对致死性肺炎分类的精确召回曲线下面积为0.929,灵敏度为50.0%,特异性为92.4%。我们使用敏感性、特异性、PPV、负预测值(NPV)、准确性和F1分数来评估我们的深度学习模型的性能。使用100张CXR图像的外部验证测试数据集,灵敏度、特异性、准确性和F1评分分别为68.0%、86.0%、77.0%和74.7%。在原始数据集中,第二种模型的灵敏度、特异性和准确性分别为39.6%、92.8%和82.7%,而外部验证的值分别为38.0%、92.0%和65.0%。F1评分为52.1%。这些结果与呼吸内科医生和住院医师获得的结果相当。结论:深度学习模型对致死性肺炎的分类具有较好的准确性。通过进一步提高性能,AI可以帮助医生评估肺炎患者的严重程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Deep Learning Models to Predict Fatal Pneumonia Using Chest X-Ray Images.

Background and aims: Chest X-ray (CXR) is indispensable to the assessment of severity, diagnosis, and management of pneumonia. Deep learning is an artificial intelligence (AI) technology that has been applied to the interpretation of medical images. This study investigated the feasibility of classifying fatal pneumonia based on CXR images using deep learning models on publicly available platforms.

Methods: CXR images of patients with pneumonia at diagnosis were labeled as fatal or nonfatal based on medical records. We applied CXR images from 1031 patients with nonfatal pneumonia and 243 patients with fatal pneumonia for training and self-evaluation of the deep learning models. All labeled CXR images were randomly allocated to the training, validation, and test datasets of deep learning models. Data augmentation techniques were not used in this study. We created two deep learning models using two publicly available platforms.

Results: The first model showed an area under the precision-recall curve of 0.929 with a sensitivity of 50.0% and a specificity of 92.4% for classifying fatal pneumonia. We evaluated the performance of our deep learning models using sensitivity, specificity, PPV, negative predictive value (NPV), accuracy, and F1 score. Using the external validation test dataset of 100 CXR images, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and F1 score were 68.0%, 86.0%, 77.0%, and 74.7%, respectively. In the original dataset, the performance of the second model showed a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 39.6%, 92.8%, and 82.7%, respectively, while external validation showed values of 38.0%, 92.0%, and 65.0%, respectively. The F1 score was 52.1%. These results were comparable to those obtained by respiratory physicians and residents.

Conclusions: The deep learning models yielded good accuracy in classifying fatal pneumonia. By further improving the performance, AI could assist physicians in the severity assessment of patients with pneumonia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian respiratory journal
Canadian respiratory journal 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Canadian Respiratory Journal is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that aims to provide a multidisciplinary forum for research in all areas of respiratory medicine. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to asthma, allergy, COPD, non-invasive ventilation, therapeutic intervention, lung cancer, airway and lung infections, as well as any other respiratory diseases.
期刊最新文献
Associations of Vitamin D With GPX4 and Iron Parameters in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients: A Case-Control Study. Geographic Differences in Availability and Access to Care Services for Asthma and COPD: Case Study of Vancouver Coastal Health, British Columbia. Clinical Analysis of 32 Cases of Subglottic Benign Airway Stenosis Treated With Montgomery T Silicone Stent. Nomograms for Predicting High Hospitalization Costs and Prolonged Stay among Hospitalized Patients with pAECOPD. Gentiopicroside Ameliorates Sepsis-Induced Acute Lung Injury via Inhibiting Inflammatory Response.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1